Literature DB >> 23763610

'Multicopy multivalent' glycopolymer-stabilized gold nanoparticles as potential synthetic cancer vaccines.

Alison L Parry1, Natasha A Clemson, James Ellis, Stefan S R Bernhard, Benjamin G Davis, Neil R Cameron.   

Abstract

Mucin-related carbohydrates are overexpressed on the surface of cancer cells, providing a disease-specific target for cancer immunotherapy. Here, we describe the design and construction of peptide-free multivalent glycosylated nanoscale constructs as potential synthetic cancer vaccines that generate significant titers of antibodies selective for aberrant mucin glycans. A polymerizable version of the Tn-antigen glycan was prepared and converted into well-defined glycopolymers by Reversible Addition-Fragmentation chain Transfer (RAFT) polymerization. The polymers were then conjugated to gold nanoparticles, yielding 'multicopy-multivalent' nanoscale glycoconjugates. Immunological studies indicated that these nanomaterials generated strong and long-lasting production of antibodies that are selective to the Tn-antigen glycan and cross-reactive toward mucin proteins displaying Tn. The results demonstrate proof-of-concept of a simple and modular approach toward synthetic anticancer vaccines based on multivalent glycosylated nanomaterials without the need for a typical vaccine protein component.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23763610      PMCID: PMC3928990          DOI: 10.1021/ja4046857

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Chem Soc        ISSN: 0002-7863            Impact factor:   15.419


Healthy cells of the mammary gland are characterized by the surface presentation of branched, O-linked core 2 glycans containing high levels of N-acetyl-d-glucosamine (GlcNAc). However, proteins on the surface of breast cancer cells instead present mainly linear, truncated core 1 mucin-type glycans such as α-N-acetyl-d-galactosamine (αGalNAc, the Tn-antigen glycan) (Figure 1), with complete or near-complete absence of core 2 residues.[1] These differences have been targeted as a strategy for cancer immunotherapy.[2] Accordingly, multivalent glycoconjugates have been prepared in which mucin glycans are presented on a variety of scaffolds, including peptides,[3] lipopeptides,[4] dendrimers[5] and proteins.[6] Some of these approaches have developed as far as clinical trials.[7]
Figure 1

Overview of approach to develop gold nanoparticle-based synthetic anticancer vaccines. Breast cancer cells express aberrant mucins displaying Core 1 glycans such as the Tn-antigen glycan. This ‘multicopy-multivalent’ presentation is mimicked by displaying Tn-antigen glycan glycopolymers on the surface of nanoparticles.

Overview of approach to develop gold nanoparticle-based synthetic anticancer vaccines. Breast cancer cells express aberrant mucins displaying Core 1 glycans such as the Tn-antigen glycan. This ‘multicopy-multivalent’ presentation is mimicked by displaying Tn-antigen glycan glycopolymers on the surface of nanoparticles. Nanomaterials represent an alternative platform for the presentation of glycans[8] that allow greater synthetic control and higher density than on current protein scaffolds. Carbohydrate-presenting gold nanoparticles (AuNPs)[9] decorated with small molecule thiolated glycans have been used as tools to study carbohydrate–carbohydrate interactions,[10] in antiadhesive therapy,[11] and as anti-HIV[12] and cancer vaccine candidates.[13] However, these typically monomolecular sugar coatings do not represent well the structure of mucin glycoproteins, which feature a dense presentation of glycans attached to a protein backbone. We hypothesized that presenting core 1 glycans such as αGalNAc in a ‘multicopy-multivalent’ manner[14] might produce a nanoparticle with a surface that mimics much more closely the surface of cancer cells which engage the surface receptors of cells of the immune system, and thus produce an effective synthetic vaccine (Figure 1). Novel Tn glycan monomer 2 was synthesized using a nonparticipatory glycosyl donor sugar reactant to create the desired α-anomeric stereochemistry (Figure 2).[15] α-Glycosylation of the linker moiety with glycosyl donor 1 in diethyl ether/DCM gave the azido-glycoside in 87%. Following successful attachment of the sugar precursor, the azide functionality was converted to acetamide using a one-pot Staudinger reduction[16]-acetylation procedure. The unwanted β-anomer was readily removed to give linked pure α-glycoside. Selective methanolysis followed by careful neutralization allowed removal of the acetate protecting groups to yield the pure Tn α-anomer 2. In this way, gram quantities of the polymerizable antigen building block were readily generated.
Figure 2

