Roman Bonet1, Ioannis Vakonakis, Iain D Campbell. 1. Department of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3QU, United Kingdom. roman.bonet@iqac.csic.es
Abstract
Integrins are a family of heterodimeric (α+β) adhesion receptors that play key roles in many cellular processes. Integrins are unusual in that their functions can be modulated from both outside and inside the cell. Inside-out signaling is mediated by binding adaptor proteins to the flexible cytoplasmic tails of the α- and β-integrin subunits. Talin is one well-known intracellular activator, but various other adaptors bind to integrin tails, including 14-3-3-ζ, a member of the 14-3-3 family of dimeric proteins that have a preference for binding phosphorylated sequence motifs. Phosphorylation of a threonine in the β2 integrin tail has been shown to modulate β2/14-3-3-ζ interactions, and recently, the α4 integrin tail was reported to bind to 14-3-3-ζ and associate with paxillin in a ternary complex that is regulated by serine phosphorylation. Here, we use a range of biophysical techniques to characterize interactions between 14-3-3-ζ and the cytoplasmic tails of α4, β1, β2 and β3 integrins. The X-ray structure of the 14-3-3-ζ/α4 complex indicates a canonical binding mode for the α4 phospho-peptide, but unexpected features are also observed: residues outside the consensus 14-3-3-ζ binding motif are shown to be essential for an efficient interaction; in contrast, a short β2 phospho-peptide is sufficient for high-affinity binding to 14-3-3-ζ. In addition, we report novel 14-3-3-ζ/integrin tail interactions that are independent of phosphorylation. Of the integrin tails studied, the strongest interaction with 14-3-3-ζ is observed for the β1A variant. In summary, new insights about 14-3-3-ζ/integrin tail interactions that have implications for the role of these molecular associations in cells are described.
Integrins are a family of heterodimeric (α+β) adhesion receptors that play key roles in many cellular processes. Integrins are unusual in that their functions can be modulated from both outside and inside the cell. Inside-out signaling is mediated by binding adaptor proteins to the flexible cytoplasmic tails of the α- and β-integrin subunits. Talin is one well-known intracellular activator, but various other adaptors bind to integrin tails, including 14-3-3-ζ, a member of the 14-3-3 family of dimeric proteins that have a preference for binding phosphorylated sequence motifs. Phosphorylation of a threonine in the β2 integrin tail has been shown to modulate β2/14-3-3-ζ interactions, and recently, the α4 integrin tail was reported to bind to 14-3-3-ζ and associate with paxillin in a ternary complex that is regulated by serine phosphorylation. Here, we use a range of biophysical techniques to characterize interactions between 14-3-3-ζ and the cytoplasmic tails of α4, β1, β2 and β3 integrins. The X-ray structure of the 14-3-3-ζ/α4 complex indicates a canonical binding mode for the α4 phospho-peptide, but unexpected features are also observed: residues outside the consensus 14-3-3-ζ binding motif are shown to be essential for an efficient interaction; in contrast, a short β2 phospho-peptide is sufficient for high-affinity binding to 14-3-3-ζ. In addition, we report novel 14-3-3-ζ/integrin tail interactions that are independent of phosphorylation. Of the integrin tails studied, the strongest interaction with 14-3-3-ζ is observed for the β1A variant. In summary, new insights about 14-3-3-ζ/integrin tail interactions that have implications for the role of these molecular associations in cells are described.
Integrins are membrane-spanning heterodimeric receptors, associated
with a wide-range of normal functions, including cell adhesion, migration and
differentiation, as well as disease. They are formed by α- and β-subunits
composed of large extracellular (ecto) domains, a transmembrane domain and a usually
short (13–70 residues) C-terminal cytoplasmic domain. The C-terminal domains are flexible
“tails” that act as hubs for numerous protein–protein interactions that
control various inside-to-outside and outside-to-inside signals. To date, knowledge
of interacting partners and regulatory mechanisms is more advanced for β-integrin
than for α-integrin tails. Characterized β-integrin tail binding proteins include
talin, kindlin, filamin and
14-3-3.The 14-3-3 family consists of highly conserved acidic proteins of
~ 30 kDa molecular size that are expressed in
all eukaryotic cells. In humans, seven distinct 14-3-3 isoforms (β, γ, ε, η, σ, τ and
ζ) have been described, all of which form homodimers or heterodimers. They are
involved in the regulation of many signaling pathways, including cell cycle
progression, programmed cell death and cytoskeletal dynamics. The family is also
associated with a number of human diseases, such as cancer and neurological
disorders. 14-3-3 proteins were initially described
as phosphor-serine/threonine binding modules with two consensus recognition motifs,
