Richard Corrigall1, Dinesh Bhugra. 1. Snowsfields Adolescent Unit, Maudsley Hospital, Denmark Hill, London SE5 8AZ, UK. richard.corrigall@slam.nhs.uk
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To explore whether ethnic variations in psychiatric admission and detention reported for adults also apply to adolescents and to establish the influence of diagnosis. DESIGN: A longitudinal, case-note study over a 10-year period. SETTING: An adolescent inpatient psychiatric unit in London. PARTICIPANTS: All adolescents admitted to the unit. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Rates of admission and detention under the Mental Health Act, according to catchment area population. RESULTS: Young Black people were nearly six times more likely than the White group to be admitted with psychosis but showed no increase in admission for non-psychotic conditions. Young people in the Other group were over three times more likely to be admitted with psychosis but showed only a modest increase in admission with non-psychotic conditions. Young Asians were over twice as likely to be admitted with psychosis but were only one-third as likely to be admitted with non-psychotic conditions. Young people with psychosis in the Black and Other groups were around three times more likely to have been detained, but there were no significant differences for non-psychotic conditions. CONCLUSIONS: Significant ethnic variation was found in the rates of admission and detention for adolescents. However, diagnosis was also an important consideration and must be taken into account when examining for evidence of ethnic bias in the use of mental health services by young people. Further investigation is required to establish whether adolescent care pathways are providing a safe and appropriate level of inpatient care for all ethnic groups.
OBJECTIVES: To explore whether ethnic variations in psychiatric admission and detention reported for adults also apply to adolescents and to establish the influence of diagnosis. DESIGN: A longitudinal, case-note study over a 10-year period. SETTING: An adolescent inpatient psychiatric unit in London. PARTICIPANTS: All adolescents admitted to the unit. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Rates of admission and detention under the Mental Health Act, according to catchment area population. RESULTS: Young Black people were nearly six times more likely than the White group to be admitted with psychosis but showed no increase in admission for non-psychotic conditions. Young people in the Other group were over three times more likely to be admitted with psychosis but showed only a modest increase in admission with non-psychotic conditions. Young Asians were over twice as likely to be admitted with psychosis but were only one-third as likely to be admitted with non-psychotic conditions. Young people with psychosis in the Black and Other groups were around three times more likely to have been detained, but there were no significant differences for non-psychotic conditions. CONCLUSIONS: Significant ethnic variation was found in the rates of admission and detention for adolescents. However, diagnosis was also an important consideration and must be taken into account when examining for evidence of ethnic bias in the use of mental health services by young people. Further investigation is required to establish whether adolescent care pathways are providing a safe and appropriate level of inpatient care for all ethnic groups.
Authors: Scott Weich; James Nazroo; Kerry Sproston; Sally McManus; Martin Blanchard; Bob Erens; Saffron Karlsen; Michael King; Keith Lloyd; Stephen Stansfeld; Peter Tyrer Journal: Psychol Med Date: 2004-11 Impact factor: 7.723
Authors: Paul Fearon; James B Kirkbride; Craig Morgan; Paola Dazzan; Kevin Morgan; Tuhina Lloyd; Gerard Hutchinson; Jane Tarrant; Wai Lun Alan Fung; John Holloway; Rosemarie Mallett; Glynn Harrison; Julian Leff; Peter B Jones; Robin M Murray Journal: Psychol Med Date: 2006-08-29 Impact factor: 7.723
Authors: Neil R Smith; Charlotte Clark; Melanie Smuk; Steven Cummins; Stephen A Stansfeld Journal: Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol Date: 2015-07-24 Impact factor: 4.328
Authors: Ailing Fu; Bo Liu; Yu Jiang; Junling Zhao; Guanghui Zhang; Jiwen Liu Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2017-01-05 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Zeliha Özlü-Erkilic; Thomas Wenzel; Oswald D Kothgassner; Türkan Akkaya-Kalayci Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-09-07 Impact factor: 3.390