Preparation and characterization of Tn-antigen gold nanoparticles (for abbreviations see Supporting Information). Reagents, conditions and yields: (i) NaN3, CAN, CH3CN, −20 °C, 30 h, 80%; (ii) PhSH, DiPEA, CH3CN, 1 h, 72%; (iii) K2CO3, CCl3CN, dichloromethane (DCM), 8 h, 62%; (iv) HEMAm, TMSOTf, Et3N, Et2O/DCM (2:1), −20 °C, 30 min, 80%; (v) DPPE, DCM, 1 h then Ac2O, DMAP, Et3N, H+ resin, 55% α-anomer; (vi) K2CO3, MeOH, 65%; (vii) PEGMA, CPADB, ACVA, 70 °C, 48 h, 51–75%. Insets show representative dynamic light scattering data (top) and TEM image (bottom) for glyconanoparticles (scale bar = 20 nm).

Preparation and characterization of Tn-antigen gold nanoparticles (for abbreviations see Supporting Information). Reagents, conditions and yields: (i) NaN3, CAN, CH3CN, −20 °C, 30 h, 80%; (ii) PhSH, DiPEA, CH3CN, 1 h, 72%; (iii) K2CO3, CCl3CN, dichloromethane (DCM), 8 h, 62%; (iv) HEMAm, TMSOTf, Et3N, Et2O/DCM (2:1), −20 °C, 30 min, 80%; (v) DPPE, DCM, 1 h then Ac2O, DMAP, Et3N, H+ resin, 55% α-anomer; (vi) K2CO3, MeOH, 65%; (vii) PEGMA, CPADB, ACVA, 70 °C, 48 h, 51–75%. Insets show representative dynamic light scattering data (top) and TEM image (bottom) for glyconanoparticles (scale bar = 20 nm). Controlled glycopolymers were prepared by Reversible Addition–Fragmentation chain Transfer (RAFT) polymerization.[17] Polymers of varied length and composition could be prepared (Table 1) by varying feedstock composition, ratios and conditions. First, a Tn-antigen glycan monocomponent homopolymer was created in an optimum yield of 65% in a solvent mixture of DMF:H2O (7:3). The resulting polymer was analyzed by SEC and possessed a number-average molecular weight (Mn) of 14.2 kDa and a polydispersity index (PDI) of 1.16 (see Table 1). Next, the Tn-antigen glycan monomer 2 and poly(ethylene glycol) methyl ether methacrylate (PEGMA; Mn = 300 Da) were copolymerized at varying comonomer feedstock ratios, with [total monomer]0/[CTA]0 ratios of 100/1 and 50/1, and after 48 h all proceeded with excellent overall conversion (see Table 1). The number- and weight-average molecular weights (Mn and Mw) determined by SEC were in good to excellent agreement with those predicted and the PDIs ranged from 1.12 to 1.23.
Table 1

Data for the Synthesis and Characterization of Glyconanoparticles

polymeraconv yield Mn, ThMnPDIdDhFAu[Pol] [Tn] 
 (%)b(%)(kDa)c(kDa)d (nm)e(%)f(mmol)g(mmol)h
Tn50655211.114.21.1616344.7 × 10–52.3 × 10–3
PEG40Tn1099, 95i7315.315.01.1225614.1 × 10–52.0 × 10–4
PEG25Tn2590, 70i5912.916.91.1813453.3 × 10–52.0 × 10–4
PEG80Tn2099, 75i6829.040.41.15962.3 × 10–53.0 × 10–4
PEG50Tn5099, 75i7527.730.41.187212.6 × 10–51.0 × 10–3

PEG = poly(ethyleneglycol) methyl ether methacrylate, Tn = Tn-antigen glycan monomer 2, subscript = target degree of polymerization.

Determined by 1H NMR spectroscopy by comparison of the integrals of the monomer alkene peaks to a selected polymer peak in the spectrum of the crude polymer.

Theoretical Mn, at observed conversion, determined from [monomer]0:[CTA]0;

.

