| Literature DB >> 23762321 |
Paraskevi Georgakopoulos1, Robin A Lockington, Joan M Kelly.
Abstract
A mutation screen in Aspergillus nidulans uncovered mutations in the acdX gene that led to altered repression by acetate, but not by glucose. AcdX of A. nidulans is highly conserved with Spt8p of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, and since Spt8p is a component of the Spt-Ada-Gcn5 Acetyltransferase (SAGA) complex, the SAGA complex may have a role in acetate repression in A. nidulans. We used a bioinformatic approach to identify genes encoding most members of the SAGA complex in A. nidulans, and a proteomic analysis to confirm that most protein components identified indeed exist as a complex in A. nidulans. No apparent compositional differences were detected in mycelia cultured in acetate compared to glucose medium. The methods used revealed apparent differences between Yeast and A. nidulans in the deubiquitination (DUB) module of the complex, which in S. cerevisiae consists of Sgf11p, Sus1p, and Ubp8p. Although a convincing homologue of S. cerevisiae Ubp8p was identified in the A. nidulans genome, there were no apparent homologues for Sus1p and Sgf11p. In addition, when the SAGA complex was purified from A. nidulans, members of the DUB module were not co-purified with the complex, indicating that functional homologues of Sus1p and Sgf11p were not part of the complex. Thus, deubiquitination of H2B-Ub in stress conditions is likely to be regulated differently in A. nidulans compared to S. cerevisiae.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23762321 PMCID: PMC3676421 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0065221
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Genotypes of strains used in this study.
| Pseudonym | Genotype | Derivation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| This work |
Oligonucleotide primers used in this study.
| Primer name | Primer sequence 5′–3′ |
| SptCfApaI |
|
| SptCrNcoI |
|
| N-TAPfNcoI |
|
| N-TAPrApaI |
|
The SAGA complex components present in the A. nidulans genome.
| Functional module |
|
| Similarity/Identity | E-value |
| Structural integrity | Spt20p | AN0976 (RfeE) | 22.1/13.4 | 1.0E |
| “ | Spt7p | AN4894 | 39.7/25.0 | 1.0E |
| “ | Ada1p | AN10953 | 35.1/22/7 | 2.0E |
| Hat activity | Gcn5p | AN3621 (GcnE) | 69.5/53.0 | 2.0E |
| “ | Ada2p | AN10763 (AdaB) | 57.7/41.7 | 1.0E |
| “ | Ada3p | AN0440 | 39.1/24.2 | 1.0E |
| TBP binding | Spt8p | AN4670 (AcdX) | 44.9/29.2 | 4.0E |
| “ | Spt3p | AN0719 (SptC) | 65.4/47.1 | 2.0E |
| TAFIIs | Taf5p | AN0292 | 42.0/28.2 | 8.0E |
| “ | Taf6p | AN8232 | 57.2/37.6 | 1.0E |
| “ | Taf9p | AN0794 | 35.1/24.3 | 3.0E |
| “ | Taf10p | AN0154 | 36.9/27.2 | 4.0E |
| “ | Taf12p | AN2769 | 37.3/24.1 | 1.0E |
| Deubiquitination | Sgf73p | AN11747 | 24.4/16.1 | 1.0E |
| “ | Ubp8p | AN3711 | 44.9/30.7 | 1.0E |
| “ | Sus1p | AN7253 | 21.3/10.4 | 3.8E |
| “ | Sgf11p | AN8685 | 13.8/08.3 | 9.2E |
| Interact H3K4m | Chd1p | AN1255 | 51.3/37.6 | 0.00 |
| “ | Sgf29p | AN0668 | 27.4/19.3 | 1.0E |
| Interact activators | Tra1p | AN8000 | 22.1/13.4 | 0.00 |
Functions of the S. cerevisiae SAGA complex subunits.
S. cerevisiae homologues identified in A. nidulans.
A. nidulans accession number.
References: RfeE [38], AdaB and GcnE [16], AcdX and SptC [21].
Figure 1Complementation of the sptCΔ MYC acdXnkuAΔ by pN−TAPSPTC.
sptCΔ MYC acdXnkuAΔ protoplasts plated on osmotically stabilised minimum medium, after 3 days growth at 37°C. A) No DNA control. B) Transformed with pNSPTC; arrow indicates complemented transformant.
Figure 2SAGA complex purification.
a) Tandem affinity purification of a strain containing SptC tagged with the TAP tag (Lane 1) and a strain with wildtype SptC (Lane 2). The gel regions that were purified are numbered, and the S. cerevisiae homologues of the SAGA complex components identified in A. nidulans by LC MS are shown on the right. b) Tandem affinity purification of the N-TAPsptC;MYCacdX;nkuAΔ strain grown in media containing either 1% glucose (Lane 1), 50 mM arabinose (Lane 2) or 50 mM sodium acetate pH 6.0 (Lane 3). LC-MS was performed for all three conditions in this experiment. c) Figure 2c shows one of a further two repeat experiments, designed specifically to determine whether the differences in staining intensity around 50KDa in lane 3 of Figure 2b were robustly repeatable, showing that the apparent differences in part b are an artifact.