John K Williams1, Dorie A Glover, Gail E Wyatt, Kimberly Kisler, Honghu Liu, Muyu Zhang. 1. University of California, Los Angeles, Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, 760 Westwood Plaza, 38-260, Los Angeles, CA 90024-1759, USA. keoniwmd@aol.com
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: HIV transmission risk is high among men who have sex with men and women (MSMW), and it is further heightened by a history of childhood sexual abuse (CSA) and current traumatic stress or depression. Yet, traumatic stress is rarely addressed in HIV interventions. We tested a stress-focused sexual risk reduction intervention for African American MSMW with CSA histories. METHODS: This randomized controlled trial compared a stress-focused sexual risk reduction intervention with a general health promotion intervention. Sexual risk behaviors, psychological symptoms, stress biomarkers (urinary cortisol and catecholamines), and neopterin (an indicator of HIV progression) were assessed at baseline and at 3- and 6-month follow-ups. RESULTS: Both interventions decreased and sustained reductions in sexual risk and psychological symptoms. The stress-focused intervention was more efficacious than the general health promotion intervention in decreasing unprotected anal insertive sex and reducing depression symptoms. Despite randomization, baseline group differences in CSA severity, psychological symptoms, and biomarkers were found and linked to subsequent intervention outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Although interventions designed specifically for HIV-positive African American MSMW can lead to improvements in health outcomes, future research is needed to examine factors that influence intervention effects.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVES: HIV transmission risk is high among men who have sex with men and women (MSMW), and it is further heightened by a history of childhood sexual abuse (CSA) and current traumatic stress or depression. Yet, traumatic stress is rarely addressed in HIV interventions. We tested a stress-focused sexual risk reduction intervention for African American MSMW with CSA histories. METHODS: This randomized controlled trial compared a stress-focused sexual risk reduction intervention with a general health promotion intervention. Sexual risk behaviors, psychological symptoms, stress biomarkers (urinary cortisol and catecholamines), and neopterin (an indicator of HIV progression) were assessed at baseline and at 3- and 6-month follow-ups. RESULTS: Both interventions decreased and sustained reductions in sexual risk and psychological symptoms. The stress-focused intervention was more efficacious than the general health promotion intervention in decreasing unprotected anal insertive sex and reducing depression symptoms. Despite randomization, baseline group differences in CSA severity, psychological symptoms, and biomarkers were found and linked to subsequent intervention outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Although interventions designed specifically for HIV-positive African American MSMW can lead to improvements in health outcomes, future research is needed to examine factors that influence intervention effects.
Authors: David W Pantalone; Kimberly M Nelson; Abigail W Batchelder; Christopher Chiu; Hamish A Gunn; Keith J Horvath Journal: J Sex Res Date: 2020-02-20
Authors: Lisa B Hightow-Weidman; Sara LeGrand; Kathryn E Muessig; Ryan A Simmons; Karina Soni; Seul Ki Choi; Helene Kirschke-Schwartz; Joseph R Egger Journal: AIDS Behav Date: 2019-05
Authors: Martin J Downing; Ellen Benoit; Dominique Brown; Lauren Coe; Sabina Hirshfield; Louis Pansulla; Alex Carballo-Diéguez Journal: J Child Sex Abus Date: 2019-11-07
Authors: John K Williams; Leo Wilton; Manya Magnus; Lei Wang; Jing Wang; Typhanye Penniman Dyer; Beryl A Koblin; Christopher Hucks-Ortiz; Sheldon D Fields; Steve Shoptaw; Rob Stephenson; Conall O'Cleirigh; Vanessa Cummings Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2015-10-15 Impact factor: 9.308