| Literature DB >> 23762760 |
Sofía Borrego1, Oderlaise Valdés, Isbel Vivar, Paola Lavin, Patricia Guiamet, Patricia Battistoni, Sandra Gómez de Saravia, Pedro Borges.
Abstract
Natural products obtained from plants with biocidal activity represent an alternative and useful source in the control of biodeterioration of documentary heritage, without negative environmental and human impacts. In this work, we studied the antimicrobial activity of seven essential oils against microorganisms associated with the biodeterioration of documentary heritage. The essential oils were obtained by steam distillation. The antimicrobial activity was analyzed using the agar diffusion method against 4 strains of fungi and 6 bacterial strains isolated from repositories air and documents of the National Archive of the Republic of Cuba and the Historical Archive of the Museum of La Plata, Argentina. Anise and garlic oils showed the best antifungal activity at all concentrations studied, while oregano oil not only was effective against fungi tested but also prevented sporulation of them all. Orange sweet and laurel oils were ineffective against fungi. Clove, garlic, and oregano oils showed the highest antibacterial activity at 25% against Enterobacter agglomerans and Streptomyces sp., while only clove and oregano oils were effective against Bacillus sp. at all concentrations studied. This study has an important implication for the possible use of the natural products from plants in the control of biodeterioration of documentary heritage.Entities:
Year: 2012 PMID: 23762760 PMCID: PMC3671688 DOI: 10.5402/2012/826786
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ISRN Microbiol
List of essential oils tested and the major components detected in each one.
| Common name | Botanical correspondence | Percentage composition of major components |
|---|---|---|
| Anise seed |
| Anethole (80.8%), methyl chavicol (2.5%), methyl eugenol (2.4%), linalool (2.3%), and acetanisole (2.0%) |
|
| ||
| Clove |
| Eugenol (67.0%), eugenyl acetate (18.1%), methyl |
|
| ||
| Cumin |
| Cuminaldehyde (43.3%), cuminal (20.4%), |
|
| ||
| Garlic |
| Di-2-propenyl trisulfide (31.9%), methyl 2-propenyl trisulfide (21.7%), di-2-propenyl disulfide (20.7%), di-2-propenyl sulfide (7.9%), methyl 2-propenyl disulfide (5.6%), methyl 2-propenyl sulfide (5.6%), and dimethyl trisulfide (1.6%) |
|
| ||
| Laurel |
| 1,8-Cineole (26.7%), eugenol (18.5%), linalool (18.5%), sabinene (11.8%), methyl eugenol (6.5%), |
|
| ||
| Orange sweet |
| D-limonene (82.7%), |
|
| ||
| Oregano |
| Thymol (38.0%), cis- |
Median values of the antibacterial activity of seven essential oils dissolved in ethanol at 70% (v/v) at two concentrations against six bacterial strains isolated from documents biofilms and indoor environments of archival repositories.
| Details of plant oils | Diameter of inhibition zone (mm) at | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Plant species |
Common name |
Conc. (%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Anise | 50 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 4 | 5 |
| 25 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 7 | 6 | 7 | ||
|
| Clove | 50 | 7 | 10 | 14 | 18 | 6 | 11 |
| 25 | 7 | 10 | 18 | 24 | 6 | 12 | ||
|
| Cumin | 50 | 4 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 8 |
| 25 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 4 | ||
|
| Garlic | 50 | 15 | 14 | 8 | 8 | 30 | 30 |
| 25 | 10 | 11 | 8 | 7 | 30 | 30 | ||
|
| Laurel | 50 | 10 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 |
| 25 | 7 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | ||
|
| Orange sweet | 50 | 7 | 6 | 8 | 8 | 1 | 12 |
| 25 | 10 | 5 | 7 | 8 | 1 | 12 | ||
|
| Oregano | 50 | 12 | 11 | 25 | 21 | 11 | 14 |
| 25 | 10 | 10 | 30 | 30 | 8 | 11 | ||
| Controls | Ethanol | 70 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gentamycin sulphate | 40 mg/mL | 17 | 20 | 18 | 21 | 26 | 32 | |
*Streptomyces sp. was incubated at 72 h.
aData are mean of three replications.
Median values of the antifungal activity of seven essential oils dissolved in ethanol at 70% (v/v) against four fungal strains isolated from documents biofilms and indoor environments of archival repositories.
| Essential oils | Diameter of inhibition zone (mm) at 5 daysa | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Common name) | Conc. (%) |
|
|
|
|
| Anise | 100 | 40 | 40 | 40 | 40 |
| 50.0 | 40 | 40 | 40 | 40 | |
| 25.0 | 40 | 40 | 40 | 40 | |
| 12.5 | 40 | 40 | 40 | 40 | |
| 7.5 | 40 | 40 | 40 | 40 | |
|
| |||||
| Clove | 100 | 20* | 15* | 20* | 30* |
| 50.0 | 15* | 13* | 15* | 20* | |
| 25.0 | 13* | 12* | 13* | 18* | |
| 12.5 | 11* | 7* | 6* | 15* | |
| 7.5 | 8* | 6* | 5* | 14* | |
|
| |||||
| Cumin | 100 | 18 | 25 | 15 | 15 |
| 50.0 | 15 | 20 | 13 | 12 | |
| 25.0 | 12 | 13 | 12 | 11 | |
| 12.5 | 11 | 7 | 0 | 0 | |
| 7.5 | 10 | 5 | 0 | 0 | |
|
| |||||
| Garlic | 100 | 40 | 40 | 40 | 40 |
| 50.0 | 40 | 40 | 40 | 40 | |
| 25.0 | 40 | 40 | 40 | 40 | |
| 12.5 | 40 | 40 | 40 | 40 | |
| 7.5 | 40 | 40 | 40 | 40 | |
|
| |||||
| Laurel | 100 | 5* | 8* | 7 | 6 |
| 50.0 | 0** | 0** | 0 | 0 | |
| 25.0 | 0** | 0** | 0 | 0 | |
| 12.5 | 0** | 0** | 0 | 0 | |
| 7.5 | 0** | 0** | 0 | 0 | |
|
| |||||
| Orange sweet | 100 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| 50.0 | 3 | 0 | 5 | 5 | |
| 25.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 12.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 7.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
|
| |||||
| Oregano | 100 | 30* | 30* | 30* | 30* |
| 50.0 | 20* | 25* | 20* | 25* | |
| 25.0 | 15* | 15* | 15* | 15* | |
| 12.5 | 15* | 15* | 15* | 15* | |
| 7.5 | 5* | 10* | 15* | 15* | |
|
| |||||
| Ethanol | 70 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
| |||||
| Miconazole | 10 mg/mL | 6 | 6 | 10 | 11 |
*It indicates that the oil analyzed also stop due to the fungal sporulation in the next area due to the lack of growth. **It indicates that the oil analyzed only inhibited sporulation of the fungi. aData are mean of three replications.
Figure 1Inhibition halo of growth of A. niger (a) and Penicillium sp. (b) against oregano oil at five concentrations studied (100, 50, 25, 12.5, and 7.5%). Also, it can be observed that the inhibition of the fungal sporulation in the next area is due to the lack of growth.