classified as binding “mode-1” (RSXpSXP) and “mode-2” (RXF/YXpSXP). Subsequently,
divergent binding modes have been described including affinity to unphosphorylated
motifs. X-ray structures of numerous 14-3-3
isoforms and complexes have revealed considerable detail about the various binding
modes.Recently, the structure of 14-3-3-ζ in complex with a phosphorylated
peptide from the β2 integrin tail was determined. Another study linked 14-3-3-β with
β1 and β3 integrins, but no structural details were provided. An association
between 14-3-3-ζ and α4 was recently reported by Deakin et
al., and evidence was presented for a ternary
complex with 14-3-3-ζ/α4 and paxillin, a focal adhesion protein that serves as a
platform for the binding of numerous proteins. In addition, previous studies
suggested that an association between paxillin and the α4 integrin tail is essential
for regulating cell migration. It was proposed that this interaction
is stabilized by 14-3-3-ζ in a ternary complex that accelerates cell
migration. The binding of 14-3-3-ζ to α4 was also
observed to depend on phosphorylation of α4 serine 1011.Here, we aimed to gain insight into the association of integrin
cytoplasmic tails with 14-3-3 proteins. Our initial focus was characterizing the
interaction between the α4 integrin tail and 14-3-3-ζ. We first solved the crystal
structure of 14-3-3-ζ in complex with a phosphorylated α4-derived peptide and defined
its binding mode. The use of complementary techniques, particularly NMR
(nuclear magnetic
resonance) and ITC (isothermal
titration calorimetry), revealed
that the 14-3-3-ζ/α4 interaction is dependent not only on phosphorylation but also on
residues outside the central 14-3-3-ζ binding motif. We found no evidence for a
ternary 14-3-3-ζ/paxillin/α4 complex or a binary paxillin/α4 complex. We also carried
out a biophysical characterization of β-integrin tail interactions with 14-3-3-ζ. All
β-integrin tails tested bound to 14-3-3-ζ in a phosphorylation-independent manner
through an epitope proximal to the transmembrane domain. In the case of β2 integrin
tail, this region is well separated from the previously characterized
phosphorylation-dependent 14-3-3-ζ binding site. Studies of 14-3-3-ζ variants
provided further clues about the key determinants of the interactions.
Results
14-3-3-ζ binding to the α4 integrin cytoplasmic
tail
We used the α4 phospho-mimetic, S1011D, to explore the
phosphorylation dependence of 14-3-3-ζ binding to the consensus RQYKSIL motif in
the α4 tail. NMR-monitored titrations of 15N-labeled full-length α4 integrin tails, wild type (wt) or
S1011D, with unlabeled 14-3-3-ζ produced changes of α4 resonances. As shown in
Fig. 1a, addition of 14-3-3-ζ causes a significant decrease in α4 amide
resonance intensities, indicative of an interaction. The extent of resonance
intensity decrease is high across the whole α4 sequence but is more pronounced in
the N-terminal region where the 14-3-3-ζ binding motif is located (Fig. 1b). Although the characteristics
of the NMR spectra (severe broadening on addition of 14-3-3-ζ) make it difficult
to extract precise information about binding affinities, they clearly show that a
specific interaction between 14-3-3-ζ and α4 exists even in the absence of
phosphorylation.
Fig. 1
NMR studies of the α4/14-3-3-ζ interaction. (a) 15N–1H HSQC spectra of 15N-labeled 0.1 mM α4 wt (left) and S1011D
(right) in black and after the addition of unlabeled 0.1 mM
14-3-3-ζ (overlaid in green and blue, respectively). In a close-up of the α4 wt
spectrum below, resonances corresponding to the residues observed in the crystal
structure are indicated in circles and the phosphorylatable serine is highlighted in
red. (b) The intensity ratio (I/Io) in
the presence (I) or absence (Io) of
14-3-3-ζ of α4 resonances shown in (a) for the wt (top) and S1011D variant (bottom).
The intensity ratios were calculated using the CCPN Analysis software. The
substituted serine residue is highlighted in red.
The affinities of 14-3-3-ζ/α4 interactions were measured by ITC
for the α4 wt and S1011D samples, as well as for two synthetic peptides containing
phospho-serine residues α4-30pS and α4-11pS (see Table 1 for peptide
nomenclature). Typical data are shown in Fig. 2a–d, and the resulting
affinity values are summarized in Fig. 2e. The α4 wt binding to 14-3-3-ζ is relatively weak;
thus, a Kd could not be determined by ITC.
However, the α4 S1011D construct had a Kd
value of approximately 60 μM, and the affinity of the
phospho-serine containing α4-30pS was also strong
(Kd ~ 24 μM). These results are consistent with a
prominent role for phosphorylation in the regulation of 14-3-3 interactions and
show that the phospho-serine-to-aspartic substitution is a suitable
phospho-mimetic for the 14-3-3-ζ/α4 association. Crucially, we observed that α4
residues outside the consensus 14-3-3 binding motif are also necessary for
efficient association, as illustrated by the 14-3-3-ζ/α4-11pS interaction that
gave a Kd value of over 300 μM (an ~ 15-fold reduction in affinity compared to
α4-30pS).
