Literature DB >> 23765734

One man's tall is another man's small: how the framing of portion size influences food choice.

David R Just1, Brian Wansink.   

Abstract

Labels such as 'Large' or 'Super-size' are often used to describe portion sizes. How do these normative labels influence consumer choice and how much they ultimately either consume or waste? Although one might believe that firms use normative labels to impact choice behavior through loss aversion, a field experiment shows consumer's willingness to pay is inconsistent with a loss aversion explanation. Although portions were clearly visible, individuals appeared to use the labels as objective information about their size. Importantly, a second study showed these labels also led people to eat less when food was given a larger sounding name than a smaller name (double vs. regular; regular vs. half-size). If labels are used as size information, policies governing normative names could help reduce food consumption or reduce waste.
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  consumer behavior; food choice; framing; overeating; portion sizes; social norms

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23765734     DOI: 10.1002/hec.2949

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Econ        ISSN: 1057-9230            Impact factor:   3.046


  9 in total

Review 1.  Use and effectiveness of behavioural economics in interventions for lifestyle risk factors of non-communicable diseases: a systematic review with policy implications.

Authors:  Oana M Blaga; Livia Vasilescu; Razvan M Chereches
Journal:  Perspect Public Health       Date:  2017-07-18

Review 2.  Weighing the Evidence of Common Beliefs in Obesity Research.

Authors:  Krista Casazza; Andrew Brown; Arne Astrup; Fredrik Bertz; Charles Baum; Michelle Bohan Brown; John Dawson; Nefertiti Durant; Gareth Dutton; David A Fields; Kevin R Fontaine; Steven Heymsfield; David Levitsky; Tapan Mehta; Nir Menachemi; P K Newby; Russell Pate; Hollie Raynor; Barbara J Rolls; Bisakha Sen; Daniel L Smith; Diana Thomas; Brian Wansink; David B Allison
Journal:  Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 11.176

3.  Using Healthy Defaults in Walt Disney World Restaurants to Improve Nutritional Choices.

Authors:  John Peters; Jimikaye Beck; Jan Lande; Zhaoxing Pan; Michelle Cardel; Keith Ayoob; James O Hill
Journal:  J Assoc Consum Res       Date:  2016-01-01

4.  Restaurant owners' perspectives on a voluntary program to recognize restaurants for offering reduced-size portions, Los Angeles County, 2012.

Authors:  Lauren Gase; Lauren Dunning; Tony Kuo; Paul Simon; Jonathan E Fielding
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2014-03-20       Impact factor: 2.830

Review 5.  Portion Size: Latest Developments and Interventions.

Authors:  Ingrid Steenhuis; Maartje Poelman
Journal:  Curr Obes Rep       Date:  2017-03

Review 6.  Portion, package or tableware size for changing selection and consumption of food, alcohol and tobacco.

Authors:  Gareth J Hollands; Ian Shemilt; Theresa M Marteau; Susan A Jebb; Hannah B Lewis; Yinghui Wei; Julian P T Higgins; David Ogilvie
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-09-14

Review 7.  Improving the design of nutrition labels to promote healthier food choices and reasonable portion sizes.

Authors:  C A Roberto; N Khandpur
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 5.095

Review 8.  Opportunities and barriers for smaller portions in food service: lessons from marketing and behavioral economics.

Authors:  J Riis
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 5.095

9.  The intuitive use of contextual information in decisions made with verbal and numerical quantifiers.

Authors:  Dawn Liu; Marie Juanchich; Miroslav Sirota; Sheina Orbell
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2020-02-10       Impact factor: 2.143

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.