Literature DB >> 23762318

Pre-miR-27a rs895819A/G polymorphisms in cancer: a meta-analysis.

Qian Xu1, Cai-Yun He, Jing-Wei Liu, Yuan Yuan.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: MicroRNAs (miRNAs) negatively regulate the 3' untranslated region (3'-UTR) of coding genes by suppressing translation or degrading mRNAs, and they act as oncogenes or tumor suppressors. Recently, several studies investigated the association between pre-miR-27a rs895819 polymorphism and the risks of various cancers, but the results were inconsistent. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL
FINDINGS: We conducted a meta-analysis of 13 studies that included 6501 cancer cases and 7571 controls to address this association. Overall, this meta-analysis showed that the pre-miR-27a rs895819 A/G polymorphism was not statistically associated with cancers risk in all genetic models. In the stratified analysis by cancer types, when compared with the ancestral A allele, individuals with the variant G allele was consistently associated with reduced risks of breast cancer (OR = 0.92, 95% CI = 0.85-0.99), renal cell cancer (OR = 0.81, 95% CI = 0.67-0.97) and nasopharyngeal cancer (OR = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.72-0.97). Inversely, individuals with the heterozygote AG was associated with an increased risk of digestive tract cancers compared with AA genotype (AG vs. AA: OR = 1.16, 95% CI = 1.01-1.32). In the stratified analysis by ethnicity, the pre-miR-27a rs895819 polymorphism showed statistically significant association with decreased risks of cancers in Caucasians (G vs. A allele: OR = 0.90, 95% CI = 0.83-0.97; AG vs. AA: OR = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.75-0.94; AG/GG vs. AA: OR = 0.85, 95% CI = 0.76-0.94) but not in Asians. CONCLUSION/SIGNIFICANCE: This meta-analysis suggests that the pre-miR-27a rs895819 polymorphism may contribute to the susceptibilities of some specific-type of cancers, including breast cancer, renal cell cancer, nasopharyngeal cancer and digestive tract cancers, as well as the susceptibilities of cancers in Caucasians to some extent.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23762318      PMCID: PMC3676439          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0065208

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


Introduction

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are RNAs that are 18–23 nucleotides long that participate in the transcriptional regulation of eukaryotic genes [1], which is associated with post-transcriptional modifications that lead to the mRNA’s degradation or the translational repression of the targeted genes [2]. miRNA genes are transcribed to a hairpin-shaped RNA form named pri-miRNA [3], which is processed by an endonuclease, Drosha, to form a pre-miRNA that is 60–70 nucleotides long [4]. The pre-miRNAs are cleaved by an endonuclease, Dicer, to form the mature miRNA, which functions as a gene regulator [5]. The variation of the pri-, pre-, and mature miRNA through physiological processes may cause the incidence and development of a tumor. miRNAs are transcribed from a gene intron and/or intergenic region. Polymorphisms exist in the pri-, pre-, and mature miRNA genes that can potentially influence the processing of maturing miRNAs, broadly affecting the miRNA function [6]. The first research focused on pre-miRNA polymorphisms screened 323 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in 227 miRNA genes according to bioinformation by Duan et al. [6]. From then on, scholars all focused on 3 SNP sites in the field of the association between miRNA polymorphism and cancers, hsa-pre-miR-146a rs2910164, hsa-pre-miR-196a2 rs11614913, and hsa-miR-499 rs374644, and several meta analyses reported that these 3 sites were associated with cancer risks [7]–[16]. The miR-27a rs895819 A/G polymorphism is located in the loop of the pre-miRNA, and the variation from A to G could cause a change in the minimum free energy (MFE). Therefore, this SNP may affect the function of the miRNA to some extent. However, the results regarding its association with cancer risk are conflicting. The majority of studies reported that the variant allele could decrease the cancer risk [17]–[19], but some studies reported different viewpoints. A few studies reported that the association between the variant G allele and cancer risk was insignificant; these studies denied the protective role of the G allele [20]–[22]. Moreover, some studies reported that the variant G allele was a risk allele. For example, 2 studies using samples from the same continent analyzed the AG and GG genotypes for the risk of gastric cancer and compared the risk with that for the AA wild-type genotype. One study found that the AG and GG genotypes increased the risk of gastric cancer [23], and the other study found the opposite result [24]. Therefore, the comprehensive analysis that integrates all individual studies is still required. To enhance the efficiency of meta-analysis on the risk of cancers and investigate whether this rs895819 polymorphism was associated with the gastric cancer risk, an unpublished case-control study on gastric cancer that was performed by Qian Xu et al at the Tumor Etiology and Screening Department of Cancer Institute and General Surgery in the First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China was collected. Overall, 13 datasets consisted of 6501 cases with cancers and 7571 controls were included in our study. These data should be combined to expand our understanding of the pre-miR-27a rs895819 SNP, which may provide some evidence for the future research. Thus, in this study we conducted a meta-analysis to combine all of the available studies and validate whether the miR-27a A/G polymorphism contributes to the risks of cancers.