According to Uniprot entries P13612, P05107, P05556, P05106 and P26010P05106P26010.
pS and pT correspond to phospho-serine and phospho-threonine,
respectively, and are in boldface together with serine/threonine substitutions to
aspartic. Amino acids from the cloning tag in the N-terminus of the sequence are
italicized.
R, recombinant; S, synthetic.
Fig. 2
ITC studies of the α4/14-3-3-ζ interaction. (a) ITC
sensorgram of in-cell 120 μM α4 wt sample injected with 1.2 mM 14-3-3-ζ; the interaction is weak, in the millimolar range, and an
accurate fit could not be obtained. (b) ITC sensorgram of in-cell 150 μM α4 S1011D sample injected with 2.0 mM 14-3-3-ζ;
thermodynamic parameters from the fit are shown in (e). (c) ITC sensorgram of in-cell
80 μM α4-30pS phospho-peptide injected with 0.75 mM 14-3-3-ζ. (d) ITC sensorgram of in-cell 120 μM
α4-11pS phospho-peptide injected with 1.2 mM 14-3-3-ζ. (e) ITC
affinity values and thermodynamic parameters of integrin tail fragments for the
14-3-3-ζ interaction.
Structure determination of the 14-3-3-ζ/phospho-α4
integrin tail complex
The ITC observation that α4-30pS has a relatively high affinity
led to the successful crystallization and structure determination of a complex
with 14-3-3-ζ. Crystals were obtained in space group
C2221, diffraction data were collected
to 2.2 Å resolution and the structure was solved by molecular
replacement (Table 2). Each asymmetric unit
contained a single copy of the 14-3-3-ζ/α4-30pS complex. Visible electron density
for the α4 peptide was only present for 8 out of 30 residues
(KRQYKpSIL) in the α4 peptide (Fig. 3a), suggesting
a high degree of disorder for most of the α4 sequence. This
KRQYKpSIL peptide corresponds to a mode-2 14-3-3 binding
motif, except for the leucine in the pS + 2
position, which is a proline in the optimal motif sequence. The structure has
similar features to those observed in previous 14-3-3-ζ/phospho-peptide
complexes. The 14-3-3-ζ protein is a flat, W-shaped
dimer, and each subunit contains nine antiparallel α-helices. The overall
electrostatic surface of 14-3-3-ζ is negatively charged, but the channel
accommodating the phospho-peptide has a basic pocket for the phosphate group
(Fig. 3b). The α4
integrin peptide binds in this pocket, and the phosphate forms electrostatic
interactions with the conserved K49, R56 and R127 residues with an additional
hydrogen bond involving the Y128 side-chain hydroxyl (Fig. 3c). Other key 14-3-3 residues that participate
in peptide binding are illustrated in Fig. 3d.
Table 2
Crystallographic data collection and refinement
statistics
Data
collection
Beamline
Diamond, I04-1
Wavelength (Å)
0.9163
Space group
C2221
Cell parameters
a,
b, c (Å)
89.03, 111.60, 72.99
α, β, γ (°)
90, 90, 90
Resolution (Å)
44.50–2.20 (2.32–2.20)
Total reflections
110,654 (15,795)
Unique reflections
18,798 (2725)
Rmerge
0.079 (0.394)
Completeness (%)
99.8 (100)
Multiplicity
5.9 (5.8)
I/σ(I)
9.8 (3.2)
Refinement
Rwork/Rfree
(%)
19.7/23.9
RMSD from ideal values
Bonds/angles (Å/°)
0.010/1.02
Overall mean
B values (Å2)
Protein
59.2
Peptide
70.3
Solvent
60.2
No. of amino acid residues per asymmetric
unit
237
No. of water molecules
121
Matthews coefficient
2.79 (solvent content, 55.93%)
MolProbity statistics
All-atom contacts: clashcore,
all atoms
1.58
Protein geometry: poor
rotamers (%)
0.50
Ramachandran plot (%)
Residues in preferred
regions
98.3
Residues in allowed
regions
1.7
Residues in disallowed
regions
0.0
Cβ deviations greater than
0.25 Å
0
MolProbity score
0.90
Residues with bad bonds (%)
0.0
Residues with bad angles (%)
0.0
Values for the highest-resolution shell are shown in
parentheses.
Fig. 3
Details of the 14-3-3-ζ/α4 phospho-peptide interaction and
comparison of the 14-3-3-ζ/α4 and 14-3-3-ζ/β2 binding modes. (a) Electron density
omit map (2Fo − Fc) of the α4 peptide region at
σ = 2. The map was calculated using simulated
annealing refinement in PHENIX after excluding the peptide and nearby
atoms of 14-3-3-ζ. Peptide residues are labeled. (b) Representation of the
electrostatic potential on the solvent-accessible surface of a 14-3-3-ζ monomer
showing the basic pocket where the peptide phosphate group is accommodated. The α4
peptide is shown in green ball-and-stick representation, with the phosphate group in
orange. The electrostatic surface was generated by the APBS software as a plug-in in
PyMOL with chosen values of electrostatic potential of ± 5 kT/e for the representation. (c) Representation of the contacts between
the phosphate group from the α4 peptide and the conserved basic pocket K49-R56-R127.
