| Literature DB >> 23762166 |
Kyung-Min Shin1, Ji-Eun Park, Sanghun Lee, Sun-Mi Choi, Yo-Chan Ahn, Jin-Woo Lee, Jin-Hee Kim, Chang-Gue Son.
Abstract
Siguan acupoints have been used to treat gastrointestinal symptoms in acupuncture practices for a long time. This study aimed to investigate the effects of Siguan acupuncture on gastrointestinal motility under accelerated conditions using a randomized, sham-acupuncture-controlled, crossover study. Twenty-one healthy male subjects were hospitalized and randomized into either a real acupuncture group (at Siguan acupoints) or a sham acupuncture group. Subjects were administered with mosapride citrate (15 mg a day) for 2 days starting 24 hours before the first acupuncture treatment. Immediately after the administration of radio markers, acupuncture treatment was conducted 4 times at 12-hour intervals. Gastrointestinal motility was assessed using radiograph distribution of the radio-markers located in the small intestine, ascending colon, transverse colon, descending colon, rectum, and outside the body immediately after the first acupuncture treatment and at 6, 12, 24, and 48 hours. After a 2-week washout period, the real acupuncture group in the first session was treated with sham acupuncture in the second session, and vice versa. Gastrointestinal motility was generally reduced in the real acupuncture group compared with the sham acupuncture group throughout the 4 different time points. A significant difference was observed at 24 hours following the first acupuncture treatment (P < 0.05).Entities:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23762166 PMCID: PMC3670549 DOI: 10.1155/2013/918392
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Demographics of study participants at baseline.
| Mean ± SD ( | Minimum | Maximum | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (year) | 22.0 ± 1.9 | 19 | 25 |
| Height (cm) | 173.0 ± 34.3 | 165 | 183 |
| Weight (kg) | 71.0 ± 8.0 | 59 | 88 |
| Body temperature (°C) | 36.6 ± 0.2 | 36 | 37 |
| Blood pressure (mmHg) | |||
| Systolic | 120.0 ± 8.7 | 100 | 130 |
| Diastolic | 80.0 ± 6.0 | 70 | 90 |
| Pulse (beats/min) | 74.0 ± 5.8 | 58 | 82 |
Results are reported as mean ± standard deviation (SD).
Figure 1CONSORT flow chart.
Figure 2Study scheme. Subjects were administered 15 mg of mosapride citrate per day (3 treatments of 5 mg) for 2 days starting 24 hours before the first acupuncture treatment. Immediately after the administration of radio markers, acupuncture treatment was conducted at 12-hour intervals. Gastrointestinal motility was measured via radiography immediately after the first acupuncture treatment and at 6, 12, 24, and 48 hours thereafter.
Figure 3Acupoints and illustration of the alimentary canal. (a) Siguan acupoints (bilateral LI4 and LR3) and sham acupoints. The sham acupoints were applied to the nonacupoints 2-3 cm laterally from LI4 and LR3 on both hands and feet. (b) A simple illustration of the alimentary canal. Abbreviations: ST, stomach; SI, small intestine; AC, ascending colon; TC, transverse colon; DC, descending colon; SR, sigmoid/rectum; and OB, outside body.
Change in exponential weighted score at four different time points.
| Time point | Group | Exponential weighted score |
|
| 95% confidence interval |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6 h | RA group | 12.8 ± 10.9 | 0.458 | 0.653 | (7.6, 18.0) |
| SA group | 14.1 ± 9.80 | (9.4, 18.8) | |||
| 12 h | RA group | 43.5 ± 16.2 | 1.112 | 0.282 | (35.8, 51.2) |
| SA group | 49.6 ± 22.8 | (38.7, 60.4) | |||
| 24 h | RA group | 66.9 ± 20.0 | 2.220 | 0.041* | (57.5, 76.4) |
| SA group | 76.1 ± 17.1 | (68.0, 84.3) | |||
| 48 h | RA group | 92.1 ± 13.5 | 1.258 | 0.226 | (85.7, 98.5) |
| SA group | 96.1 ± 7.70 | (92.4, 99.7) |
The results show altered values of the weighted score for radio-markers movement in the RA and SA groups at four different time points compared with time 0. The results are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation.
*Represents a significant difference between the two groups with P < 0.05 as assessed via Student's t-test.
Frequency of defecation during the treatments.
| Time point | Group | Frequency of defecation (times/day) |
|
| 95% confidence interval |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before trial | Total subjects | 0.9 ± 0.4 | — | — | — |
| 24 h | RA group | 1.3 ± 0.9 | −0.477 | 0.637 | (0.9, 1.7) |
| SA group | 1.1 ± 1.3 | (0.5, 1.7) | |||
| 48 h | RA group | 1.3 ± 0.9 | 0.000 | 1.000 | (0.9, 1.7) |
| SA group | 1.3 ± 0.9 | (0.9, 1.7) |
The results show the defecation frequency of the RA and SA groups at three different time points. No statistical significance was observed between the two groups.