Literature DB >> 23766071

Accurately identifying low-allelic fraction variants in single samples with next-generation sequencing: applications in tumor subclone resolution.

Lucy F Stead1, Kate M Sutton, Graham R Taylor, Philip Quirke, Pamela Rabbitts.   

Abstract

Current methods for resolving genetically distinct subclones in tumor samples require somatic mutations to be clustered by allelic frequencies, which are determined by applying a variant calling program to next-generation sequencing data. Such programs were developed to accurately distinguish true polymorphisms and somatic mutations from the artifactual nonreference alleles introduced during library preparation and sequencing. However, numerous variant callers exist with no clear indication of the best performer for subclonal analysis, in which the accuracy of the assigned variant frequency is as important as correctly indicating whether the variant is present or not. Furthermore, sequencing depth (the number of times that a genomic position is sequenced) affects the ability to detect low-allelic fraction variants and accurately assign their allele frequencies. We created two synthetic sequencing datasets, and sequenced real KRAS amplicons, with variants spiked in at specific ratios, to assess which caller performs best in terms of both variant detection and assignment of allelic frequencies. We also assessed the sequencing depths required to detect low-allelic fraction variants. We found that VarScan2 performed best overall with sequencing depths of 100×, 250×, 500×, and 1,000× required to accurately identify variants present at 10%, 5%, 2.5%, and 1%, respectively.
© 2013 WILEY PERIODICALS, INC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  allelic frequency; mutation; next-generation sequencing; subclone; variant

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23766071     DOI: 10.1002/humu.22365

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Mutat        ISSN: 1059-7794            Impact factor:   4.878


  25 in total

1.  Low-frequency KRAS mutations are prevalent in lung adenocarcinomas.

Authors:  Meagan B Myers; Karen L McKim; Fanxue Meng; Barbara L Parsons
Journal:  Per Med       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 2.512

2.  Using VarScan 2 for Germline Variant Calling and Somatic Mutation Detection.

Authors:  Daniel C Koboldt; David E Larson; Richard K Wilson
Journal:  Curr Protoc Bioinformatics       Date:  2013-12

3.  Tumour neoantigen heterogeneity thresholds provide a time window for combination immunotherapy.

Authors:  Guim Aguadé-Gorgorió; Ricard Solé
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2020-10-28       Impact factor: 4.118

4.  RVD2: an ultra-sensitive variant detection model for low-depth heterogeneous next-generation sequencing data.

Authors:  Yuting He; Fan Zhang; Patrick Flaherty
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2015-04-29       Impact factor: 6.937

Review 5.  Not All Next Generation Sequencing Diagnostics are Created Equal: Understanding the Nuances of Solid Tumor Assay Design for Somatic Mutation Detection.

Authors:  Phillip N Gray; Charles L M Dunlop; Aaron M Elliott
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2015-07-17       Impact factor: 6.639

6.  Detecting somatic point mutations in cancer genome sequencing data: a comparison of mutation callers.

Authors:  Qingguo Wang; Peilin Jia; Fei Li; Haiquan Chen; Hongbin Ji; Donald Hucks; Kimberly Brown Dahlman; William Pao; Zhongming Zhao
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2013-10-11       Impact factor: 11.117

7.  Genomic analyses reveal FAM84B and the NOTCH pathway are associated with the progression of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Caixia Cheng; Heyang Cui; Ling Zhang; Zhiwu Jia; Bin Song; Fang Wang; Yaoping Li; Jing Liu; Pengzhou Kong; Ruyi Shi; Yanghui Bi; Bin Yang; Juan Wang; Zhenxiang Zhao; Yanyan Zhang; Xiaoling Hu; Jie Yang; Chanting He; Zhiping Zhao; Jinfen Wang; Yanfeng Xi; Enwei Xu; Guodong Li; Shiping Guo; Yunqing Chen; Xiaofeng Yang; Xing Chen; Jianfang Liang; Jiansheng Guo; Xiaolong Cheng; Chuangui Wang; Qimin Zhan; Yongping Cui
Journal:  Gigascience       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 6.524

8.  Effect of phosphorylation on EGFR dimer stability probed by single-molecule dynamics and FRET/FLIM.

Authors:  Oana Coban; Laura C Zanetti-Dominguez; Daniel R Matthews; Daniel J Rolfe; Gregory Weitsman; Paul R Barber; Jody Barbeau; Viviane Devauges; Florian Kampmeier; Martyn Winn; Borivoj Vojnovic; Peter J Parker; Keith A Lidke; Diane S Lidke; Simon M Ameer-Beg; Marisa L Martin-Fernandez; Tony Ng
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2015-03-10       Impact factor: 4.033

9.  Evaluation of Nine Somatic Variant Callers for Detection of Somatic Mutations in Exome and Targeted Deep Sequencing Data.

Authors:  Anne Bruun Krøigård; Mads Thomassen; Anne-Vibeke Lænkholm; Torben A Kruse; Martin Jakob Larsen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-22       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  A cancer cell-line titration series for evaluating somatic classification.

Authors:  Robert E Denroche; Laura Mullen; Lee Timms; Timothy Beck; Christina K Yung; Lincoln Stein; John D McPherson; Andrew M K Brown
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2015-12-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.