Literature DB >> 23760155

The systemic inflammatory response syndrome in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

Sean van Diepen1, John P Vavalle, L Kristin Newby, Robert Clare, Karen S Pieper, Justin A Ezekowitz, Judith S Hochman, Kenneth W Mahaffey, Paul W Armstrong, Christopher B Granger.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess whether systemic inflammatory response syndrome is associated with morbidity and mortality in ST-elevation myocardial infarction. DESIGN AND
SETTING: Secondary analysis of multicenter randomized controlled trials. PATIENTS: Complement and reduction of infarct size after angioplasty or lytics project patients (n=1,903) with ST-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing fibrinolysis or mechanical reperfusion.
INTERVENTIONS: None.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The prevalence of systemic inflammatory response syndrome was described in the 1,186 patients (64.4%) with data available for all systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria. Using multiple imputations for the 1,843 patients (96.8%) with available endpoints, we compared the 90-day prevalence of death, shock, heart failure, or stroke between patients with and without systemic inflammatory response syndrome at presentation and at 24 hours post admission. Systemic inflammatory response syndrome was defined as ≥2 of 1) heart rate>90 beats/min, 2) respiratory rate>20 breaths/min, 3) body temperature>38 or <36°C, or 4) leukocyte count>12 or<4×10/L. At presentation, 25.0% of patients met systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria; at 24 hours, 8.1% of patients met systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria. The primary outcome was more frequent among patients with systemic inflammatory response syndrome at presentation (31.0% vs 16.7%; adjusted hazard ratio, 1.78 [95% CI, 1.35-2.34]; p<0.001) and at 24 hours (36.7% vs 11.1%; adjusted hazard ratio, 2.84 [95% CI, 2.03-3.97]; p<0.001). Mortality at 90 days was also higher among patients with systemic inflammatory response syndrome at either time point. Each additional systemic inflammatory response syndrome criterion was independently associated with 90-day outcomes at the time of presentation (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.41 per systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria [95% CI, 1.24-1.61]; p<0.001) and at 24 hours (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.72 per systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria [95% CI, 1.47-2.01]; p<0.001).
CONCLUSION: The diagnosis of systemic inflammatory response syndrome and the cumulative number of systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria were independently associated with 90-day clinical outcomes in a population of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction. The independent association of this simple composite measure of the inflammatory response with outcomes underscores the importance of the clinical inflammatory response in ST-elevation myocardial infarction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23760155     DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31828a67b2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0090-3493            Impact factor:   7.598


  9 in total

1.  Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome is an Independent Predictor of One-Year Mortality in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction.

Authors:  Wei-Chieh Huang; Ruey-Hsing Chou; Chun-Chin Chang; Chien-Yi Hsu; Yu-Chen Ku; Hsiu-Fen Huang; Yi-Chieh Chen; Po-Hsun Huang
Journal:  Acta Cardiol Sin       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 2.672

2.  Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome and Outcomes in Intracerebral Hemorrhage.

Authors:  Amelia K Boehme; Angela N Hays; Kimberly P Kicielinski; Kanika Arora; Niren Kapoor; Michael J Lyerly; Alissa Gadpaille; Harn Shiue; Karen Albright; David Miller; Mitchell S V Elkind; Mark R Harrigan
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 3.210

3.  Profiling the Evolution of Inflammatory Response and Exploring Its Prognostic Significance in Acute Myocardial Infarction: The First Step to Establishing Anti-Inflammatory Strategy.

Authors:  Hung-Ju Lin; Tzung-Dau Wang
Journal:  Acta Cardiol Sin       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 2.672

4.  Characterizing the relationship between systemic inflammatory response syndrome and early cardiac dysfunction in traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Nophanan Chaikittisilpa; Vijay Krishnamoorthy; Abhijit V Lele; Qian Qiu; Monica S Vavilala
Journal:  J Neurosci Res       Date:  2017-06-02       Impact factor: 4.164

5.  Systemic inflammatory response syndrome, infection, and outcome in intracerebral hemorrhage.

Authors:  Amelia K Boehme; Mary E Comeau; Carl D Langefeld; Aaron Lord; Charles J Moomaw; Jennifer Osborne; Michael L James; Sharyl Martini; Fernando D Testai; Daniel Woo; Mitchell S V Elkind
Journal:  Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm       Date:  2017-12-22

6.  Differential responses to larger volume intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation: Hemodynamic and clinical outcomes.

Authors:  David A Baran; Gautam K Visveswaran; Ahmed Seliem; Michael DiVita; Najam Wasty; Marc Cohen
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2017-10-31       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 7.  Cardiogenic Shock.

Authors:  Cyrus Vahdatpour; David Collins; Sheldon Goldberg
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2019-04-16       Impact factor: 5.501

8.  Concomitant Sepsis Diagnoses in Acute Myocardial Infarction-Cardiogenic Shock: 15-Year National Temporal Trends, Management, and Outcomes.

Authors:  Jacob C Jentzer; Anusha G Bhat; Sri Harsha Patlolla; Shashank S Sinha; P Elliott Miller; Patrick R Lawler; Sean van Diepen; Ashish K Khanna; David X Zhao; Saraschandra Vallabhajosyula
Journal:  Crit Care Explor       Date:  2022-02-04

Review 9.  ST-elevation myocardial infarction following systemic inflammatory response syndrome.

Authors:  Ying Tan; Yan Tu; Di Tian; Chen Li; Jian-Kai Zhong; Zhi-Gang Guo
Journal:  Cardiovasc J Afr       Date:  2015-05-23       Impact factor: 1.167

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.