The two additional hydrogen bonds with Y128 and R1007 from the peptide are also
shown. The main chain of 14-3-3-ζ is displayed in light pink, the residues that bind
the peptide phosphate group are displayed in gray and the α4 peptide chain is
displayed in green. (d) Representation of the main 14-3-3-ζ residues (in gray) other
than those in the basic pocket that make contacts with the peptide. Hydrogen bonds
are represented by broken lines. Peptide residues are also represented, in green. (e)
Alignment of integrin tail sequences showing the regions with reported (α4 and
β2) or putative (other integrin tails) 14-3-3
mode-I and mode-II binding motifs. (f) Superimposition of the α4 (in green) and β2
(in black) integrin peptides from the structure presented here and Protein Data Bank
2V7D, respectively; the
phosphate groups are indicated in orange. Some side chains of 14-3-3 residues
important for the binding are also displayed in gray, except for E180, which has
different orientations in the two complexes and is colored to match the corresponding
integrin peptide.
The 14-3-3-ζ/α4 complex is the second structure of an integrin
tail bound to a 14-3-3 protein, after the previously described
14-3-3-ζ/β2-pT. As illustrated in Fig. 3e, the β2 integrin peptide
conforms to a mode-1 14-3-3 binding motif with a phospho-threonine whereas the α4
integrin peptide is mode-2, featuring a phospho-serine; the arrangement of the two
peptides is otherwise similar. PISA analysis gives an interface area of
559.2 Å2 for the 14-3-3-ζ/α4 complex and
449.6 Å2 for 14-3-3-ζ/β2, and an overlay of
the two complexes shows that the two integrin peptides superimpose well, with most
residues involved in complex formation having identical positions in the two
structures (Fig. 3f).
14-3-3-ζ binding to the α4 integrin cytoplasmic tail
and paxillin
The interactions of α4 and 14-3-3-ζ with paxillin were also
investigated. The association of paxillin with α4 has been detected using
pull-down experiments with glutathione S-transferase fusion
proteins and, very recently, by NMR in a
study that also reports the solution structure of the α4 integrin
tail. Using a construct of the N-terminal region
of paxillin (residues 1–323) that included all LD motifs (Supplementary Fig. 1a),
we detected no specific interaction with the α4 integrin tail by NMR
(Supplementary Fig. 1b) and addition of paxillin caused no further changes in a
spectrum containing an α4/14-3-3-ζ mixture (data not shown). Similarly, no
pairwise interaction was detected by ITC (Supplementary Fig. 1c and d). The
possibility that a paxillin/14-3-3-ζ association depends on phosphorylation was
also assessed. The ELM (eukaryotic
linear motif) server indicated three
putative 14-3-3 binding motifs in the paxillin N-terminus; of these, only one has
been reported to be phosphorylated in vivo (Supplementary
Fig. 1a). A phosphorylated peptide containing this motif (corresponding to
paxillin residues 111–128) was tested for binding to 14-3-3-ζ; however, no
interaction was detected by ITC (Supplementary Fig. 1e). Thus, our biophysical
studies do not support the direct involvement of the paxillin N-terminus in the
association of 14-3-3-ζ and α4. The recent report of paxillin binding to α4
detected by NMR used shorter paxillin fragments than us, covering the LD2–LD4
region. It is possible that, in the whole
N-terminal paxillin, the α4 interaction sites are masked, which would explain the
absence of an interaction in our studies.
Interaction studies of the β2 integrin tail with
14-3-3-ζ
To gain further insight into integrin tail binding to 14-3-3-ζ,
we tested the interaction of the β2 integrin tail (residues 724–769) with 14-3-3-ζ
in an analogous manner to the experiments with α4. NMR 15N heteronuclear single quantum coherence (HSQC) experiments of
unphosphorylated β2 integrin tail in the absence or presence of 14-3-3-ζ were
recorded. Addition of 14-3-3-ζ caused selective broadening of β2 resonances
(Fig. 4a), revealing that the binding region is mainly located in the
membrane proximal part of the integrin sequence and the last four C-terminal
residues (Fig. 4b), with
essentially no overlap with the previously described 14-3-3-ζ binding to β2 that
occurs upon phosphorylation of T758 (Fig. 4c). This implies that the β2 integrin tail has two
distinct 14-3-3-ζ sites within its sequence.
Fig. 4
NMR titrations between β2 wt and 14-3-3-ζ. (a) 15N–1H HSQC spectrum of 15N-labeled 0.1 mM β2 wt in the absence
(black) and presence of an equimolar amount of unlabeled 14-3-3-ζ (light pink). (b)
The intensity of β2 integrin tail resonances observed in (a) plotted as the intensity
ratio (I/Io) in the presence
(I) and absence (Io) of 14-3-3-ζ.