Methods

Publication Search

A systematic literature search was performed for all articles on the association between pre-miR-27a rs895819 polymorphism and cancer risks up to March 15th, 2013. The PubMed databases, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) and Web of Science were used simultaneously. The following key words were used: “miR-27a”, “cancer/carcinoma/tumor/neoplasm”, “rs895819” and “polymorphism” by two independent investigators Qian Xu and Cai-yun He. All the studies met the following criteria: (1) case-control study; (2) the association between miR-27a polymorphism and cancer risks was explored; and (3) genotype frequency was available. The major exclusion criteria were: (1) duplicate data, (2) the study only for cancer samples or for precancerous disease compared with controls, and (3) the subjects in control group were high-risk individuals with some gene mutations.

Data Extraction

Two of the authors (Qian Xu and Cai-yun He) extracted all data independently, complied with the selection criteria, and reached a consensus on all items. The following items were collected: first author’s name, year of publication, country of origin, ethnicity, cancer type, language, genotyping method, source of control groups (population- or hospital-based), and total number of cases and controls, and genotype distributions in cases and controls. Meanwhile, we categorized gastric cancer, colorectal cancer and liver cancer into ‘digestive tract cancer’ for the stratified analysis.

Statistics

Firstly, the genotype frequencies of miR-27a polymorphism for Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) were assessed by the Chi-square test in controls and a P<0.05 was considered as significant disequilibrium. The strength of the association between the miR-27a polymorphism and cancer risks was estimated by odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Statistical heterogeneity among studies was tested by Chi square-based Q test and I2 [25]. Heterogeneity was considered significantly when P<0.10 was observed in Q test, and I2 was used to qualify variation in OR attributable to heterogeneity. When heterogeneity exists, a random-effect model based on DerSimonian and Laird method was used to calculated the pooled OR of each study [26]; otherwise, a fixed-effect model based on the Mantel-Haenszel method was employed [27]. Generally, we first evaluated the risks between G allele and cancer risks compared with that for A allele in the codominant model (AG versus AA, GG versus AA), dominant model (AG/GG versus AA) and recessive model (GG versus AG/AA), and allelic comparison (G versus A). We also performed stratification analyses on cancer type (divided into digestive tract cancer, breast cancer, nasopharyngeal cancer and renal cell cancer) and ethnicity (Asian and Caucasian). Meta-regression was further performed to detect the source of heterogeneity. The between-studies variance (τ2) was used to quantify the degree of heterogeneity between studies and the percentage of τ2 was used to describe the extent of heterogeneity explained [28]. The Begg’s rank correlation method was used to statistically assess publication bias [29] (P<0.10 was considered as statistically significant). All analyses were done using STATA software, version 11.0 (STATA Corp., College Station, TX, USA), and all tests were two-sided.

Results

Characteristics of the Studies

A total of 20 articles were found by literature search from the PubMed, CNKI and Web of Science [17]–[24], [30]–[41], using different combinations of key terms. As shown in Figure 1, we excluded nine studies (one was function study [34], one was reduplicate data and showed technique problem [33], two were not studied for the rs895819 polymorphism [31], [35], one is case-only study [32], two had no qualified cases or controls [17], [36], and two were meta-analyses about the rs895819 SNP [30], [41]). In addition, our research group provided this meta-analysis with a set of unpublished data regarding the association between rs895819 polymorphism and gastric cancer risk. Accordingly, a total of 13 case-control studies extracted from 11 articles and a set of our unpublished data that met our inclusion criteria were included in the final meta-analysis [18]–[24], [37]–[40], which consisted of 6501 cancer cases and 7571 cancer-free controls. The characteristic of each included study was presented in Table 1. Of the enrolled 13 studies, all were matched for age, sex except 4 studies for breast cancer that did not need to match sex; 10 studies investigated in Asians and the other 3 studies investigated in Caucasians; controls in 7 studies were hospital-based and controls of the other studies were population-based or mixed subjects; genotyping methods included PCR-RFLP (3 studies), TaqMan (3 studies), PCR-based single base extension (5 studies) and PCR-direct sequencing (2 studies). 11 out of 13 studies checked genotypes for quality control. Genotype distribution of controls in all studies was consistent with Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium.
Figure 1

