Literature DB >> 23764960

Outcomes analysis in epistaxis management: development of a therapeutic algorithm.

Josef Shargorodsky1, Benjamin S Bleier, Eric H Holbrook, Jeffrey M Cohen, Nicolas Busaba, Ralph Metson, Stacey T Gray.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study explored the outcomes of epistaxis treatment modalities to optimize management and enable the development of a therapeutic algorithm. STUDY
DESIGN: Case series with chart review.
SETTING: Tertiary care hospital. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Adult patients presenting between 2005 and 2011 with epistaxis underwent cauterization, tamponade, and/or proximal vascular control. Outcomes of treatment modalities were compared. Multivariate logistic regression was used to calculate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), adjusting for coagulopathy, hypertension, and bleeding site.
RESULTS: The population included 147 patients (94 men, 53 women). For initial epistaxis, nondissolvable packing demonstrated the highest initial treatment failure rate of 57.4% (OR, 3.37; 95% CI, 1.33-8.59 compared with cautery). No significant differences were noted among initial posterior epistaxis treatment modalities. Length of nondissolvable pack placement for 3, 4, or 5 days had no significant impact on recurrence. Among patients who failed initial management, those who next underwent cautery or proximal vascular control required a significantly shorter inpatient stay of 5.3 vs 6.8 days compared with those who underwent packing (OR, 0.16; 95% CI, 0.04-0.68). There were no treatment failures following surgical arterial ligation.
CONCLUSION: Initial management of anterior epistaxis with chemical cautery had a higher success rate and a lower number of total required interventions than did nondissolvable packing. Duration of packing did not affect recurrence. In patients who failed initially, progression to cautery or proximal vascular control led to significantly shorter inpatient stays than did packing.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bleeding; epistaxis; nasal packing

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23764960     DOI: 10.1177/0194599813492949

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 0194-5998            Impact factor:   3.497


  6 in total

Review 1.  Sinuses and Common Rhinologic Conditions.

Authors:  Nyall R London; Murugappan Ramanathan
Journal:  Med Clin North Am       Date:  2018-08-18       Impact factor: 5.456

Review 2.  Changing Trends in the Management of Epistaxis.

Authors:  Henri Traboulsi; Elie Alam; Usamah Hadi
Journal:  Int J Otolaryngol       Date:  2015-08-16

3.  Hospitalization for epistaxis: a population-based healthcare research study in Thuringia, Germany.

Authors:  Max Kallenbach; Andreas Dittberner; Daniel Boeger; Jens Buentzel; Holger Kaftan; Kerstin Hoffmann; Peter Jecker; Andreas Mueller; Gerald Radtke; Orlando Guntinas-Lichius
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2020-03-02       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Von-Willebrand disease presenting as intractable epistaxis after nasal polypectomy.

Authors:  Jeong Jin Park; Chang-Hoon Kim; Jeung-Gweon Lee; Hyung-Ju Cho
Journal:  Case Rep Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-08-25

5.  In vitro comparison of surgical techniques in times of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: electrocautery generates more droplets and aerosol than laser surgery or drilling.

Authors:  Daniela B Guderian; Andreas G Loth; Roxanne Weiß; Marc Diensthuber; Timo Stöver; Martin Leinung
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2020-09-07       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Examining seasonal variation in epistaxis in a maritime climate.

Authors:  Ben McMullin; Paul Atkinson; Natasha Larivée; Christopher J Chin
Journal:  J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2019-12-30
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.