Literature DB >> 2376438

Drop-out and newcomer bias in a community cardiovascular follow-up study.

P L Jooste1, D Yach, H J Steenkamp, J L Botha, J E Rossouw.   

Abstract

Bias resulting from a loss of baseline subjects at follow-up (drop-out), and newcomer bias resulting from subjects entering the study at the follow-up stage, were investigated in a three-community coronary risk factor follow-up study. The study consisted of a cross-sectional baseline study on 7188 participants aged 15 to 64 years, a four-year intervention period and a follow-up cross-sectional study in the same communities on 6283 participants aged 19 to 68 years. The overall non-response rate of 45% in men and 42% in women varied from 30 to 79% in the various age and sex groups, with the biggest drop-out rate occurring in the youngest age group of 15 to 24 years. At baseline drop-outs were more likely to have lower educational qualifications than those who participated in both the baseline and follow-up studies (stayers) and included significantly more smokers than non-smokers. Coronary risk factors of newcomers were not different from that of the stayers at follow-up except for slightly, but not significantly, higher smoking rates in newcomers. These findings suggest that drop-out and newcomer bias need to be assessed and its effect studied before final evaluation of data in community follow-up studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2376438     DOI: 10.1093/ije/19.2.284

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0300-5771            Impact factor:   7.196


  9 in total

1.  Non-response and related factors in a nation-wide health survey.

Authors:  K Korkeila; S Suominen; J Ahvenainen; A Ojanlatva; P Rautava; H Helenius; M Koskenvuo
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 8.082

2.  The tribulations of trials--intervention in communities.

Authors:  M Susser
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Baseline characteristics are not sufficient indicators of non-response bias follow up studies.

Authors:  J Vestbo; F V Rasmussen
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 3.710

4.  Non-response in a nationwide follow-up postal survey in Finland: a register-based mortality analysis of respondents and non-respondents of the Health and Social Support (HeSSup) Study.

Authors:  Sakari Suominen; Karoliina Koskenvuo; Lauri Sillanmäki; Jussi Vahtera; Katariina Korkeila; Mika Kivimäki; Kari J Mattila; Pekka Virtanen; Markku Sumanen; Päivi Rautava; Markku Koskenvuo
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  The impact of non-response bias due to sampling in public health studies: A comparison of voluntary versus mandatory recruitment in a Dutch national survey on adolescent health.

Authors:  Kei Long Cheung; Peter M Ten Klooster; Cees Smit; Hein de Vries; Marcel E Pieterse
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2017-03-23       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 6.  Reporting Survey Based Studies - a Primer for Authors.

Authors:  Prithvi Sanjeevkumar Gaur; Olena Zimba; Vikas Agarwal; Latika Gupta
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2020-11-23       Impact factor: 2.153

7.  Registered nurses' perceptions of having a calling to nursing: A mixed-method study.

Authors:  Hanna Kallio; Mari Kangasniemi; Marja Hult
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2022-02-21       Impact factor: 3.057

8.  Long-Term Postpartum Cardiac Function and Its Association With Preeclampsia.

Authors:  Victoria A deMartelly; John Dreixler; Avery Tung; Ariel Mueller; Sarah Heimberger; Abid A Fazal; Heba Naseem; Roberto Lang; Eric Kruse; Megan Yamat; Joey P Granger; Bhavisha A Bakrania; Javier Rodriguez-Kovacs; Sarosh Rana; Sajid Shahul
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2021-02-23       Impact factor: 5.501

9.  Longterm follow-up in European respiratory health studies - patterns and implications.

Authors:  Ane Johannessen; Giuseppe Verlato; Bryndis Benediktsdottir; Bertil Forsberg; Karl Franklin; Thorarinn Gislason; Mathias Holm; Christer Janson; Rain Jögi; Eva Lindberg; Ferenc Macsali; Ernst Omenaas; Francisco Gomez Real; Eirunn Waatevik Saure; Vivi Schlünssen; Torben Sigsgaard; Trude Duelien Skorge; Cecilie Svanes; Kjell Torén; Marie Waatevik; Roy Miodini Nilsen; Roberto de Marco
Journal:  BMC Pulm Med       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 3.317

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.