Studies identified in this meta-analysis based on the criteria for inclusion and exclusion.

Table 1

Characteristics of literatures included in this meta-analysis for miR-27a rs895819A/G polymorphism.

First authorYearCountryEthnicityCancer typeLanguageGenotyping methodSource of control groupsSample sizeCaseControl P of HWE
CaseControlAAAGGGAAAGGG
Qian Xu2013* ChinaAsianGastric cancerChinese* SequencingPB and HB mixed2223051151007173110220.437
Danni Shi2012ChinaAsianRenal Cell CancerEnglishTaqManHB59460033421347288262500.373
Renata Hezova2012CzechCaucasianColorectal cancerEnglishTaqManHB1972128886239394250.867
Irene Catucci2012ItalyCaucasianBreast cancerEnglishTaqManPB10251593547388908036331570.051
Yuan Zhou2012ChinaAsianGastric cancerEnglishMassARRAYHB2954131661227214167320.941
Mingwu Zhang2012ChinaAsianBreast cancerEnglishPCR-RFLPPB245243601444175109590.123
Mingwu Zhang2012ChinaAsianColorectal cancerChinesePCR-RFLPPB46346824817837270166320.351
Peirao Li2011ChinaAsianLiver cancerChineseSNPstreamHB40145919017833233190360.751
Peirao Li2011ChinaAsianNasopharyngeal cancerChineseSNPstreamHB801102244330058505431860.658
Ping Zhang2011ChinaAsianBreast cancerChineseMassARRAYNot mentioned3761901961503010670140.605
Wenzhang Wang2011ChinaAsianLiver cancerChineseMassARRAYHB361340186175 162178 0.407
Qingmin Sun2010ChinaAsianGastric cancerEnglishPCR-RFLPHB30430411513554145119400.053
Rongxi Yang2010GermanyCaucasianBreast cancerEnglishSequencingPB121714225764861276056601510.142

HB, hospital based; PB, population based; HWE, Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium; PCR-RFLP, polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism.

the study year when this unpublished data was finished in a Chinese population.

only the data of dominant model could get, so this study was only analyzed when the dominant model was used.

HB, hospital based; PB, population based; HWE, Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium; PCR-RFLP, polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism. the study year when this unpublished data was finished in a Chinese population. only the data of dominant model could get, so this study was only analyzed when the dominant model was used.

Quantitative Synthesis

First, all the eligible studies were pooled to estimate the association strength of mir-27a rs895819 polymorphism with the overall risk of all types of cancers. No statistically significant association was found in all genetic models (Table 2). We further performed stratification analysis based on different cancer types and different ethnicities (Table 2).
Table 2

Pooled ORs and 95% CIs of the overall and stratified meta-analyses.