(c) Amino acid sequence of the β2 integrin cytoplasmic domain with the two 14-3-3-ζ
binding sites for the phosphorylation-independent (green) and
phosphorylation-dependent (red) sites denoted. The phosphorylatable T758 is shown in
bigger font size and underlined.
The β2/14-3-3-ζ binding strength was also compared with that of
α4/14-3-3-ζ. Similar to α4 wt, unphosphorylated β2 wt showed only a weak
interaction by ITC (Fig. 5a). To evaluate the
effect of phosphorylation on β2, we carried out ITC experiments on the interaction
between 14-3-3-ζ and phosphorylated long and short β2 integrin peptides.
Kd values of 8 μM and
4 μM were obtained for β2-45pT and β2-11pT, respectively
(Figs. 2e and
5b and c). These results
show that, unlike α4, a short 14-3-3-ζ binding motif in the β2 integrin tail is
sufficient to give a relatively high affinity interaction and that contributions
to the affinity from flanking residues outside the 14-3-3-ζ motif are much less
significant in the β2/14-3-3-ζ than in the α4/14-3-3-ζ interaction. Thus,
although the X-ray structures show a similar arrangement for the two integrin
peptides in the 14-3-3-ζ complexes, there are significant differences in the
binding characteristics of the two integrin tails.
Fig. 5
ITC of β2 phospho-peptide interactions with 14-3-3-ζ and
sequence alignment of β-integrin tails. (a) ITC sensorgram of an in-cell 200 μM unphosphorylated β2 wt sample injected with 2 mM
14-3-3-ζ; the interaction is weak, in the millimolar range, and an accurate fit could
not be obtained. (b) ITC sensorgram of an in-cell 120 μM β2-45pT
phospho-peptide injected with 1.2 mM 14-3-3-ζ; thermodynamic
parameters from the fit are shown in Fig. 2e. (c) ITC sensorgram of an in-cell 120 μM
β2-11pT phospho-peptide injected with 1.2 mM 14-3-3-ζ. (d) Sequence
alignment of β-integrin tails used in this study with residues colored depending on
amino acid type (blue for basic, red for acid, purple for aromatic, black for
aliphatic, green for polar and yellow for Gly and Pro residues). Asterisks, colons
and dots indicate the degree of conservation. Residues identical with β1A in
equivalent positions are indicated with dots.
Interaction studies of 14-3-3-ζ and other β-integrin
tails
Our observation that the membrane proximal region of the β2
integrin tail can interact in a phosphorylation-independent manner with 14-3-3-ζ
raises the possibility that other β-integrin tails could behave similarly since
sequence conservation is high across β-integrin tails in this region
(Fig. 5d). In contrast,
α-integrin tail sequences are much more divergent; for example, there is no serine
or threonine equivalent to the phosphorylation site of α4 in other α-integrin
tails. Thus, studies of other α-integrin tails were not pursued, but instead, we
focused on β-integrin tails.NMR 15N HSQC experiments with labeled
β1A, β3 and β7 and unlabeled 14-3-3-ζ (Supplementary Fig. 2a–c) showed an
intensity reduction for several resonances upon 14-3-3-ζ addition. Mapping the
intensity changes reveals that binding occurs to β1A and β3, primarily in the
N-terminal region, in a similar way to β2 (Supplementary Fig. 3a and b). The
pattern of resonance intensity changes is more widespread in β7 (Supplementary
Fig. 3c). Our results are consistent with a study that detected a
phosphorylation-independent interaction between 14-3-3-β and β1A by yeast
two-hybrid experiments. That study also showed that the β1A
region containing serine/threonine residues was dispensable for the β1A/14-3-3-β
interaction. Our NMR studies indicate that the β1D integrin tail, which has
threonine-to-asparagine substitutions, interacts with 14-3-3-ζ in a very similar
way to β1A (Supplementary Figs. 2d and 3d).We also explored whether the phosphorylation-dependent 14-3-3-ζ
binding site seen for β2 is present in other β-integrin tails. As illustrated in
Fig. 3e, all β-integrin
tails contain potential 14-3-3 binding motifs in their C-terminal regions. Unlike
β2-11pT, no binding of peptide β1A-11pT was detected by ITC (data not shown)
possibly because the mode-2 14-3-3 binding motif in β1A is too divergent from the
canonical motif (apart from not having a proline in position pS/T + 2, the β1A motif also lacks an aromatic residue in
position pS/pT-2, having instead an alanine) (Fig. 3e). It thus appears that the β2 integrin tail
is unusual in having two distinct non-overlapping 14-3-3-ζ binding sites.
β-Integrin tails with no phosphorylation site equivalent to that in β2 (such as
β1A, β1D and β7) possibly only interact via the phosphorylation-independent
binding mode.Fluorescence polarization was used to compare the binding of
different integrin tails to 14-3-3-ζ. Fluorescently labeled β1A, β3 and α4
integrin tails were titrated with increasing amounts of 14-3-3-ζ. As shown in
Fig. 6a, a stronger interaction was observed between 14-3-3-ζ and β1A
than with β3 or α4. These differences in affinity were later confirmed using ITC,
where β1A shows a significantly stronger binding, with
Kd ~ 280 μM, than β2, β3 and α4 (Figs. 2b and 6b–d).