Determined by SEC.

Mean hydrodynamic diameter determined by dynamic light scattering.

Mass fraction of Au per mg of nanoparticle, determined by thermogravimetric analysis.

Quantity of polymer per mg of nanoparticle, determined by thermogravimetric analysis.

Quantity of Tn-antigen glycan per mg of nanoparticle, determined by thermogravimetric analysis.

Values refer to copolymer first and second block, respectively.

PEG = poly(ethyleneglycol) methyl ether methacrylate, Tn = Tn-antigen glycan monomer 2, subscript = target degree of polymerization. Determined by 1H NMR spectroscopy by comparison of the integrals of the monomer alkene peaks to a selected polymer peak in the spectrum of the crude polymer. Theoretical Mn, at observed conversion, determined from [monomer]0:[CTA]0; . Determined by SEC. Mean hydrodynamic diameter determined by dynamic light scattering. Mass fraction of Au per mg of nanoparticle, determined by thermogravimetric analysis. Quantity of polymer per mg of nanoparticle, determined by thermogravimetric analysis. Quantity of Tn-antigen glycan per mg of nanoparticle, determined by thermogravimetric analysis. Values refer to copolymer first and second block, respectively. Sodium borohydride was then used to reduce simultaneously HAuCl4 to Au0 and the dithioester end groups of the RAFT polymers to thiol,[18] thereby forming a range of Tn-antigen glycan nanoparticles (polyTn-NPs) in situ (Figure 2 and Table 1). The polymer coronas of these particles varied in Tn glycan density (20, 50, and 100 mol %) and polymer DPn (50 or 100 units). The size of the nanoparticles was confirmed by dynamic light scattering (DLS) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) (Figures 2, S1 and S2). All samples contained a narrow size distribution of particles of diameter between 5 and 20 nm, except for PEG40Tn10 which resulted in a polydisperse sample (Figures S1 and S2). Determination of antigen and polymer loading using thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) indicated that not only could loading be tuned, but also that the use of longer polymer chains allowed the creation of smaller nanoparticles (Table 1, entries 4 and 5) with a lower mass fraction of gold core. The Tn-antigen glycan presenting nanoparticles were analyzed for their efficacy and ability to induce an immune response in vivo. New Zealand White rabbits (n = 3) were immunized at days 0, 14, 28, and 56 with either polyTn-NP or free polymer solution. Serum samples were taken at day 0 (preimmune bleed), 42 and 70 and antibodies present were quantified using an ELISA assay against the synthetic antigens. The results are presented in Figure 3a. The free polymers gave low or negligible response, whereas all glyconanoparticles generated a higher response that increased over time as judged by antibody (IgG) titers. Examination of the data in Figure 3a reveals a strong influence of nanoparticle composition on immunological properties. The highest titers were observed for AuNPs prepared with the polymers PEG25Tn25 and PEG80Tn20, with weaker responses observed for PEG40Tn10 and PEG50Tn50 (subscript denotes number average block length). The polydispersity of PEG40Tn10 may reduce its stability in vivo and hence produce lower titers than the other particles.
Figure 3

Box plots showing results of immunological experiments with glyconanoparticles and glycopolymers. (a) Serum antibody (IgG) titers (ELISA); (b) cross-reactivity of serum antibodies (ELISA) with mucins. Tn = Tn-antigen glycan (α-GalNAc), sTn = sialylated Tn; polymer key as in Table 1.

