Literature DB >> 23765597

Peripheral blood stem cell mobilization in multiple myeloma patients treat in the novel therapy-era with plerixafor and G-CSF has superior efficacy but significantly higher costs compared to mobilization with low-dose cyclophosphamide and G-CSF.

Lubna Chaudhary1, Farrukh Awan, Aaron Cumpston, Sonia Leadmon, Kathy Watkins, William Tse, Michael Craig, Mehdi Hamadani.   

Abstract

Studies comparing the efficacy and cost of peripheral blood stem and progenitor cells mobilization with low-dose cyclophosphamide (LD-CY) and granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) against plerixafor and G-CSF, in multiple myeloma (MM) patients treated in the novel therapy-era are not available. Herein, we report mobilization outcomes of 107 patients who underwent transplantation within 1-year of starting induction chemotherapy with novel agents. Patients undergoing mobilization with LD-CY (1.5 gm/m(2)) and G-CSF (n = 74) were compared against patients receiving plerixafor and G-CSF (n = 33). Compared to plerixafor, LD-CY was associated with a significantly lower median peak peripheral blood CD34+ cell count (68/µL vs. 36/µL, P = 0.048), and lower CD34+ cell yield on day 1 of collection (6.9 × 10(6)/kg vs. 2.4 × 10(6)/kg, P = 0.001). Six patients (8.1%) in the LD-CY group experienced mobilization failure, compared to none in the plerixafor group. The total CD34+ cell yield was significantly higher in the plerixafor group (median 11.6 × 10(6)/kg vs. 7 × 10(6)/kg; P-value = 0.001). Mobilization with LD-CY was associated with increased (albeit statistically non-significant) episodes of febrile neutropenia (5.4% vs. 0%; P = 0.24), higher use of intravenous antibiotics (6.7% vs. 3%; P = 0.45), and need for hospitalizations (9.4% vs. 3%; P = 0.24). The average total cost of mobilization in the plerixafor group was significantly higher compared to the LD-CY group ($28,980 vs. $19,626.5 P-value < 0.0001). In conclusion, in MM plerixafor-based mobilization has superior efficacy, but significantly higher mobilization costs compared to LD-CY mobilization. Our data caution against the use of LD-CY in MM patients for mobilization, especially after induction with lenalidomide-containing regimens.
Copyright © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bortezomib; cyclophosphamide; lenalidomide; mobilization; multiple myeloma; plerixafor

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23765597     DOI: 10.1002/jca.21280

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Apher        ISSN: 0733-2459            Impact factor:   2.821


  8 in total

Review 1.  Current clinical indications for plerixafor.

Authors:  Stefan Fruehauf
Journal:  Transfus Med Hemother       Date:  2013-07-19       Impact factor: 3.747

2.  Cost and efficacy of peripheral stem cell mobilization strategies in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Zoé Van de Wyngaert; Virginie Nerich; Samuel Limat; Xavier Leleu; Guillemette Fouquet; Marie-Lorraine Chrétien; Denis Caillot; Nabih Azar; Laurent Garderet; Pascal Lenain; Margaret Macro; Jean-Henri Bourhis; Ramdane Belhocine; Arnaud Jaccard; Lionel Karlin; Arthur Bobin; Niels Moya; Thomas Systchenko; Cecile Gruchet; Christine Giraud; Stéphanie Guidez; Claire Darras; Isabelle Princet; Cyrille Touzeau; Philippe Moreau; Cyrille Hulin; Erik Deconinck
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2020-05-23       Impact factor: 5.483

3.  Plerixafor for autologous stem-cell mobilization and transplantation for patients in Ontario.

Authors:  C T Kouroukis; N P Varela; C Bredeson; J Kuruvilla; A Xenocostas
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2016-08-12       Impact factor: 3.677

4.  Bendamustine, bortezomib and prednisone for the treatment of patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: results of a prospective phase 2 Spanish/PETHEMA trial.

Authors:  María-Victoria Mateos; Albert Oriol; Laura Rosiñol; Felipe de Arriba; Noemí Puig; Jesús Martín; Joaquín Martínez-López; María Asunción Echeveste; Josep Sarrá; Enrique Ocio; Gemma Ramírez; Rafael Martínez; Luis Palomera; Angel Payer; Rebeca Iglesias; Javier de la Rubia; Adrian Alegre; Ana Isabel Chinea; Joan Bladé; Juan José Lahuerta; Jesús-F San Miguel
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2015-04-24       Impact factor: 9.941

Review 5.  How we manage autologous stem cell transplantation for patients with multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Morie A Gertz; David Dingli
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2014-06-27       Impact factor: 22.113

6.  Stem Cell Mobilization in Multiple Myeloma: Comparing Safety and Efficacy of Cyclophosphamide +/- Plerixafor versus Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor +/- Plerixafor in the Lenalidomide Era.

Authors:  Andrew Johnsrud; Abdullah Ladha; Lori Muffly; Parveen Shiraz; Gary Goldstein; Victoria Osgood; Judith A Shizuru; Laura Johnston; Sally Arai; Wen-Kai Weng; Robert Lowsky; Andrew R Rezvani; Everett H Meyer; Matthew J Frank; Robert S Negrin; David B Miklos; Surbhi Sidana
Journal:  Transplant Cell Ther       Date:  2021-04-26

7.  Plerixafor is superior to conventional chemotherapy for first-line stem cell mobilisation, and is effective even in heavily pretreated patients.

Authors:  R E Clark; J Bell; J O Clark; B Braithwaite; U Vithanarachchi; N McGinnity; T Callaghan; S Francis; R Salim
Journal:  Blood Cancer J       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 11.037

8.  Chemotherapy-based versus chemotherapy-free stem cell mobilization (± plerixafor) in multiple myeloma patients: an Italian cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Luca Castagna; Francesco Lanza; Daniele Laszlo; Giuseppe Milone; Luca Pierelli; Riccardo Saccardi; Carlo Lazzaro
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2021-03-22       Impact factor: 5.174

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.