Fig. 6
Fluorescence polarization and ITC of interactions between
integrin tails and 14-3-3-ζ. (a) Fluorescence polarization titrations of
fluorescein-labeled β1A, β3 and α4 with 14-3-3-ζ. No binding was detected for β3 and
α4, but β1A clearly binds. The β1A titration was fitted to a single-site model as
described elsewhere, with a value of
Kd = 95 ± 16 μM. (b–d) ITC
sensorgram of an in-cell 200 μM β1A, β2 (same as in Fig. 5a) or β3 samples injected with
2 mM 14-3-3-ζ. Only β1A gave a binding curve that could be
fitted with Kd = 280 ± 40 μM.
Specificity of 14-3-3-ζ/β1A integrin tail
interaction
To gain further insight into the β1A/14-3-3-ζ association, we
investigated the effects of 14-3-3-ζ substitutions on binding to β1A integrin
tail. It has been reported that the substitution S58A in 14-3-3-β abolishes the
β1A interaction. S58 regulates the dimeric state of
14-3-3, but it is not involved directly in binding
to phospho-peptides. The binding of 14-3-3-ζ variants S58A and S58E to labeled β1A
was studied using NMR. As shown in Supplementary Fig. 4, there is significant
reduction in β1A resonance intensity change with the S58A variant compared to the
wt; the intensities change even less with the S58E variant. A similar result was
obtained with the β2 integrin tail (data not shown). These results confirm that
S58 is an important residue for β-integrin tail interactions, either directly by
participating in the binding or indirectly by abrogating the dimeric 14-3-3 state,
thus explaining how phosphorylation of S58 could regulate these
interactions.Note that there were technical difficulties in making some of
these measurements of weak affinity interactions. Some ITC measurements were
limited by protein solubility. The NMR experiments, often one of the best ways of
analyzing weak interactions, were limited because the exchange regime was often in
the intermediate range, giving broad lines. The combined results of the ITC, NMR
and fluorescence results were, however, all gave consistent relative values and
results.
Discussion
The interaction between the α4 integrin tail and 14-3-3-ζ has been
characterized here using a range of biophysical techniques. The crystal structure of
the phosphorylated α4/14-3-3-ζ complex shows that the α4 residues around the pS bind
to 14-3-3-ζ in a mode similar to other 14-3-3-ζ/phospho-peptide complexes. Specific
interactions for both unphosphorylated and a phospho-mimetic form of the α4 integrin
tail with 14-3-3-ζ were detected by NMR, but ITC affinity measurements revealed that
the 14-3-3-ζ interaction with unphosphorylated α4 integrin tail is much weaker than
that with the phosphorylated forms. Residues outside the phosphorylated binding motif
make important contributions to the interaction since binding of a short
phosphorylated α4 integrin peptide is weak compared to a longer one.The characteristics of the 14-3-3-ζ/α4 interaction reported here fit
well with the hypothesis for 14-3-3/ligand complexes described by Yang et
al. that involves primary and secondary interactions. Primary interactions
involve contacts with residues around the phosphate group of the target protein
associated with mode-1 and mode-2 binding motifs; secondary interactions are
phosphorylation independent but crucial for ligand specificity. Our results suggest
that significant secondary interactions occur in the 14-3-3-ζ/α4 complex. Only the
primary interactions were observed in the X-ray structure with the secondary
interactions presumably too dynamic to observe in the crystal.Comparison of the published 14-3-3-ζ/β2 structure with our
14-3-3-ζ/α4 complex revealed similar peptide binding modes; however, the observation
of phosphorylation-independent interactions for the α4 integrin tail and the
importance of residues outside the 14-3-3 motif led us to further explore the
14-3-3-ζ/β2 interaction. A phosphorylation-independent interaction was found for β2
as well, and it was mapped to a location distinct from the phosphorylation-dependent
14-3-3-ζ binding region of that integrin tail. As in α4, this
phosphorylation-independent interaction is much weaker than that mediated by the β2
phosphorylation site. However, the short phosphorylated binding motif in the β2
integrin tail has much higher affinity for 14-3-3-ζ than the corresponding α4 motif.
