| Literature DB >> 23762841 |
Grammatiki S Kanini1, Efstathios A Katsifas, Alexandros L Savvides, Amalia D Karagouni.
Abstract
Many studies have shown that several Greek ecosystems inhabit very interesting bacteria with biotechnological properties. Therefore Streptomyces isolates from diverse Greek habitats were selected for their antifungal activity against the common phytopathogenic fungus Fusarium oxysporum. The isolate encoded ACTA1551, member of Streptomyces genus, could strongly suppress the fungal growth when examined in antagonistic bioassays in vitro. The isolate was found phylogenetically relative to Streptomyces rochei after analyzing its 16S rDNA sequence. The influence of different environmental conditions, such as medium composition, temperature, and pH on the expression of the antifungal activity was thoroughly examined. Streptomyces rochei ACTA1551 was able to protect tomato seeds from F. oxysporum infection in vivo while it was shown to promote the growth of tomato plants when the pathogen was absent. In an initial effort towards the elucidation of the biochemical and physiological nature of ACTA1551 antifungal activity, extracts from solid streptomycete cultures under antagonistic or/and not antagonistic conditions were concentrated and fractionated. The metabolites involved in the antagonistic action of the isolate showed to be more than one and produced independently of the presence of the pathogen. The above observations could support the application of Streptomyces rochei ACTA1551 as biocontrol agent against F. oxysporum.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23762841 PMCID: PMC3671524 DOI: 10.1155/2013/387230
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Streptomyces strains with antifungal activity originated from twelve studied Greek habitats.
| Sampling area | Number of isolates tested | Number (percentage) of isolates with antifungal activity against |
|---|---|---|
| (A) Rhizosphere samples | ||
| (1) Rhizosphere of | 28 | 3 (10.7%) {2.36; 1.3; 1.5} |
| (2) Rhizosphere of | 42 | 1 (2.4%) {1.96; 1.96; 1.96} |
| (3) Rhizosphere of | 73 | 6 (8.2%) {2.57; 2.13; 1.34} |
| (4) Rhizosphere of | 20 | 3 (15.0%) {4.84; 3.26; 1.56} |
| (5) Rhizosphere of evergreen woody shrubs from an island of the Aegean Sea | 21 | 5 (23.8%) {2.69; 1.87; 1.47} |
| (6) Rhizosphere of evergreen woody shrubs from an island of the Ionian Sea | 28 | 0 (0.0%) |
| (7) Rhizosphere of coniferous trees (Arcadian forest) | 84 | 6 (7.1%) {2.91; 2.05; 1.56} |
| Rhizosphere subtotals |
|
|
| (B) Nonrhizosphere samples | ||
| (8) Hot spring water of Thermopiles thermal springs (Viotia district) | 22 | 2 (9.1%) {1.63; 1.46; 1.28} |
| (9) Sediment from a volcanic area (Santorini island—Aegean sea) | 5 | 1 (20%) {1.3; 1.3; 1.3} |
| (10) Soil derived from cultivated area (Marathon, Attica district) | 179 | 10 (5.6%) {2.25; 1.6; 1.25} |
| (11) Soil from protected natural forest area (Kessariani, Attica District) | 26 | 2 (7.7%) {1.39; 1.37; 1.34} |
| Nonrhizosphere subtotals |
|
|
|
| ||
| Total |
|
|
1Antagonistic activity levels as expressed by the quotient of the inhibition zone area over streptomycete colony area (See Section 2.2).
Figure 1Phylogenetic tree of the 16S rDNA based on the neighbour-joining method, showing the position of the Streptomyces rochei ACTA1551. One thousand bootstrap analyses (distance) were conducted. The tree was rooted with Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Scale bar represents 2% estimated distance.
Figure 2Influence of temperature, pH value, and media on the strength of antifungal activity expressed from ACTA1551 (Streptomyces rochei) on Fusarium oxysporum; (a) temperature effect, (b) pH effect, (c) carbon and nitrogen source effect.
Germination data of tomato seeds during in vivo antagonism bioassays. The total number of planted tomato seeds was (20 per pot) × (three replicates for each pot) × (four independent experiments) = 240. All experimental data were combined for the analysis.
| Soil infected with | Soil not infected with | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of planted tomato seeds | Number of germinated tomato seeds | Germination percentage1 | Number of planted tomato seeds | Number of germinated tomato seeds | Germination percentage1 | |
| Seeds treated with ACTA1551 | 240 | 181 ± 2 | 75% | 240 | 218 ± 2.2 | 90% |
| Untreated tomato seeds | 240 | 108 ± 1 | 45% | 240 | 228 ± 1.9 | 95% |
1Unpaired t-test on the number of germinated seeds: seeds treated with ACTA1551 in infected soil versus untreated tomato seeds in infected soil were significantly different (P < 0.001); seeds treated with ACTA1551 in noninfected soil versus untreated tomato seeds in noninfected soil were significantly different (P < 0.001).
Mean height and weight data of tomato plants derived from emerged tomato seeds during in vivo antagonism bioassays. The total number of planted tomato seeds was (24 per pot) × (three replicates for each pot) × (four independent experiments) = 288. All experimental data were combined for the analysis.
| Soil infected with | Soil not infected with | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean height (cm)1 | Mean weight (g)2 | Mean height (cm)1 | Mean weight (g)2 | |
| Seeds treated with ACTA1551 | 13.42 ± 0.1 | 0.58 ± 0.01 | 19 ± 0.2 | 0.79 ± 0.01 |
| Untreated tomato seeds | 11.16 ± 0.1 | 0.35 ± 0.01 | 15.01 ± 0.1 | 0.51 ± 0.01 |
1Unpaired t-test on plant heights: seeds treated with ACTA1551 in infected soil versus untreated tomato seeds in infected soil were significantly different (P < 0.001); seeds treated with ACTA1551 in noninfected soil versus untreated tomato seeds in noninfected soil were significantly different (P < 0.001).
2Unpaired t-test on plant weights: seeds treated with ACTA1551 in infected soil versus untreated tomato seeds in infected soil significantly different (P < 0.001); seeds treated with ACTA1551 in noninfected soil versus untreated tomato seeds in noninfected soil were significantly different (P < 0.001).
Figure 3In vivo antifungal ability of ACTA1551 (Streptomyces rochei). Growth of the tomato plants (from left to right). (a) Untreated seed planted in untreated sterile soil (positive control), (b) seed treated with ACTA1551 (Streptomyces rochei) and planted in F. oxysporum infected soil, (c) seed treated with ACTA1551 (Streptomyces rochei) and planted in F. oxysporum noninfected soil, (d) untreated seed planted in R. solani DSM843 infected soil (negative control).
Figure 4(a) Antifungal activity of the concentrated medium extracts derived from the solid culture of Streptomyces rochei ACTA1551 with or without F. oxysporum. Inhibition zone caused from (i) Streptomyces rochei ACTA1551 culture extract when F. oxysporum is present, (ii) Streptomyces rochei ACTA1551 culture extract when F. oxysporum is absent, (iii) Streptomyces rochei ACTA1551 low molecular weight fractions, (iv) Streptomyces rochei ACTA1551 high molecular weight fractions and negative control (no streptomycete extract added) (v). (b) Antifungal activity of the concentrated medium extracts derived from the solid culture of Streptomyces rochei ACTA1551 against E. coli.