Literature DB >> 23766298

A perverted view of "impact".

Marc Kirschner.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2013        PMID： 23766298     DOI： 10.1126/science.1240456

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Science        ISSN： 0036-8075            Impact factor:   47.728


× No keyword cloud information.
  8 in total

1.  Editorial: Do you see what I see? Quality, reliability, and reproducibility in biomedical research.

Authors:  W Lee Kraus
Journal:  Mol Endocrinol       Date:  2014-03

2.  Basic research is often best appreciated in retrospect.

Authors:  Henry I Miller
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 54.908

Review 3.  Categorizing biomedical research: the basics of translation.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Flier; Joseph Loscalzo
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 4.  The Last 50 Years: Mismeasurement and Mismanagement Are Impeding Scientific Research.

Authors:  Peter A Lawrence
Journal:  Curr Top Dev Biol       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 4.897

5.  Examining the Predictive Validity of NIH Peer Review Scores.

Authors:  Mark D Lindner; Richard K Nakamura
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Embracing the principles of the San Francisco Declaration of Research Assessment: Robert Balaban's editorial.

Authors:  Edward N Pugh; Sharona E Gordon
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 4.086

Review 7.  Origin of innate immune responses: revelation of food and medicinal applications.

Authors:  Edwin L Cooper; Kyle Hirabayashi
Journal:  J Tradit Complement Med       Date:  2013-10

8.  Assessing Individual Intellectual Output in Scientific Research: Mexico's National System for Evaluating Scholars Performance in the Humanities and the Behavioral Sciences.

Authors:  Eugenio Frixione; Lourdes Ruiz-Zamarripa; Gerardo Hernández
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-19       Impact factor: 3.240
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.