While residues outside the 14-3-3 binding motif are important for an efficient
interaction in α4, short and long β2 phospho-peptides associated to 14-3-3-ζ with
virtually the same affinity. These different requirements for flanking residues could
arise from cooperative effects for the α4 interaction, not present in the β2
case.The NMR interaction studies were extended to β1A, β3, β7 and β1D;
these indicated that 14-3-3-ζ binds all of these in a phosphorylation-independent
manner. In β1, β2 and β3 integrin tails, the binding involves a stretch of 15–20
residues in the membrane proximal part. All these interactions were found to be very
weak, but the β1A/14-3-3-ζ association was found to be significantly stronger than
for other β-integrin tails.Numerous regulated protein–protein interactions are essential in a
functioning cell. Many of these interactions are weak and they are sensitive to
secondary effects, for example, modulation of local concentration by sequestration of
partners close to the plasma membrane.Although the 14-3-3 interactions detected here are weak, many
specific biologically relevant interactions of similar magnitude are known, for
example, talin/β-integrin tail interactions. Presumably these affinities are tuned to be
sensitive to modulation of local concentrations in the cell. Studies
of these weak interactions are often contradictory because interactions detected by
some methods, such as yeast two-hybrid and pull-down experiments with fusion
proteins, are no longer detected when purified reagents and biophysical methods are
applied.It has been proposed that 14-3-3-β regulates integrin-mediated cell
adhesion by a FAK-independent mechanism. Other studies reported that the absence of
14-3-3-ζ inhibited integrin-induced Rac1 activation and cell spreading and that these
processes were compromised by a 14-3-3-ζ S58D variant. Our
results with 14-3-3-ζ S58 variants are consistent with these findings and highlight
the role of S58 in mediating 14-3-3-ζ interactions with integrins.In conclusion, the crystal structure of an α-integrin cytoplasmic
tail in complex with 14-3-3-ζ together with detailed biophysical studies have shown
that, while many structural features are similar to other known 14-3-3 complexes, the
binding exhibits subtle features involving secondary sites. We have also shown that
14-3-3-ζ is a general binder of β-integrin tails, with a preference for β1A, and that
β2 contains two independent, non-overlapping 14-3-3-ζ binding sites. Questions beyond
the scope of this work will be key for future studies: what is the physiological role
of 14-3-3/integrin tail interactions; how do properties and affinities of the various
14-3-3/integrin tail complexes relate to different aspects of cell biology; the
determination of the structure of a 14-3-3/unphosphorylated β-integrin tail complex
would also provide valuable information about the molecular details of the novel
β-integrin tail interaction we reported and whether this is likely to be involved in
competition with talin in the process of integrin activation.
Materials and Methods
Protein expression and purification
Integrin cytoplasmic tails were cloned into a modified pET16b
vector with an N-terminal His10 tag followed by a 3C protease
cleavage site and the required integrin tail sequence and expressed in
Escherichia coli BL21 (DE3) with 0.5 mM IPTG overnight at 37 °C. M9 minimal media containing
15NH4Cl and 13C glucose were used to prepare labeled integrin tails. The proteins
were purified under denaturing conditions [50 mM sodium
phosphate, 150 mM NaCl, 8 M urea and 0.035%
β-mercaptoethanol (pH 7.0)] by Co2 + affinity resin (Thermo Scientific) eluting with 200 mM imidazole. Samples were then dialyzed against 50 mM sodium phosphate, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM
ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid and 1 mM DTT, cleaved with 3C
protease at 4 °C and further purified by reverse phase HPLC
using a C18 column (Jupiter).14-3-3-ζ was expressed from the same pET16b vector in an
analogous manner (0.5 mM IPTG, 20 °C
incubation). Cells were harvested by centrifugation; resuspended in 50 mM sodium phosphate, 150 mM NaCl and 0.035%
β-mercaptoethanol (pH 7.0); and disrupted by sonication. The
soluble fraction was purified by Co2 + affinity
chromatography, cleaved to remove the His10 tag and further
purified by size-exclusion chromatography in NMR buffer [20 mM
sodium phosphate and 50 mM NaCl (pH 6.5)],
using a Superdex75 column (GE Healthcare).Integrin tail and 14-3-3-ζ mutants were generated according to
the QuikChange site-directed mutagenesis protocol (Stratagene) and produced and
purified in the same way as wt proteins.
NMR spectroscopy
Samples were prepared in NMR buffer (pH 6.5)
with 5% D2O, and experiments were performed at 25 °C. Titration experiments were collected on a 500-MHz spectrometer
using a water flip-back-embedded gradient enhanced 15N–1H HSQC pulse sequence. For the
assignment of the α4 and β2 backbone resonances, 15N–13C integrin tails of 0.6 mM concentration were used to measure CBCA(CO)NH and CBCANH
experiments on a Bruker 500-MHz instrument equipped with a cryogenic probe head.
Data were processed using NMRPipe and analyzed with the programs
CARA/XEASY or CCPN Analysis.
ITC and fluorescence polarization
Phosphorylated α4 synthetic peptides were purchased from GL
Biochem Ltd. (Shanghai). All recombinant proteins and synthetic peptides were
prepared in 20 mM sodium phosphate and 50 mM
NaCl (pH 6.5), and concentrations were determined by UV
absorbance at 280 nm. ITC experiments using a
VP-ITC200 instrument (MicroCal) were performed at 298 K as follows: the cell (volume, ~ 200 μl) contained the different integrin tail fragments, and the syringe
(volume, ~ 40 μl) contained 14-3-3-ζ. A first
injection of 2 μl was followed by 15 injections of 2.5 μl, with a stirring speed of 1500 rpm and a delay
between injections of 180 s. A blank titration was performed by
injecting 14-3-3-ζ into buffer to take the heat of dilution into account.