VariablesNAG vs. AAGG vs. AAAG/GG vs. AAGG vs. AA/AGG vs. A
OR(95% CI) P a I2(%)OR(95% CI) P a I2(%)Nd OR(95% CI) P a I2(%)OR(95% CI) P a I2(%)OR(95% CI) P a I2(%)
All cancers121.010.89470.0 c 0.900.08046.1b 130.980.68565.2 c 0.910.12343.8b 0.960.40358.8 c
(0.88–1.16)(0.79–1.01)(0.86–1.10)(0.81–1.03)(0.88–1.05)
Cancer type
Digestive tractcancer6 1.16 0.031 0.0 b 0.900.66770.7 c 71.080.18143.0 b 0.860.47167.6 c 1.060.40358.4 c
(1.01–1.32) (0.57–1.43)(0.96–1.21)(0.56–1.31)(0.91–1.23)
Breast cancer41.010.94577.1 c 0.880.1540.0 b 40.960.70666.2 c 0.900.21016.4 b 0.92 0.023 0.0 b
(0.78–1.30)(0.74–1.05)(0.79–1.18)(0.76–1.06) (0.85–0.99)
Renal Cell Cancer1 0.70 0.004 /0.810.336/1 0.72 0.004 /0.950.790/ 0.81 0.019 /
(0.55–0.89) (0.53–1.24) (0.57–0.90) (0.62–1.43) (0.67–0.97)
Nasopharyngealcancer1 0.79 0.020 /0.770.148/1 0.79 0.012 /0.850.357/ 0.84 0.018 /
(0.65–0.96) (0.54–1.01) (0.66–0.95) (0.60–1.20) (0.72–0.97)
Ethnicity
Asian91.080.41072.6 c 0.900.48060.0 c 101.030.76169.3 c 0.860.26157.6 c 0.990.89567.2 c
(0.90–1.31)(0.68–1.20)(0.87–1.21)(0.66–1.12)(0.87–1.13)
Caucasian3 0.84 0.003 3.7 b 0.870.1430.0 b 3 0.85 0.002 0.0 b 0.950.5490.0 b 0.90 0.009 0.0 b
(0.75–0.94) (0.73–1.05) (0.76–0.94) (0.80–1.13) (0.83–0.97)

OR: odds ratio; CI: confidence interval. The results were in bold, if the 95% CI excluded 1 or P<0.05.

the statistical significance of the pooled OR was determined by the Z test;

No statistical significance was found by the heterogeneity test, then the fixed-effects model was adopted here.

confirmatory analyses with a random-effect model was used if there was significant heterogeneity.

when the dominant model was analyzed, the data studied by Wenzhang Wang (2011) was added.

OR: odds ratio; CI: confidence interval. The results were in bold, if the 95% CI excluded 1 or P<0.05. the statistical significance of the pooled OR was determined by the Z test; No statistical significance was found by the heterogeneity test, then the fixed-effects model was adopted here. confirmatory analyses with a random-effect model was used if there was significant heterogeneity. when the dominant model was analyzed, the data studied by Wenzhang Wang (2011) was added. In the stratification analysis of cancer type, the variant G allele was observed to be statistically associated with a decreased risk of breast cancer (OR = 0.92, 95% CI = 0.85–0.99). Since only one study was conducted in renal cell cancer or nasopharyngeal cancer [19] [38], the pooled OR could not be appraised on these two cancer types. Based on single study, we observed that the AG heterozygote and AG/GG genotypes were consistently associated with decreased risks of renal cell cancer (AG vs. AA:OR = 0.70, 95% CI = 0.55–0.89; AG/GG vs. AA: OR = 0.72, 95% CI = 0.57–0.90) and nasopharyngeal cancer (AG vs. AA:OR = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.65–0.96; AG/GG vs. AA: OR = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.66–0.95) when compared with the wild-type AA genotype. In addition, the G allele was statistically associated with decreased risks of renal cell cancer (OR = 0.81, 95% CI = 0.67–0.97) and nasopharyngeal cancer (OR = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.72–0.97) compared with the A allele. These observations insinuated a reverse association of G allele with the risks of those tumor types. Nevertheless, the comparison of AG versus AA in digestive tract cancer subgroup showed an opposite result. The AG genotype was associated with an increased risk of digestive tract cancer (AG vs. AA genotype: OR = 1.16, 95% CI = 1.01–1.32). In the stratification analysis of ethnicity, when compared with the ancestral AA genotype, the AG heterozygote and AG/GG genotypes were associated with a decreased risk of cancers in Caucasians subgroup (AG vs. AA: OR = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.75–0.94; AG/GG vs. AA: OR = 0.85, 95% CI = 0.76–0.94) but not in Asians subgroup. We observed the same association in the allelic comparison (G allele vs. A allele: OR = 0.90, 95% CI = 0.83–0.97).

Heterogeneity

The heterogeneity within each subgroup was shown in Table 2. A part of comparisons showed slight or moderate heterogeneities between studies. We subsequently conducted sensitivity analyses to explore individual study’s influence on the pooled results by the removing one study at a time from pooled analysis (Table S1). The results showed no individual study affected the pooled OR significantly. We therefore further explored the source of heterogeneity by cancer type, ethnicity, language, and genotyping method with meta-regression in allelic comparison (G vs A). Meta-regression results revealed that cancer type (P = 0.023) but not ethnicity (P = 0.452), language (P = 0.347), or genotyping method (P = 0.100) contributed to the source of heterogeneity. Additionally, cancer type could explained 85.29% of the between studies variance (τ2).

