Mairiosa Biddle1, Sana Hamid1, Nadeem Ali2. 1. Moorfields Eye Clinic, St George's Hospital, 162 City Road, London EC1V 2PD, UK. 2. Moorfields Eye Clinic, St George's Hospital, 162 City Road, London EC1V 2PD, UK. Electronic address: Nadeem.Ali@moorfields.nhs.uk.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Judging depth is important in surgery. Although there are several cues that permit depth perception, stereoacuity has been singled out as a possible predictor of surgical ability. However, it is not clear whether high-grade stereoacuity is necessary for a career in surgery. To help answer this, we aimed to evaluate stereoacuities in practising surgeons across a range of surgical specialities. METHODS: We recorded stereoacuity values on 66 surgeons working at a London teaching hospital using three standard stereotests: Titmus, TNO and Frisby. There were 36 Trainees and 30 Consultants, covering 12 surgical specialities. RESULTS: Median stereoacuities (with range) for the whole group were: 40 s arc on Titmus (40-800), 30 s arc on TNO (15-480) and 20 s arc on Frisby (20-600). Four surgeons had no recordable stereoacuity on TNO, and one was also unrecordable on Titmus. Three of these four were Consultants. Depending on the test used, high-grade stereopsis was found in 74%-83% of surgeons while reduced stereopsis was found in 2%-14% of surgeons. CONCLUSION: While we found that most surgeons in current NHS practice have high-grade stereoacuity, there are also surgeons with reduced stereopsis and some with no stereopsis. The findings do not therefore support the assertion that high-grade stereopsis is a universal requirement for a career in surgery. It would be difficult to justify setting a stereoacuity criterion for entrance into a surgical training programme.
BACKGROUND: Judging depth is important in surgery. Although there are several cues that permit depth perception, stereoacuity has been singled out as a possible predictor of surgical ability. However, it is not clear whether high-grade stereoacuity is necessary for a career in surgery. To help answer this, we aimed to evaluate stereoacuities in practising surgeons across a range of surgical specialities. METHODS: We recorded stereoacuity values on 66 surgeons working at a London teaching hospital using three standard stereotests: Titmus, TNO and Frisby. There were 36 Trainees and 30 Consultants, covering 12 surgical specialities. RESULTS: Median stereoacuities (with range) for the whole group were: 40 s arc on Titmus (40-800), 30 s arc on TNO (15-480) and 20 s arc on Frisby (20-600). Four surgeons had no recordable stereoacuity on TNO, and one was also unrecordable on Titmus. Three of these four were Consultants. Depending on the test used, high-grade stereopsis was found in 74%-83% of surgeons while reduced stereopsis was found in 2%-14% of surgeons. CONCLUSION: While we found that most surgeons in current NHS practice have high-grade stereoacuity, there are also surgeons with reduced stereopsis and some with no stereopsis. The findings do not therefore support the assertion that high-grade stereopsis is a universal requirement for a career in surgery. It would be difficult to justify setting a stereoacuity criterion for entrance into a surgical training programme.
Authors: Loulwa M Al-Saud; Faisal Mushtaq; Isra'a Mirghani; Ahmed Balkhoyor; Andrew Keeling; Michael Manogue; Mark A Mon-Williams Journal: Ophthalmic Physiol Opt Date: 2017-07 Impact factor: 3.117
Authors: Anna L Roethe; Philipp Landgraf; Torsten Schröder; Martin Misch; Peter Vajkoczy; Thomas Picht Journal: Acta Neurochir (Wien) Date: 2020-05-19 Impact factor: 2.216
Authors: Nicolas Schlinkmann; Rutvik Khakhar; Thomas Picht; Sophie K Piper; Lucius S Fekonja; Peter Vajkoczy; Gueliz Acker Journal: Neurosurg Rev Date: 2021-09-22 Impact factor: 3.042