| Literature DB >> 23761818 |
Xiao-Fei Ding1, Mao Shen, Li-Ying Xu, Jin-Hua Dong, Guang Chen.
Abstract
Elemene has been approved for the treatment of advanced cancer in China, however, it inhibits cell growth only at high concentrations and is an essential oil with poor water solubility and stability. The discovery of new β-elemene derivatives is of increasing interest. We recently reported that the compound 13,14-bis(cis-3,5-dimethyl-1-piperazinyl)-β-elemene (IIi), a novel β-elemene derivative with a cis-2,6-dimethylpiperazine substitution, is a potent agent for inhibiting the proliferation of SGC-7901 and HeLa cells. In the present study, we further verified that IIi is cytotoxic to a wide spectrum of human cancer cells in culture, including those of breast, ovarian, lung, gastric, hepatocellular and colon cancer, as well as leukemia cell lines, with an average IC50 of 3.44 μmol/l. Notably, IIi showed significant cytotoxicity in two multidrug-resistant (MDR) cell lines, with an average resistance factor (RF) of 1.66. Moreover, in mice with S-180 sarcoma xenografts, the intraperitoneal administration of IIi inhibited tumor growth. The immunoblotting study showed that treatment with IIi decreases phosphorylated p70S6K1 and 4EBP1 levels in the human breast cancer MCF-7 and MDA-MB-468 cells. In the MCF-7 cells, IIi also significantly increased the expression of cleaved LC3. This indicated that IIi inhibits mTOR activity and induces autophagy. The mTOR inhibitory function and the potent antitumor activity, taken together with the appreciable anti-multidrug resistance action, shows IIi to be a novel potential antitumor agent, which merits further research and development.Entities:
Keywords: 13,14-bis(cis-3,5-dimethyl-1-piperazinyl)-β-elemene; autophagy; cancer; mTOR; β-elemene
Year: 2013 PMID: 23761818 PMCID: PMC3678516 DOI: 10.3892/ol.2013.1213
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oncol Lett ISSN: 1792-1074 Impact factor: 2.967
Figure 1Antitumor activity of IIi in vitro. (A) Chemical structure of IIi and β-elemene. (B) Cytotoxicity of IIi against a panel of human tumor cell lines. Cells were treated with various concentrations of IIi for 72 h. Cell viability was determined by sulforhodamine B (SRB) assay or cell counting kit-8 (CCK-8). The columns show the mean IC50 values of three independent experiments and the bars represent the SD. IIi, 13,14-bis(cis-3,5-dimethyl-1-piperazinyl)-β-elemene.
Cytotoxicity of IIi in MDR and drug-sensitive parental cell lines.
| IC50 (mean ± SD, n=3) ( | IC50 (mean ± SD, n=3) ( | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Compounds | K562 | K562/A02 | RF | MCF-7 | MCF-7/ADR | RF |
| IIi | 2.2±0.5 | 3.1±0.4 | 1.41 | 1.2±0.2 | 2.3±0.3 | 1.92 |
| β-elemene | 256.7±49.5 | 309.8±43.2 | 1.21 | 306.9±60.7 | 326.7±69.2 | 1.06 |
| ADR | 0.4±0.2 | 50.2±7.8 | 125.50 | 1.8±0.4 | 160.3±38.2 | 89.06 |
Resistance factor (RF) was calculated as the ratio of the IC50 value of the MDR cells to that of the corresponding sensitive parental cells. IIi, 13,14-bis(cis-3,5-dimethyl-1-piperazinyl)-β-elemene; ADR, Adriamycin; MDR, multidrug-resistant. P<0.05, vs. NS group
Effects of IIi on the growth of S-180 sarcoma in mice.
| Treatment group | Dosage (i.p.)/(mg/kg/day) x no. of days | Mouse number (start/end) | Body weight (g)
| Tumor weight (g) | Inhibition rate (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Start | End | |||||
| NS | - | 20/20 | 20.02±2.13 | 23.20±4.01 | 1.19±0.12 | - |
| CTX | 30×7 | 10/9 | 20.03±1.95 | 17.59±2.34 | 0.31±0.09 | 73.9 |
| β-elemene | 50×7 | 10/10 | 20.24±1.87 | 23.14±3.56 | 0.68±0.13 | 42.8 |
| IIi | 40×7 | 10/9 | 20.64±1.94 | 19.62±3.47 | 0.59±0.14 | 50.4 |
| 20×7 | 10/9 | 20.00±1.83 | 19.64±2.43 | 0.88±0.23 | 26.0 | |
| 10×7 | 10/10 | 20.11±1.96 | 22.83±1.64 | 1.06±0.14 | 10.9 | |
Values are the mean ± SD of at least three independent experiments;
P<0.01,
P<0.05, vs. NS group. A Student’s t-test was used to assess the significance of the tumor growth inhibition of each group compared with the NS-treated group. NS, normal saline; CTX, cyclophosphamide; IIi, 13,14-bis(cis-3,5-dimethyl-1-piperazinyl)-β-elemene; i.p., intraperitoneal.
Figure 2Effects of IIi on the mTOR pathway in breast cancer cells. The cells were treated with vehicle, IIi, β-elemene or rapamycin for 2 h and analyzed by immunoblotting. GAPDH was employed as a loading control. The data shown are representative of at least three independent experiments. IIi, 13,14-bis(cis-3,5-dimethyl-1-piperazinyl)-β-elemene.
Figure 3IIi induces autophagy in human breast cancer MCF-7 cells. (A) MCF-7 cells overexpressing EGFP-LC3 were treated with or without 1 μmol/l IIi, 250 μmol/l β-elemene and 0.1 μmol/l rapamycin for 2 h. The cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA)-PBS for 15 min at room temperature and then the fix solution was washed with PBS three times. The punctate pattern of the EGFP-LC3 fusion protein (green) was visualized with fluorescence microscopy at x40 magnification. Nuclei were stained with DAPI (blue). (B) MCF-7 cells were treated with or without 1 μmol/l IIi, 250 μmol/l β-elemene and 0.1 μmol/l rapamycin for 2 h, and then harvested for protein analysis. Cell lysates were resolved in SDS-PAGE and probed with a specific antibody against LC3. GAPDH was employed as a loading control. Data shown are representative of at least three independent experiments. IIi, 13,14-bis(cis-3,5-dimethyl-1-piperazinyl)-β-elemene.