BACKGROUND: We aimed to develop a risk score incorporating heart rate variability (HRV) and traditional vital signs for the prediction of early mortality and complications in patients during the initial presentation to the emergency department (ED) with chest pain. METHODS: We conducted a prospective observational study of patients with a primary complaint of chest pain at the ED of a tertiary hospital. The primary outcome was a composite of mortality, cardiac arrest, ventricular tachycardia, hypotension requiring inotropes or intraaortic balloon pump insertion, intubation or mechanical ventilation, complete heart block, bradycardia requiring pacing, and recurrent ischemia requiring revascularization, all within 72 hours of arrival at ED. RESULTS: Three hundred nine patients were recruited, and 25 patients met the primary outcome. Backwards stepwise logistic regression was used to derive a scoring model that included heart rate, systolic blood pressure, respiratory rate, and low frequency to high frequency ratio. For predicting complications within 72 hours, the risk score performed with an area under the curve of 0.835 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.749-0.920); and a cutoff of 4 and higher in the risk score gave a sensitivity of 0.880 (95% CI, 0.677-0.968), specificity of 0.680 (95% CI, 0.621-0.733), positive predictive value of 0.195, and negative predictive value of 0.985. The risk score performed better than ST elevation/depression and troponin T in predicting complications within 72 hours. CONCLUSION: A risk score incorporating heart rate variability and vital signs performed well in predicting mortality and other complications within 72 hours after arrival at ED in patients with chest pain.
BACKGROUND: We aimed to develop a risk score incorporating heart rate variability (HRV) and traditional vital signs for the prediction of early mortality and complications in patients during the initial presentation to the emergency department (ED) with chest pain. METHODS: We conducted a prospective observational study of patients with a primary complaint of chest pain at the ED of a tertiary hospital. The primary outcome was a composite of mortality, cardiac arrest, ventricular tachycardia, hypotension requiring inotropes or intraaortic balloon pump insertion, intubation or mechanical ventilation, complete heart block, bradycardia requiring pacing, and recurrent ischemia requiring revascularization, all within 72 hours of arrival at ED. RESULTS: Three hundred nine patients were recruited, and 25 patients met the primary outcome. Backwards stepwise logistic regression was used to derive a scoring model that included heart rate, systolic blood pressure, respiratory rate, and low frequency to high frequency ratio. For predicting complications within 72 hours, the risk score performed with an area under the curve of 0.835 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.749-0.920); and a cutoff of 4 and higher in the risk score gave a sensitivity of 0.880 (95% CI, 0.677-0.968), specificity of 0.680 (95% CI, 0.621-0.733), positive predictive value of 0.195, and negative predictive value of 0.985. The risk score performed better than ST elevation/depression and troponin T in predicting complications within 72 hours. CONCLUSION: A risk score incorporating heart rate variability and vital signs performed well in predicting mortality and other complications within 72 hours after arrival at ED in patients with chest pain.
Authors: K Boehm; M Duckheim; L Mizera; P Groga-Bada; N Malek; F Kreth; M Gawaz; C S Zuern; C Eick Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2018-04-12 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Rose Mary Ferreira Lisboa da Silva; Carlos Augusto Bueno Silva; Otaviano José Greco; Maria da Consolação Vieira Moreira Journal: Arq Bras Cardiol Date: 2014-07-15 Impact factor: 2.000
Authors: Nan Liu; Zhi Xiong Koh; Junyang Goh; Zhiping Lin; Benjamin Haaland; Boon Ping Ting; Marcus Eng Hock Ong Journal: BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Date: 2014-08-23 Impact factor: 2.796
Authors: Nan Liu; Marcel Lucas Chee; Zhi Xiong Koh; Su Li Leow; Andrew Fu Wah Ho; Dagang Guo; Marcus Eng Hock Ong Journal: BMC Med Res Methodol Date: 2021-04-17 Impact factor: 4.615
Authors: Vincent So; Marielle Balanaser; Gregory Klar; Jordan Leitch; Michael McGillion; P J Devereaux; Ramiro Arellano; Joel Parlow; Ian Gilron Journal: Pain Rep Date: 2021-12-02
Authors: Micah Liam Arthur Heldeweg; Nan Liu; Zhi Xiong Koh; Stephanie Fook-Chong; Weng Kit Lye; Mark Harms; Marcus Eng Hock Ong Journal: Crit Care Date: 2016-06-11 Impact factor: 9.097