Box plots showing results of immunological experiments with glyconanoparticles and glycopolymers. (a) Serum antibody (IgG) titers (ELISA); (b) cross-reactivity of serum antibodies (ELISA) with mucins. Tn = Tn-antigen glycan (α-GalNAc), sTn = sialylated Tn; polymer key as in Table 1. The relationship observed between carbohydrate density and immune response is notable. It appears that the optimum Tn-antigen glycan density is 20–25 units per polymer chain, regardless of chain length. Antigen induced cross-linking of B cell receptors leads to B cell activation and antibody production, whereas cross-linking with coreceptors can either increase or suppress B cell response.[19] It is likely that the glycoconjugate carbohydrate density has a strong influence on the subtle interplay between these factors and therefore on the production of antibodies. Barchi et al. have prepared glycosylated gold nanoparticles bearing the Thomson-Friedenreich (TF) antigen and demonstrated moderate antibody responses.[13b] Direct comparison with their data is difficult since optical density values rather than serial dilution titers were reported; nonetheless, it seems that the maximum response of our nanoparticles is of the same order of magnitude. To probe the ability of the nanoparticle-generated antibodies to recognize naturally occurring antigens, cross-reactivity with different mucin glycoproteins bearing the Tn-antigen was investigated. Bovine submaxillary mucin (BSM) is known to contain significant levels of sialylated Tn-residues (sTn),[20] which can be desialylated readily to expose Tn.[21] Serum samples (days 0 and 70) from immunization with glyconanoparticles presenting very different polymers PEG25Tn25 and PEG80Tn20 were reacted with mucins bearing Tn-antigen glycans in different forms (Figure 3b). While no or little detectable cross-reactivity was seen in day 0 samples, all experiments with 70 day samples indicated the presence of detectable levels of antibodies specific for naturally occurring mucin glycans. Interestingly, serum generated in the presence of each nanoparticle type showed the ability to bind the Tn-antigen glycan in both terminal and nonterminal context. We have described the synthesis of ‘multicopy-multivalent’ nanoparticles decorated with tumor-associated (Tn) antigen glycans and have shown that these generate a significant immune response in vivo, with promising indications that the antibodies generated are capable of recognizing natural Tn-antigen glycans and mammalian-mucin glycoproteins. While the absolute titers reported here are lower than those obtained with glycoconjugates based on protein toxin platforms,[22] the ability to create fully synthetic protein- and peptide-free glycoconjugate vaccines through layered multivalent display is the first of its kind.
  39 in total

Review 1.  B cell antigen receptor signaling 101.

Authors:  Joseph M Dal Porto; Stephen B Gauld; Kevin T Merrell; David Mills; Aimee E Pugh-Bernard; John Cambier
Journal:  Mol Immunol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 4.407

Review 2.  MUC1 immunotherapy.

Authors:  Richard E Beatson; Joyce Taylor-Papadimitriou; Joy M Burchell
Journal:  Immunotherapy       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 4.196

3.  Towards a fully synthetic carbohydrate-based anticancer vaccine: synthesis and immunological evaluation of a lipidated glycopeptide containing the tumor-associated tn antigen.

Authors:  Therese Buskas; Sampat Ingale; Geert-Jan Boons
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2005-09-19       Impact factor: 15.336

4.  Glyconanoparticles allow pre-symptomatic in vivo imaging of brain disease.

Authors:  Sander I van Kasteren; Sandra J Campbell; Sébastien Serres; Daniel C Anthony; Nicola R Sibson; Benjamin G Davis
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-12-23       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Synthetic vaccines consisting of tumor-associated MUC1 glycopeptide antigens and a T-cell epitope for the induction of a highly specific humoral immune response.

Authors:  Ulrika Westerlind; Alexandra Hobel; Nikola Gaidzik; Edgar Schmitt; Horst Kunz
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 15.336

6.  Immunization of metastatic breast cancer patients with a fully synthetic globo H conjugate: a phase I trial.

Authors:  T Gilewski; G Ragupathi; S Bhuta; L J Williams; C Musselli; X F Zhang; W G Bornmann; M Spassova; K P Bencsath; K S Panageas; J Chin; C A Hudis; L Norton; A N Houghton; P O Livingston; S J Danishefsky
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-03-13       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Immunization of ovarian cancer patients with a synthetic Lewis(y)-protein conjugate vaccine: a phase 1 trial.

Authors:  P J Sabbatini; V Kudryashov; G Ragupathi; S J Danishefsky; P O Livingston; W Bornmann; M Spassova; A Zatorski; D Spriggs; C Aghajanian; S Soignet; M Peyton; C O'Flaherty; J Curtin; K O Lloyd
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2000-07-01       Impact factor: 7.396

8.  From the Laboratory to the Clinic: A Retrospective on Fully Synthetic Carbohydrate-Based Anticancer Vaccines Frequently used abbreviations are listed in the appendix.

