Literature DB >> 23763966

The association between prepregnancy parental support and control and adolescent girls' pregnancy resolution decisions.

Aubrey Spriggs Madkour1, Yiqiong Xie, Emily W Harville.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To examine the influence of prepregnancy parental support and control on adolescent girls' pregnancy resolution decisions.
METHODS: Data from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health were analyzed. Girls whose first pregnancy reported in wave IV occurred after wave I and before age 20 were included (n = 1,107). Participants self-reported pregnancy disposition (abortion, ectopic or tubal pregnancy, miscarriage, stillbirth, live birth) for each pregnancy; responses were dichotomized as abortion versus other. Girls' perceptions of parental support and control were measured at wave I. Controls were included for wave I age, age at pregnancy, year at the end of pregnancy, race/ethnicity, and parent characteristics (i.e., education, religious affiliation, age at first marriage, and educational expectations). Weighted multivariable logistic regression models were performed.
RESULTS: Approximately 18% of girls reporting a teen pregnancy reported having an abortion. In crude analyses, parental support was marginally negatively related to abortion (odds ratio [OR] = .83, p = .06) and parental control was significantly negatively related to abortion (OR = .78, p = .02). In multivariable analyses, higher parental control was significantly negatively related to abortion versus other pregnancy outcomes (adjusted OR .80, 95% confidence interval .66-.98). Perceived parental support was unassociated with pregnancy resolution decisions. The only other factor associated with abortion decisions was parent education: odds of choosing abortion versus other pregnancy outcomes were significantly higher for adolescent girls whose parents had a bachelor's degree or greater versus those with lower educational attainment.
CONCLUSIONS: Pregnant adolescents with less educated parents or parents exercising greater control were less likely to have an abortion.
Copyright © 2013 Society for Adolescent Health and Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Abortion; Adolescent pregnancy; Parent control; Parent support

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23763966      PMCID: PMC3755627          DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.04.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Adolesc Health        ISSN: 1054-139X            Impact factor:   5.012


  9 in total

1.  The influence of significant others on Australian teenagers' decisions about pregnancy resolution.

Authors:  A Evans
Journal:  Fam Plann Perspect       Date:  2001 Sep-Oct

2.  Examining the relationship between adolescent sexual risk-taking and perceptions of monitoring, communication, and parenting styles.

Authors:  Angela J Huebner; Laurie W Howell
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 5.012

3.  The effects of religious contextual norms, structural constraints, and personal religiosity on abortion decisions.

Authors:  Amy Adamczyk
Journal:  Soc Sci Res       Date:  2008-06

Review 4.  Teenage childbearing is not so bad after all...or is it? A review of the new literature.

Authors:  S D Hoffman
Journal:  Fam Plann Perspect       Date:  1998 Sep-Oct

5.  Predictors of birth weight and gestational age among adolescents.

Authors:  Emily W Harville; Aubrey Spriggs Madkour; Yiqiong Xie
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2012-10-01       Impact factor: 4.897

6.  Factors in the resolution of adolescent premarital pregnancies.

Authors:  E C Cooksey
Journal:  Demography       Date:  1990-05

7.  Intergenerational patterns of teenage fertility.

Authors:  J R Kahn; K E Anderson
Journal:  Demography       Date:  1992-02

8.  Parents' support and knowledge of their daughters' lives, and females' early sexual initiation in nine European countries.

Authors:  Aubrey Spriggs Madkour; Tilda Farhat; Carolyn Tucker Halpern; Saoirse Nic Gabhainn; Emmanuelle Godeau
Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2012-07-05

9.  Overadjustment bias and unnecessary adjustment in epidemiologic studies.

Authors:  Enrique F Schisterman; Stephen R Cole; Robert W Platt
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 4.822

  9 in total
  1 in total

1.  Engaging parents in digital sexual and reproductive health education: evidence from the JACK trial.

Authors:  Áine Aventin; Aisling Gough; Theresa McShane; Kathryn Gillespie; Liam O'Hare; Honor Young; Ruth Lewis; Emily Warren; Kelly Buckley; Maria Lohan
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2020-08-27       Impact factor: 3.355

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.