Literature DB >> 23760039

Staged medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy for bilateral varus gonarthrosis: biomechanical and clinical outcomes.

Emily L Sischek1, Trevor B Birmingham, Kristyn M Leitch, Robin Martin, Kevin Willits, J Robert Giffin.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: (1) To evaluate the effect of staged bilateral medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy (HTO) on established biomechanical risk factors for disease progression and on validated measures of pain and function and (2) To compare outcomes in patients having the second surgery staged within or beyond 12 months of the first surgery.
METHODS: Thirty-seven patients with bilateral varus alignment and medial compartment osteoarthritis underwent staged bilateral medial opening wedge HTO (21 within and 16 beyond 12 months). Patients underwent full-limb standing anteroposterior radiographs to determine frontal plane alignment (mechanical axis angle) and three-dimensional gait analysis to estimate the distribution of load across the tibiofemoral compartments (external knee adduction moment). Patients also completed the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcomes Scores (KOOS), the Lower Extremity Functional Scale, the Short Form Health Survey and the six-minute walk test (6MWT). Patients (both limbs) were evaluated before and approximately 6, 12 and 24 months after each surgery.
RESULTS: There were statistically and clinically significant changes in both limbs that were of similar magnitudes and that remained relatively stable over time postoperatively. Mean (95% CI) improvements in outcomes were as follows. Mechanical axis angle: 9.4° (8.4°, 10.4°) (i.e. average change of both limbs), peak knee adduction moment: -1.7%BW*Ht (-2.1, -1.4 %BW*Ht) (i.e. average change of both limbs), 6MWT: 36.7 m (19.4, 54.0 m), SF-12 Physical Component Summary: 12.0 (8.5, 15.5) and KOOS Pain: 25.4 (19.6, 31.2). Other than the shorter time period to reach maximum benefit of both surgeries, there were no remarkable differences at final assessment between patients having surgeries staged within or beyond 12 months.
CONCLUSIONS: The present findings demonstrate that patients with bilateral varus gonarthrosis experience marked improvements in established biomechanical risk factors for disease progression bilaterally (mechanical axis angles and external knee adduction moments), as well as clinically important improvements in patient-important outcomes, after staged medial opening wedge HTO. Current findings suggest no difference in outcomes for patients who have the second surgery staged within or beyond 12 months of the first surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23760039     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-013-2559-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  34 in total

1.  Radiological assessment of osteo-arthrosis.

Authors:  J H KELLGREN; J S LAWRENCE
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1957-12       Impact factor: 19.103

2.  Short-term safety and efficacy of a novel high tibial osteotomy system: a case controlled study.

Authors:  Alan Getgood; Brett Collins; Konrad Slynarski; Emilia Kurowska; David Parker; Lars Engebretsen; Peter B MacDonald; Robert Litchfield
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Reliability of lower limb frontal plane alignment measurements using plain radiographs and digitized images.

Authors:  Adrian V Specogna; Trevor B Birmingham; Jerome J DaSilva; Jaques S Milner; Jacqueline Kerr; Michael A Hunt; Ian C Jones; Thomas R Jenkyn; Peter J Fowler; J Robert Giffin
Journal:  J Knee Surg       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 2.757

Review 4.  Preoperative planning for high tibial osteotomy. The effect of lateral tibiofemoral separation and tibiofemoral length.

Authors:  T W Dugdale; F R Noyes; D Styer
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  The relationship between toe-out angle during gait and progression of medial tibiofemoral osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Alison Chang; Debra Hurwitz; Dorothy Dunlop; Jing Song; September Cahue; Karen Hayes; Leena Sharma
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2007-01-31       Impact factor: 19.103

6.  Malalignment and subchondral bone turnover in contralateral knees of overweight/obese women with unilateral osteoarthritis: implications for bilateral disease.

Authors:  Steven A Mazzuca; Kenneth D Brandt; Kathleen A Lane; Rafael Chakr
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 4.794

7.  The Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS): scale development, measurement properties, and clinical application. North American Orthopaedic Rehabilitation Research Network.

Authors:  J M Binkley; P W Stratford; S A Lott; D L Riddle
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  1999-04

8.  Lateral trunk lean explains variation in dynamic knee joint load in patients with medial compartment knee osteoarthritis.

Authors:  M A Hunt; T B Birmingham; D Bryant; I Jones; J R Giffin; T R Jenkyn; A A Vandervoort
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2008-02-21       Impact factor: 6.576

9.  Test-retest reliability of the peak knee adduction moment during walking in patients with medial compartment knee osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Trevor B Birmingham; Michael A Hunt; Ian C Jones; Thomas R Jenkyn; J Robert Giffin
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2007-08-15

Review 10.  The Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS): from joint injury to osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Ewa M Roos; L Stefan Lohmander
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2003-11-03       Impact factor: 3.186

View more
  7 in total

1.  Clinical and radiographic outcomes of medial open-wedge high tibial osteotomy with Anthony-K plate: prospective minimum five year follow-up data.

Authors:  Mehmet Akif Altay; Cemil Ertürk; Nuray Altay; Ahmet Şükrü Mercan; Serkan Sipahioğlu; Ali Murat Kalender; Uğur Erdem Işıkan
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-07-21       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Gait analysis following medial opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy.

Authors:  Vincent Morin; Régis Pailhé; Brice Rubens Duval; Roch Mader; Jérémy Cognault; René-Christopher Rouchy; Dominique Saragaglia
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Knee joint distraction compared with high tibial osteotomy: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  J A D van der Woude; K Wiegant; R J van Heerwaarden; S Spruijt; P M van Roermund; R J H Custers; S C Mastbergen; F P J G Lafeber
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-04-22       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Change in adduction moment following medial open wedge high tibial osteotomy: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jun-Ho Kim; Hyun-Jung Kim; Haluk Celik; Joo-Hwan Kim; Dae-Hee Lee
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2019-03-06       Impact factor: 2.362

5.  Clinical course and outcomes of simultaneous-versus staged-bilateral medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy.

Authors:  Hiroyasu Ogawa; Kazu Matsumoto; Masaya Sengoku; Hiroki Yoshioka; Kyosuke Yamamoto; Tetsuya Shimokawa; Kazuichiro Ohnishi; Haruhiko Akiyama
Journal:  Asia Pac J Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Technol       Date:  2020-12-07

6.  Validation of the Questionnaire to Identify Knee Symptoms (QuIKS) using Rasch analysis.

Authors:  Clayon B Hamilton; Monica R Maly; J Robert Giffin; Jessica M Clark; Mark Speechley; Robert J Petrella; Bert M Chesworth
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2015-09-29       Impact factor: 3.186

7.  The Relationships between Coronal Plane Alignments and Patient-Reported Outcomes Following High Tibial Osteotomy: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Gwenllian Tawy; Hamza Shahbaz; Michael McNicholas; Leela Biant
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2021-04-22       Impact factor: 4.634

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.