Publication Bias

Begg’s rank correlation was conducted to evaluate publication bias. In the comparison of AG vs. AA and dominant model (AG/GG versus AA), a slight publication bias was observed (AG vs. AA: P = 0.020; AG/GG versus AA: P = 0.088, respectively, Table 3), insinuating potential publication bias due to a language bias, inflated estimates by a flawed methodological design in smaller studies, and/or a lack of publication of small trials with opposite results.
Table 3

The results of Begg’ s test for the publication bias.

Comparison type for miR-27a rs895819Begg’ s test
Z value P value
AG vs. AA2.330.020
GG vs. AA−0.410.681
AG/GG vs. AA1.710.088
GG vs. AA/AG−1.100.273
G vs. A0.690.493

Discussion

miR-27a, which is located in an intergenic region of chromosome 19 (chr19∶13947254–13947331), had up-regulated expression in many tumors [42] and was considered to be an oncomir [43]–[45]. Using the single-stranded conformational polymorphism-polymerase chain reaction (PCR-SSCP) method Tomiyasu Arisawa discovered in 2007 that there was a polymorphism in the flanking region of miR-27a gene, and the variant G allele frequency reached 34.6% [36]. In the same year, Ranhui Duan et al. employed a bioinformatic method to screen 323 SNPs, and emphasized the importance of this rs895819 SNP because of its location in the pre-miRNA sequence [6]. Since then, several studies of this SNP emerged in succession. In 2010, Tair Kontorovich et al., using a Sequenom MassARRAY, screened 42 miRNA-related SNPs and found that AG heterozygote of miR-27a rs895819 had a lower risk for breast/ovarian cancer among Jewish women [17]. At almost the same time, Rongxi Yang et al. used a sequencing method to observe that the variant G allele significantly decreased familial breast cancer risk in a German population [18]. Following that, it was suggested that the AG and GG genotypes had a decreased renal cell cancer risk in a Chinese population compared with the AA wild-type genotype [19]. However, some studies hold different viewpoints; a few studies considered the relationship between the variant G allele and the risk of tumor to be insignificant [20]–[22]. Moreover, some researchers thought that the variant G allele was a risk allele. Two inconsistent studies investigated the risk of gastric cancer using samples from the same country. Qingmin Sun et al. found that the AG and GG genotypes were associated with an increased risk of gastric cancer and an increased expression level of miR-27a [23], but Yuan Zhou observed the opposite result [24]. According to our meta-analysis, A→G variation at miR-27a rs895819 polymorphism site did not exert significant genetic effect on cancer risk in the overall analysis (Table 2). We further performed stratification analysis based on cancer type and ethnicity. In breast cancer subgroup analysis integrating 4 studies, subjects carrying G allele of rs895819 demonstrated reduced cancer risk. Additionally, one study about renal cell cancer [19] and one study on nasopharyngeal cancer [38] could not be incorporated into other cancer types and thus were analyzed separately as single cancer type in this meta-analysis. For renal cell cancer and nasopharyngeal cancer, association analyses under codominant model (AG versus AA), dominant model (AG/GG versus AA) and allelic comparison (G vs. A) consistently supported that this polymorphism was related to decreased risks of both cancers. The slight difference of ORs and 95% CI between our meta-analysis and their original studies was probably due to unavailable raw data for adjustment of other factors. All these findings indicated that this polymorphism may be associated with decreased risks of specific cancers including breast cancer, renal cell carcinoma and nasopharyngeal carcinoma. In subgroup analysis of digestive tract cancer, however, we observed that AG genotype was associated with increased cancer risk. As for the single original study, Sun et al ’s [23] reported a statistically positive association of rs895819 polymorphism with gastric cancer risk; four studies [23], [37], [38] (Qian Xu, 2013*) showed that this polymorphism tended to be positively associated with higher risks of digestive tract cancers, although they did not reach statistical significance. In this meta-analysis, we incorporated and evaluated the available data of this polymorphism with digestive tract cancer risk, which may demonstrate a relatively stable result. The difference of the association of this polymorphism with various cancers may result from distinct cell origin and pathogenetic mechanisms of different cancers. To better elucidate the association of this polymorphism with digestive tract cancer, we added a set of unpublished data which was a case-control study including 222 gastric cancer cases and 305 superficial gastritis patients as controls in Chinese. The control group contained participants from a health check program for gastric cancer screening in Zhuanghe region of Liaoning Province, China and patients who underwent gastroscopic examination in the First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning Province, China. All the 527 subjects were diagnosed independently by two professorial pathologists. By integrating currently-published 6 studies and our newly-unpublished data, we found for the first time that this polymorphism may be associated with digestive tract cancer, which is also one of the differences between our meta-analysis and previously published meta-analyses. Furthermore, considering the relatively obvious heterogeneity observed in this meta-analysis even after employing sensitivity analyses and subgroup analyses, we carried out meta-regression to further explore the source of heterogeneity. Interestingly, the results of meta-regression indicated the heterogeneity mainly resulted from different cancer types and this variance could explain the majority of heterogeneity origin. Therefore, the different effects of this polymorphism on various cancers should not be overlooked and its specific effects on different cancer types are warranted to be clarified in future research. Limitations of this study should also be noted. First, we pooled the data using unadjusted information, whereas a more precise analysis could to be conducted if detailed information of original data is available. Second, a lack of original data of the reviewed studies limited our further evaluation of potential interactions, including the interactions between different genes and between gene and environment factors. Third, only English and Chinese documents and our unpublished study were included in this meta-analysis, while reports that were written in other languages and other unpublished data or ongoing studies were not available, which may cause certain publication bias in our meta-analysis. The last but not the least, the pooled sample size was relatively limited in this meta-analysis. Therefore, this meta-analysis could only preliminarily appraise the association of rs895819 polymorphism with currently-reported cancers. More studies are still required to get a more reliable result. In summary, this meta-analysis indicated that the G allele of miR-27a rs895819 polymorphism may be associated with decreased risks of breast cancer, renal cell cancer and nasopharyngeal cancer, as well as a decreased cancer risk in Caucasians and AG heterozygote might be associated with an increased risk of digestive tract cancer. To confirm our findings, additional well-designed studies in diverse ethnic populations and functional studies regarding this SNP are required. ORs (95% CI) of sensitivity analysis. (DOC) Click here for additional data file. Checklist of this meta-analysis. (DOC) Click here for additional data file.
  41 in total