Authors: 
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 15.336

9.  Robust immune responses elicited by a fully synthetic three-component vaccine.

Authors:  Sampat Ingale; Margreet A Wolfert; Jidnyasa Gaekwad; Therese Buskas; Geert-Jan Boons
Journal:  Nat Chem Biol       Date:  2007-09-02       Impact factor: 15.040

10.  Toward living radical polymerization.

Authors:  Graeme Moad; Ezio Rizzardo; San H Thang
Journal:  Acc Chem Res       Date:  2008-08-14       Impact factor: 22.384

View more
  38 in total

1.  Carbohydrate antigen delivery by water soluble copolymers as potential anti-cancer vaccines.

Authors:  Qian Qin; Zhaojun Yin; Philip Bentley; Xuefei Huang
Journal:  Medchemcomm       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 3.597

Review 2.  Nanoparticle systems for cancer vaccine.

Authors:  Ru Wen; Afoma C Umeano; Yi Kou; Jian Xu; Ammad Ahmad Farooqi
Journal:  Nanomedicine (Lond)       Date:  2019-02-26       Impact factor: 5.307

Review 3.  Pathobiological implications of mucin glycans in cancer: Sweet poison and novel targets.

Authors:  Seema Chugh; Vinayaga S Gnanapragassam; Maneesh Jain; Satyanarayana Rachagani; Moorthy P Ponnusamy; Surinder K Batra
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2015-08-28

4.  In vitro and in vivo antitumor effects of 50 to 100-KDa components from B16 melanoma culture supernatant.

Authors:  Ying-Song Qin; X U Zhang; Xiang-Yu Zhang
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 2.967

5.  Pre-clinical development of Listeria-based nanovaccines as immunotherapies for solid tumours: insights from melanoma.

Authors:  Hector Terán-Navarro; Ricardo Calderon-Gonzalez; David Salcines-Cuevas; Isabel García; Marco Marradi; Javier Freire; Erwan Salmon; Mar Portillo-Gonzalez; Elisabet Frande-Cabanes; Almudena García-Castaño; Virginia Martinez-Callejo; Javier Gomez-Roman; Raquel Tobes; Fernando Rivera; Sonsoles Yañez-Diaz; Carmen Álvarez-Domínguez
Journal:  Oncoimmunology       Date:  2018-11-10       Impact factor: 8.110

6.  Toward Personalized Peptide-Based Cancer Nanovaccines: A Facile and Versatile Synthetic Approach.

Authors:  Hamilton Kakwere; Elizabeth S Ingham; Riley Allen; Lisa M Mahakian; Sarah M Tam; Hua Zhang; Matthew T Silvestrini; Jamal S Lewis; Katherine W Ferrara
Journal:  Bioconjug Chem       Date:  2017-10-13       Impact factor: 4.774

7.  Enhancing both CT imaging and natural killer cell-mediated cancer cell killing by a GD2-targeting nanoconstruct.

Authors:  Peifu Jiao; Mario Otto; Qiaohong Geng; Chencan Li; Faming Li; Elizabeth R Butch; Scott E Snyder; Hongyu Zhou; Bing Yan
Journal:  J Mater Chem B       Date:  2015-12-07       Impact factor: 6.331

8.  Lipopeptide-Coated Iron Oxide Nanoparticles as Potential Glycoconjugate-Based Synthetic Anticancer Vaccines.

Authors:  Suttipun Sungsuwan; Zhaojun Yin; Xuefei Huang
Journal:  ACS Appl Mater Interfaces       Date:  2015-08-03       Impact factor: 9.229

9.  Valency and density matter: Deciphering impacts of immunogen structures on immune responses against a tumor associated carbohydrate antigen using synthetic glycopolymers.

Authors:  Qian Qin; Zhaojun Yin; Xuanjun Wu; Karen M Haas; Xuefei Huang
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2016-06-02       Impact factor: 12.479

10.  Chemical Synthesis of GM2 Glycans, Bioconjugation with Bacteriophage Qβ, and the Induction of Anticancer Antibodies.

Authors:  Zhaojun Yin; Steven Dulaney; Craig S McKay; Claire Baniel; Katarzyna Kaczanowska; Sherif Ramadan; M G Finn; Xuefei Huang
Journal:  Chembiochem       Date:  2015-12-04       Impact factor: 3.164

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.