Literature DB >> 23760755

Transvaginal specimen removal after laparoscopic distal pancreatic resection.

Hamid Mofid1, Alice Emmermann, Margret Alm, Carsten Zornig.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Transvaginal specimen removal has been introduced 20 years ago but then abandoned. With the advent of transvaginal interventions following the introduction of natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery, renewed interest was generated for hybrid procedures with minimal access for the intervention and use of transvaginal (TV) specimen removal. We present the first such series after laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy.
METHODS: In seven subsequent women (median age 48 years) with body and tail pancreatic tumors undergoing laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy, the new method of TV specimen removal was applied. The patients' data and the technical successes as well as intra- and postprocedural complications were recorded prospectively. The patients were followed after discharge for gynecological examination.
RESULTS: Specimen removal consisting of the pancreas and spleen in five and the pancreas only in two cases was technically successful; no intraoperative complications were encountered. Postoperative complications consisted of one case of intra-abdominal hemorrhage and one case of pancreatic fistula, attributable to the resection and not to TV specimen removal. Gynecological follow-up was normal in all seven patients.
CONCLUSIONS: The technique of TV specimen removal is feasible and safe also after laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy. It may help to further diminish the access trauma of laparoscopic pancreatic surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23760755     DOI: 10.1007/s00423-013-1092-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg        ISSN: 1435-2443            Impact factor:   3.445


  21 in total

1.  Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy: a clinical and cost-effectiveness study.

Authors:  Mohammad Abu Hilal; Mohammed Hamdan; Francesco Di Fabio; Neil W Pearce; Colin D Johnson
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-12-17       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy is associated with significantly less overall morbidity compared to the open technique: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Raghunandan Venkat; Barish H Edil; Richard D Schulick; Anne O Lidor; Martin A Makary; Christopher L Wolfgang
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Cheng-Jun Sui; Bin Li; Jia-Mei Yang; Shuang-Jia Wang; Yan-Ming Zhou
Journal:  Asian J Surg       Date:  2012-05-22       Impact factor: 2.767

4.  Prospective randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic cholecystectomy and hybrid natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) (NCT00835250).

Authors:  José F Noguera; Angel Cuadrado; Carlos Dolz; José M Olea; Juan C García
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-05-31       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 5.  Laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy for patients with symptomatic cholecystolithiasis.

Authors:  F Keus; J A F de Jong; H G Gooszen; C J H M van Laarhoven
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2006-10-18

6.  Transvaginal liver resection (NOTES) combined with minilaparoscopy.

Authors:  J F Noguera; C Dolz; A Cuadrado; J M Olea; A Vilella
Journal:  Rev Esp Enferm Dig       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 2.086

Review 7.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of case-matched studies comparing open and laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: is it a safe procedure?

Authors:  Stephanos Pericleous; Nicos Middleton; Siobhan Chloe McKay; Kaye Amelia Bowers; Robert Rayner Hutchins
Journal:  Pancreas       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 3.327

8.  Transvaginal rigid-hybrid NOTES cholecystectomy: evaluation in routine clinical practice.

Authors:  G R Linke; I Tarantino; R Hoetzel; R Warschkow; J Lange; R Lachat; A Zerz
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2010-04-29       Impact factor: 10.093

9.  Laparoscopic splenectomy. Technique and results in a series of 27 cases.

Authors:  A Emmermann; C Zornig; M Peiper; H J Weh; C E Broelsch
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  [Colpotomy for specimen removal in laparoscopic surgery].

Authors:  C Zornig; A Emmermann; H A von Waldenfels; C Felixmüller
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 0.955

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Transvaginal specimen removal in minimally invasive surgery.

Authors:  Panagiotis Kallidonis; Vasilis Panagopoulos; Iason Kyriazis; Marinos Vasilas; Evangelos Liatsikos
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-01-30       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Complications in Transvaginal Approach in Laparoscopic Surgery.

Authors:  Andrzej L Komorowski; Francisco Alba Mesa; Małgorzata M Bała; Jerzy W Mituś; Wojciech M Wysocki
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 0.656

3.  Long-term outcomes after Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction versus conventional laparoscopy-assisted surgery for rectal cancer: a matched case-control study.

Authors:  Jun Seok Park; Hyun Kang; Soo Yeun Park; Hye Jin Kim; In Taek Lee; Gyu-Seog Choi
Journal:  Ann Surg Treat Res       Date:  2017-12-28       Impact factor: 1.859

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.