1.  Associations of miRNA polymorphisms and female physiological characteristics with breast cancer risk in Chinese population.

Authors:  M Zhang; M Jin; Y Yu; S Zhang; Y Wu; H Liu; H Liu; B Chen; Q Li; X Ma; K Chen
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Care (Engl)       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 2.520

2.  A bias in genotyping the miR-27a rs895819 and rs11671784 variants.

Authors:  Rongxi Yang; Barbara Burwinkel
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2012-07-03       Impact factor: 4.872

3.  Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) expression is negatively regulated by certain microRNAs in human lung tissues.

Authors:  Takeshi Hirota; Yuko Date; Yu Nishibatake; Hiroshi Takane; Yasushi Fukuoka; Yuuji Taniguchi; Naoto Burioka; Eiji Shimizu; Hiroshige Nakamura; Kenji Otsubo; Ichiro Ieiri
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  2012-02-03       Impact factor: 5.705

4.  Evaluation of SNPs in miR-196-a2, miR-27a and miR-146a as risk factors of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Renata Hezova; Alena Kovarikova; Julie Bienertova-Vasku; Milana Sachlova; Martina Redova; Anna Vasku; Marek Svoboda; Lenka Radova; Igor Kiss; Rostislav Vyzula; Ondrej Slaby
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-06-14       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Association analysis of genetic variants in microRNA networks and gastric cancer risk in a Chinese Han population.

