BACKGROUND: Manual changeover of vasoactive drug infusion pumps (CVIP) frequently lead to haemodynamic instability. Some of the newest smart pumps allow automated CVIP. The aim of this study was to compare automated CVIP with manual 'Quick Change' relays. METHODS: We performed a prospective, quasi-experimental study, in a university-affiliated intensive care unit (ICU). All adult patients receiving continuous i.v. infusion of vasoactive drugs were included. CVIP were successively performed manually (Phase 1) and automatically (Phase 2) during two 6-month periods. The primary endpoint was the frequency of haemodynamic incidents related to the relays, which were defined as variations of mean arterial pressure >15 mm Hg or heart rate >15 bpm. The secondary endpoints were the nursing time dedicated to relays and the number of interruptions in care because of CVIP. A multivariate mixed effects logistic regression was fitted for analytic analysis. RESULTS: We studied 1329 relays (Phase 1: 681, Phase 2: 648) from 133 patients (Phase 1: 63, Phase 2: 70). Incidents related to CVIP decreased from 137 (20%) in Phase 1 to 73 (11%) in Phase 2 (P<0.001). Automated relays were independently associated with a 49% risk reduction of CVIP-induced incidents (adjusted OR=0.51, 95% confidence interval 0.34-0.77, P=0.001). Time dedicated to the relays and the number of interruptions in care to manage CVIP were also significantly reduced with automated relays vs manual relays (P=0.001). CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate the benefits of automated CVIP using smart pumps in limiting the frequency of haemodynamic incidents related to relays and in reducing the nursing workload.
BACKGROUND: Manual changeover of vasoactive drug infusion pumps (CVIP) frequently lead to haemodynamic instability. Some of the newest smart pumps allow automated CVIP. The aim of this study was to compare automated CVIP with manual 'Quick Change' relays. METHODS: We performed a prospective, quasi-experimental study, in a university-affiliated intensive care unit (ICU). All adult patients receiving continuous i.v. infusion of vasoactive drugs were included. CVIP were successively performed manually (Phase 1) and automatically (Phase 2) during two 6-month periods. The primary endpoint was the frequency of haemodynamic incidents related to the relays, which were defined as variations of mean arterial pressure >15 mm Hg or heart rate >15 bpm. The secondary endpoints were the nursing time dedicated to relays and the number of interruptions in care because of CVIP. A multivariate mixed effects logistic regression was fitted for analytic analysis. RESULTS: We studied 1329 relays (Phase 1: 681, Phase 2: 648) from 133 patients (Phase 1: 63, Phase 2: 70). Incidents related to CVIP decreased from 137 (20%) in Phase 1 to 73 (11%) in Phase 2 (P<0.001). Automated relays were independently associated with a 49% risk reduction of CVIP-induced incidents (adjusted OR=0.51, 95% confidence interval 0.34-0.77, P=0.001). Time dedicated to the relays and the number of interruptions in care to manage CVIP were also significantly reduced with automated relays vs manual relays (P=0.001). CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate the benefits of automated CVIP using smart pumps in limiting the frequency of haemodynamic incidents related to relays and in reducing the nursing workload.
Entities:
Keywords:
care workload; critical care nursing; shock; smart pumps; vasoactive drugs
Authors: Tomasz Chroboczek; Martin Cour; Romain Hernu; Thomas Baudry; Julien Bohé; Vincent Piriou; Bernard Allaouchiche; François Disant; Laurent Argaud Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-05-06 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Martin Cour; Thomas Bénet; Romain Hernu; Marie Simon; Thomas Baudry; Philippe Vanhems; Laurent Argaud Journal: Ann Intensive Care Date: 2016-04-22 Impact factor: 6.925
Authors: Frank Doesburg; Fokie Cnossen; Willem Dieperink; Wouter Bult; Anne Marie de Smet; Daan J Touw; Maarten W Nijsten Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-08-11 Impact factor: 3.240