Literature DB >> 23764798

Is there a role for acetabular dysplasia correction in an asymptomatic patient?

Dennis R Wenger1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Childhood hip dysplasia is best treated in infancy or early childhood with hopes that the acetabulum will be completely normalized by nonoperative treatment methods, which may include Pavlik and brace treatment as well as formal closed reduction and hip spica casting. In many cases, this ideal result cannot be achieved and the child is left with residual dysplasia, which is often not symptomatic. Other patients may present late with hip dysplasia that is not identified in early childhood. Some develop hip pain with no prior known hip problem. Other children have asymptomatic dysplasia that is picked up on an incidental radiograph. The orthopaedic literature is clear regarding the need for corrective hip osteotomies in symptomatic children. Surgery to correct asymptomatic hip dysplasia remains controversial.
METHODS: Children who have no symptoms yet have abnormal radiographs present a puzzling circumstance. In these cases, surgeons need to use quoted radiographic normal values for acetabular coverage of the femoral head as well as long-term natural history studies to decide whether to proceed with a corrective acetabular osteotomy. Long-term follow-up studies confirm that even patients with borderline dysplasia are likely to have significant hip symptoms and arthritis by middle age.
RESULTS: Many children and adolescents with asymptomatic residual hip dysplasia should have corrective acetabular procedures performed. Surgery is more easily performed with more predictable results when the child is younger than 8 years.
CONCLUSIONS: It is impossible to state with certainty which children with residual radiographic hip dysplasia, but without symptoms, should have a corrective acetabular osteotomy. Review of the literature confirms that many patients have been undertreated in the past, with a high percentage of children with borderline hip dysplasia developing premature arthritis in early to mid-adult life. Current data suggest that surgery should be performed in borderline cases. Skill of the surgeon in performing acetabular osteotomies and/or ease of referral to a treatment center may temper the timing of such decisions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23764798     DOI: 10.1097/BPO.0b013e3182771764

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop        ISSN: 0271-6798            Impact factor:   2.324


  6 in total

1.  [Congenital hip dysplasia, screening and therapy].

Authors:  A Kolb; R Windhager; C Chiari
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 2.  Surgical treatment for young adult hip dysplasia: joint-preserving options.

Authors:  Min Chen; Xi-Fu Shang
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-07-28       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Endoscopic Shelf Acetabuloplasty for Treating Acetabular Large Bone Cyst in Patient With Dysplasia.

Authors:  Kazuki Yamada; Dean K Matsuda; Hitoshi Suzuki; Akinori Sakai; Soshi Uchida
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2018-06-04

4.  Residual hip dysplasia in children: osseous and cartilaginous acetabular angles to guide further treatment-a pilot study.

Authors:  Sophie Rosa Merckaert; Katarzyna Pierzchala; Aline Bregou; Pierre-Yves Zambelli
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 2.359

5.  Prediction of time to prosthesis implantation as a function of joint anatomy in patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip.

Authors:  Michael Müller; Anasthasia Rakow; Georgi I Wassilew; Tobias Winkler; Carsten Perka
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2019-12-30       Impact factor: 2.359

6.  Should paediatricians initiate orthopaedic hip dysplasia referrals for infants with isolated asymmetric skin folds?

Authors:  C R Louer; J D Bomar; M E Pring; S J Mubarak; V V Upasani; D R Wenger
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2019-12-01       Impact factor: 1.548

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.