Experiments were repeated twice for each sample. Raw data were processed and
fitted with MicroCal Origin software using a one-site model where the error
function is calculated as the sum of the squared deviations between the data and
the model curve.For fluorescence polarization experiments, integrin tails were
labeled with fluorescein-5-maleimide (Invitrogen) linked to an engineered
C-terminal Cys residue. Measurements were performed using 96-well microplates
(Corning) in a PHERAstar FS microplate reader (BMG Labtech). Fluorescein-labeled
integrin tails at 1 μM concentration were excited at 485 nm, and polarization was recorded at 520 nm.
Crystallization, data collection and structure
determination
Samples for crystallization trials contained 10 mg/ml (0.35 mM) 14-3-3-ζ and 2.6 mg/ml
(0.7 mM) α4-30pS peptide in 20 mM Tris–HCl
and 50 mM NaCl (pH 7.5). Crystals were grown
by the sitting-drop vapor diffusion method at 4 °C using 1:1
ratios of sample and 0.1 M Na Hepes (pH 7.5)
and 25% polyethylene glycol 2000 monomethyl ether mother liquor. For data
collection, crystals were soaked in the same buffer plus 15% glycerol and flash
frozen in liquid nitrogen.Data were collected at the Diamond Light Source beamline I04-1;
the diffraction data extended to 2.2 Å resolution. Data were
indexed and integrated using MOSFLM and merged using SCALA from the CCP4 program
suite. A subset of approximately 5% of total
reflections were flagged for use in calculating
Rfree. Initial structure determination
was performed by molecular replacement using Phaser with Protein Data Bank entry
2O02 as the search model. Initial refinement
was performed with PHENIX, model building was performed with
Coot
and subsequent refinement was performed with BUSTER. The structure refined to a
satisfactory
Rwork/Rfree,
and the quality of the structure was assessed using MolProbity. Omit maps were
calculated using PHENIX.
Table 2 provides the
crystallographic data and refinement statistics. PyMOL and the PISA server from
European Bioinformatics Institute were used to analyze the structure and
prepare the structural figures.
Accession codes
Atomic coordinates for the 14-3-3-ζ/α4 phosphorylated peptide
complex have been deposited in the Protein Data Bank under accession number
4HKC, and
chemical shift resonance assignments for the α4 and β2 integrin cytoplasmic
domains have been deposited in the Biological Magnetic Resonance Bank under
accession numbers 18718 and 187191871818719.The following are the supplementary materials
related to this article.1433_a4_complexSupplementary Fig. 1.Supplementary Fig. 2.Supplementary Fig. 3.Supplementary Fig. 4.
Authors: A T Fuglsang; S Visconti; K Drumm; T Jahn; A Stensballe; B Mattei; O N Jensen; P Aducci; M G Palmgren Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 1999-12-17 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: D A Calderwood; A Huttenlocher; W B Kiosses; D M Rose; D G Woodside; M A Schwartz; M H Ginsberg Journal: Nat Cell Biol Date: 2001-12 Impact factor: 28.824
Authors: Airlie J McCoy; Ralf W Grosse-Kunstleve; Paul D Adams; Martyn D Winn; Laurent C Storoni; Randy J Read Journal: J Appl Crystallogr Date: 2007-07-13 Impact factor: 3.304
Authors: Sandeep Chhabra; Patrick Fischer; Koh Takeuchi; Abhinav Dubey; Joshua J Ziarek; Andras Boeszoermenyi; Daniel Mathieu; Wolfgang Bermel; Norman E Davey; Gerhard Wagner; Haribabu Arthanari Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2018-02-05 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Liisa M Uotila; Farhana Jahan; Laura Soto Hinojosa; Emiliano Melandri; Mikaela Grönholm; Carl G Gahmberg Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2014-10-02 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Alba Gigante; Eline Sijbesma; Pedro A Sánchez-Murcia; Xiaoyu Hu; David Bier; Sandra Bäcker; Shirley Knauer; Federico Gago; Christian Ottmann; Carsten Schmuck Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2020-02-11 Impact factor: 15.336
Authors: Panagiota Bouti; Steven D S Webbers; Susanna C Fagerholm; Ronen Alon; Markus Moser; Hanke L Matlung; Taco W Kuijpers Journal: Front Immunol Date: 2021-02-18 Impact factor: 7.561
Authors: Nicola De Franceschi; Antti Arjonen; Nadia Elkhatib; Konstantin Denessiouk; Antoni G Wrobel; Thomas A Wilson; Jeroen Pouwels; Guillaume Montagnac; David J Owen; Johanna Ivaska Journal: Nat Struct Mol Biol Date: 2016-01-18 Impact factor: 15.369