Literature DB >> 23765548

Gross examination by the surgeon as an alternative to frozen section for assessment of adequacy of surgical margin in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Pankaj Chaturvedi1, Sourav Datta, Sudhir Nair, Deepa Nair, Prashant Pawar, Sagar Vaishampayan, Asawari Patil, Shubhada Kane.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The cost-effectiveness of the frozen section for assessment of margin in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is still contentious. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether gross examination of margin is an alternative to frozen section.
METHODS: It was a prospective observational study in 145 consecutive patients undergoing surgery for HNSCC. Surgical margins were first assessed by the surgeons with a metallic scale. All specimens were then examined using frozen section and permanent section.
RESULTS: Overall, 83% of inadequate margins were detected by frozen section. The chances of inadequate margin were very low if gross surgical margin were 7 mm or more. Gross examination alone (with 7 mm as cutoff) predicted 88% of the inadequate surgical margin. There was no difference in precision of frozen section vis-à-vis gross examination with 7 mm cut off (p ≤ .8).
CONCLUSION: Achievement of 7 mm surgical margin measured by a surgeon obviates the need for frozen section.
Copyright © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  frozen section; gross assessment; head and neck squamous cell carcinoma; surgical margin

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23765548     DOI: 10.1002/hed.23313

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Head Neck        ISSN: 1043-3074            Impact factor:   3.147


  6 in total

Review 1.  Intraoperative Margin Assessment in Head and Neck Cancer: A Case of Misuse and Abuse?

Authors:  Mark W Kubik; Shaum Sridharan; Mark A Varvares; Dan P Zandberg; Heath D Skinner; Raja R Seethala; Simion I Chiosea
Journal:  Head Neck Pathol       Date:  2020-03-02

Review 2.  Performance of Intraoperative Assessment of Resection Margins in Oral Cancer Surgery: A Review of Literature.

Authors:  Elisa M Barroso; Yassine Aaboubout; Lisette C van der Sar; Hetty Mast; Aniel Sewnaik; Jose A Hardillo; Ivo Ten Hove; Maria R Nunes Soares; Lars Ottevanger; Tom C Bakker Schut; Gerwin J Puppels; Senada Koljenović
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-03-30       Impact factor: 6.244

3.  Does diagnostic accuracy of surgeon's perception outweigh frozen section analysis in determining intraoperative clear mucosal surgical margins in oral squamous cell carcinoma patients?

Authors:  Chetan Gupta; Nitin Bhola; Anendd Jadhav; Apoorva Mishra; Pawan Hingnikar; Chinmay Ghavat
Journal:  Natl J Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2020-12-16

4.  Acetic Acid and Iodine Staining for Determining Malignancy in Solid Tumors.

Authors:  Maulina Indah Anugrah Putri; Sonar Soni Panigoro; Agnes Stephanie Harahap; Trevino Aristarkus Pakasi; Bayu Brahma
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2021-02-01

Review 5.  The Indian scenario of head and neck oncology - Challenging the dogmas.

Authors:  Vidisha Tuljapurkar; Harsh Dhar; Aseem Mishra; Swagnik Chakraborti; Pankaj Chaturvedi; Prathamesh S Pai
Journal:  South Asian J Cancer       Date:  2016 Jul-Sep

6.  Frozen Section Analysis and Real-Time Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Surgical Specimen Oriented on 3D Printed Tongue Model to Assess Surgical Margins in Oral Tongue Carcinoma: Preliminary Results.

Authors:  Caterina Giannitto; Giuseppe Mercante; Luca Disconzi; Riccardo Boroni; Elena Casiraghi; Federica Canzano; Michele Cerasuolo; Francesca Gaino; Armando De Virgilio; Barbara Fiamengo; Fabio Ferreli; Andrea Alessandro Esposito; Paolo Oliva; Flavio Ronzoni; Luigi Terracciano; Giuseppe Spriano; Luca Balzarini
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-12-09       Impact factor: 6.244

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.