Authors:  Yuan Zhou; Wei-Dong Du; Gang Chen; Jian Ruan; Song Xu; Fu-Sheng Zhou; Xian-Bo Zuo; Zhao-Jie Lv; Xue-Jun Zhang
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-02-17       Impact factor: 4.553

6.  The association between hsa-miR-499 T>C polymorphism and cancer risk: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lina Wang; Shasha Qian; Hong Zhi; Yu Zhang; Bei Wang; Zuhong Lu
Journal:  Gene       Date:  2012-08-10       Impact factor: 3.688

7.  Hsa-miR-196a2 Rs11614913 polymorphism contributes to cancer susceptibility: evidence from 15 case-control studies.

Authors:  Haiyan Chu; Meilin Wang; Danni Shi; Lan Ma; Zhizhong Zhang; Na Tong; Xinying Huo; Wei Wang; Dewei Luo; Yan Gao; Zhengdong Zhang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-03-31       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Effects of common polymorphisms rs11614913 in miR-196a2 and rs2910164 in miR-146a on cancer susceptibility: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Wei Xu; Jijun Xu; Shifeng Liu; Bo Chen; Xueli Wang; Yan Li; Yun Qian; Weihong Zhao; Jianqing Wu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-05-26       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  A genetic variant in miR-196a2 increased digestive system cancer risks: a meta-analysis of 15 case-control studies.

Authors:  Jing Guo; Mingjuan Jin; Mingwu Zhang; Kun Chen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  A polymorphism of microRNA 27a genome region is associated with the development of gastric mucosal atrophy in Japanese male subjects.

Authors:  Tomiyasu Arisawa; Tomomitsu Tahara; Tomoyuki Shibata; Mitsuo Nagasaka; Masakatsu Nakamura; Yoshio Kamiya; Hiroshi Fujita; Shin Hasegawa; Tamaki Takagi; Fang-Yu Wang; Ichiro Hirata; Hiroshi Nakano
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2007-03-16       Impact factor: 3.487

View more
  17 in total

Review 1.  Regulation of the mRNA half-life in breast cancer.

Authors:  Paola Griseri; Gilles Pagès
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-08-10

2.  Genetic polymorphism in HLA-G 3'UTR 14-bp ins/del and risk of cancer: a meta-analysis of case-control study.

Authors:  Tao Li; Haohai Huang; Dan Liao; Huahuang Ling; Bingguang Su; Maode Cai
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomics       Date:  2015-01-09       Impact factor: 3.291

3.  Evaluation of miR-27a, miR-181a, and miR-570 genetic variants with gallbladder cancer susceptibility and treatment outcome in a North Indian population.

Authors:  Annapurna Gupta; Aarti Sharma; Anu Yadav; Neeraj Rastogi; Sushma Agrawal; Ashok Kumar; Vijay Kumar; Sanjeev Misra; Balraj Mittal
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 4.074

4.  In silico analysis of polymorphisms in microRNAs that target genes affecting aerobic glycolysis.

Authors:  Padmanaban S Suresh; Thejaswini Venkatesh; Rie Tsutsumi
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2016-02

5.  A new polymorphism biomarker rs629367 associated with increased risk and poor survival of gastric cancer in chinese by up-regulated miRNA-let-7a expression.

Authors:  Qian Xu; Qiguan Dong; Caiyun He; Wenjing Liu; Liping Sun; Jingwei Liu; Chengzhong Xing; Xiaohang Li; Bengang Wang; Yuan Yuan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-23       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  MicroRNA-27a directly targets KRAS to inhibit cell proliferation in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Yuzhi Jiang; Yuting Duan; Haibin Zhou
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2014-11-11       Impact factor: 2.967

7.  Pri-miR-34b/c rs4938723 TC heterozygote is associated with increased cancer risks: evidence from published data.

Authors:  De-Hui Yi; Ben-Gang Wang; Xin-Ping Zhong; Hao Liu; Yong-Feng Liu
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2014-09-09

8.  Associations between the Genetic Polymorphisms of Osteopontin Promoter and Susceptibility to Cancer in Chinese Population: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Yulan Liu; Hongbo Lei; Jixiang Zhang; Jun Wang; Kui Li; Weiguo Dong
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Gene polymorphisms of micrornas in Helicobacter pylori-induced high risk atrophic gastritis and gastric cancer.

Authors:  Juozas Kupcinskas; Thomas Wex; Alexander Link; Marcis Leja; Indre Bruzaite; Ruta Steponaitiene; Simonas Juzenas; Ugne Gyvyte; Audrius Ivanauskas; Guntis Ancans; Vitalija Petrenkiene; Jurgita Skieceviciene; Limas Kupcinskas; Peter Malfertheiner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-27       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Association between microRNA polymorphisms and cancer risk based on the findings of 66 case-control studies.

Authors:  Xiao Pin Ma; Ting Zhang; Bo Peng; Long Yu; De Ke Jiang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.