Literature DB >> 23761082

Ocular rigidity, outflow facility, ocular pulse amplitude, and pulsatile ocular blood flow in open-angle glaucoma: a manometric study.

Anna I Dastiridou1, Evangelia E Tsironi, Miltiadis K Tsilimbaris, Harilaos Ginis, Nikos Karyotakis, Pierros Cholevas, Sofia Androudi, Ioannis G Pallikaris.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare ocular rigidity (OR) and outflow facility (C) coefficients in medically treated open-angle glaucoma (OAG) patients and controls, and to investigate differences in ocular pulse amplitude (OPA) and pulsatile ocular blood flow (POBF) between the two groups.
METHODS: Twenty-one OAG patients and 21 controls undergoing cataract surgery were enrolled. Patients with early or moderate primary or pseudoexfoliative OAG participated in the glaucoma group. A computer-controlled system, consisting of a pressure transducer and a microstepping device was employed intraoperatively. After cannulation of the anterior chamber, IOP was increased by infusing the eye with microvolumes of saline solution. IOP was recorded after each infusion step. At an IOP of 40 mm Hg, an IOP decay curve was recorded for 4 minutes. OR coefficients, C, OPA, and POBF were estimated from IOP and volume recordings.
RESULTS: There were no differences in age or axial length in the two groups. The OR coefficient was 0.0220 ± 0.0053 μl(-1) in the OAG and 0.0222 ± 0.0039 μl(-1) in the control group (P = 0.868). C was 0.092 ± 0.082 μL/min/mm Hg in the glaucoma group compared with 0.149 ± 0.085 μL/min/mm Hg in the control group at an IOP of 35 mm Hg (P < 0.001) and 0.178 ± 0.133 μL/min/mm Hg vs. 0.292 ± 0.166 μL/min/mm Hg, respectively, at an IOP of 25 mm Hg (P < 0.001). There were no differences in OPA or POBF between the two groups in baseline and increased levels of IOP (P > 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Manometric data reveal lower C in OAG patients and increased C with increasing IOP. There were no differences in the OR coefficient, OPA, and POBF between medically treated OAG patients and controls, failing to provide evidence of altered scleral distensibility and choroidal blood flow in OAG.

Entities:  

Keywords:  aqueous outflow; biomechanics; blood flow; glaucoma

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23761082     DOI: 10.1167/iovs.13-12303

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  9 in total

Review 1.  The connective tissue phenotype of glaucomatous cupping in the monkey eye - Clinical and research implications.

Authors:  Hongli Yang; Juan Reynaud; Howard Lockwood; Galen Williams; Christy Hardin; Luke Reyes; Cheri Stowell; Stuart K Gardiner; Claude F Burgoyne
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  2017-03-12       Impact factor: 21.198

2.  Estimating outflow facility through pressure dependent pathways of the human eye.

Authors:  David W Smith; Bruce S Gardiner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Ocular rigidity and outflow facility in nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy.

Authors:  Theonitsa Panagiotoglou; Miltiadis Tsilimbaris; Harilaos Ginis; Nikos Karyotakis; Vaggelis Georgiou; Pavlos Koutentakis; Ioannis Pallikaris
Journal:  J Diabetes Res       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 4.011

4.  Glaucoma-related Changes in the Mechanical Properties and Collagen Micro-architecture of the Human Sclera.

Authors:  Baptiste Coudrillier; Jacek K Pijanka; Joan L Jefferys; Adhiraj Goel; Harry A Quigley; Craig Boote; Thao D Nguyen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-10       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Comparison of Aqueous Outflow Facility Measurement by Pneumatonography and Digital Schiøtz Tonography.

Authors:  Arash Kazemi; Jay W McLaren; Shuai-Chun Lin; Carol B Toris; Vikas Gulati; Sayoko E Moroi; Arthur J Sit
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 4.799

6.  Reduced Pulsatile Trabecular Meshwork Motion in Eyes With Primary Open Angle Glaucoma Using Phase-Sensitive Optical Coherence Tomography.

Authors:  Kai Gao; Shaozhen Song; Murray A Johnstone; Qinqin Zhang; Jingjiang Xu; Xiulan Zhang; Ruikang K Wang; Joanne C Wen
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 4.799

7.  Influence of Corneal Visualization Scheimpflug Technology Tonometry on Intraocular Pressure.

Authors:  Davide Borroni; Kunal Ajit Gadhvi; Rozaliya Hristova; Keri McLean; Carlos Rocha de Lossada; Vito Romano; Stephen Kaye
Journal:  Ophthalmol Sci       Date:  2021-01-13

8.  Comparison of Corneal Wave Speed and Ocular Rigidity in Normal and Glaucomatous Eyes.

Authors:  Arash Kazemi; Boran Zhou; Xiaoming Zhang; Arthur J Sit
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 2.290

9.  The Association Between Ocular Rigidity and Neuroretinal Damage in Glaucoma.

Authors:  Diane N Sayah; Javier Mazzaferri; Denise Descovich; Santiago Costantino; Mark R Lesk
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2020-11-02       Impact factor: 4.799

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.