Literature DB >> 23765706

Geographical information systems for mapping maternal ground transport to level III care neonatal centers.

Steffen A Brown1, Michael E Richards2, Erika C Elwell1, William F Rayburn1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this investigation was to determine maternal ground transport times from community hospitals to the nearest hospital offering comprehensive (level III) neonatal care within the contiguous United States. STUDY
DESIGN: This observational study combined data from the 2010 U.S. Census tract and 2010 American Hospital Association Annual Survey. Level III (full complement of care) neonatal centers were plotted using 2010 geographical information systems (GIS) mapping software (ESRI, Redland, California, United States). Locations of level I (uncomplicated care) and level II (limited complicated care) centers and residences of reproductive-aged women (18 to 39 years old) were mapped to identify maternal ground transport times to level III centers.
RESULTS: Most of the 584 level III neonatal centers were located in metropolitan areas (83.5%). The proportions of level I and level II hospitals within a 30-minute drive of a level III neonatal center were 19.8 and 47.3%, and 52.2 and 69.8% were within a 60-minute drive time. Ground transport times were shortest in the Northeast and metropolitan areas, and longest in the rural Great Plains and noncoastal West.
CONCLUSION: GIS mapping enables health providers and health policy makers to better understand maternal ground transport times to current and future regional hospitals offering level III neonatal services. Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23765706     DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1348029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Perinatol        ISSN: 0735-1631            Impact factor:   1.862


  6 in total

1.  Travel time and attrition from VHA care among women veterans: how far is too far?

Authors:  Sarah A Friedman; Susan M Frayne; Eric Berg; Alison B Hamilton; Donna L Washington; Fay Saechao; Natalya C Maisel; Julia Y Lin; Katherine J Hoggatt; Ciaran S Phibbs
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 2.  United States and territory policies supporting maternal and neonatal transfer: review of transport and reimbursement.

Authors:  E M Okoroh; C D Kroelinger; S M Lasswell; D A Goodman; A M Williams; W D Barfield
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2015-09-03       Impact factor: 2.521

3.  A Regionalization Model to Increase Equity of Access to Maternal and Neonatal Care Services in Iran.

Authors:  Zahra Mohammadi Daniali; Mohammad Mehdi Sepehri; Farzad Movahedi Sobhani; Mohammad Heidarzadeh
Journal:  J Prev Med Public Health       Date:  2021-12-28

4.  Comparison of global indicators for severe maternal morbidity among South Korean women who delivered from 2003 to 2018: a population-based retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Jin Young Nam
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2022-08-13       Impact factor: 3.355

5.  Use of a Google Map Tool Embedded in an Internet Survey Instrument: Is it a Valid and Reliable Alternative to Geocoded Address Data?

Authors:  Sharoda Dasgupta; Adam S Vaughan; Michael R Kramer; Travis H Sanchez; Patrick S Sullivan
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2014-04-10

6.  The effect of concentrating obstetrics services in fewer hospitals on patient access: a simulation.

Authors:  Soichi Koike; Masatoshi Matsumoto; Hiroo Ide; Saori Kashima; Hidenao Atarashi; Hideo Yasunaga
Journal:  Int J Health Geogr       Date:  2016-01-22       Impact factor: 3.918

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.