Literature DB >> 23759969

Choosing the optimal timing for contralateral symmetry procedures after unilateral free flap breast reconstruction.

Edward I Chang1, Jesse C Selber, Eric I Chang, Naveed Nosrati, Hong Zhang, Geoffrey L Robb, David W Chang.   

Abstract

Achieving symmetry in unilateral free flap breast reconstruction often requires a contralateral procedure; however, no large studies exist that examine the factors related to revisions performed on the contralateral breast. The present study examines the relationship between revision and complication rate, and the type and timing of the contralateral procedure. Retrospective analysis was performed of all unilateral free flap breast reconstructions from January 2000 to December 2010 at a single academic institution. Overall, 1120 patients underwent unilateral free flap breast reconstruction with 558 (49.8%) patients undergoing a contralateral procedure, 154 (27.6%) immediate and 404 (72.4%) delayed. Contralateral procedures included 106 augmentations, 168 reductions, 240 mastopexies, and 37 augmentation-mastopexies. Revision of the symmetry procedure was performed in 114 (20.8%) patients. Augmentation and mastopexy were associated with significantly higher revision rates when performed immediately. The complication rate was higher in immediate contralateral procedures than delayed [15 (9.7%) vs 16 (4.0%), P = 0.01]. The average number of procedures per patient was significantly higher in delayed contralateral procedures than immediate (2.45 vs 1.84, P < 0.0005). In summary, approximately half of patients undergoing a unilateral free flap for breast reconstruction will also undergo a contralateral balancing procedure. Immediate contralateral augmentation and mastopexy carry a higher revision rate and consideration should be given to performing them in a staged fashion. There were no differences in the rate of revisions for breast reductions, and therefore, performance of simultaneous contralateral reduction is a reasonable option. Although complication rates were higher in the immediate cohort, overall "symmetry" was achieved in significantly fewer operations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 23759969     DOI: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e31828bb1e3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Plast Surg        ISSN: 0148-7043            Impact factor:   1.539


  5 in total

1.  Destination Design msTRAM: For Greater Reconstructive Certainty.

Authors:  Stahs Pripotnev; J Scott Williamson
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2021-07-28

2.  Immediate versus Delayed Contralateral Breast Symmetrisation in Breast Reconstruction with Latissimus dorsi Flap: A Comparative Study.

Authors:  Salvatore Giordano; Sofia Harkkila; Carlo M Oranges; Pietro G di Summa; Ilkka Koskivuo
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2019-09-17       Impact factor: 2.860

3.  The efficacy of simultaneous breast reconstruction and contralateral balancing procedures in reducing the need for second stage operations.

Authors:  Mark L Smith; Emily M Clarke-Pearson; Michael Vornovitsky; Joseph H Dayan; William Samson; Mark R Sultan
Journal:  Arch Plast Surg       Date:  2014-09-15

4.  Contralateral Augmentation with a Transmidline Scarless Technique During Unilateral Breast Reconstruction Using Implants.

Authors:  Olivia A Ho; Yi-Ling Lin; Jung-Ju Huang; Ming-Huei Cheng
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2017-05-19

5.  Contralateral internal mammary vessels - a rescue recipient vessels option in breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Artur Nixon Martins; João Nunes Pombo; Catarina Paias Gouveia; Bruno Gomes Rosa; Gaizka Ribeiro; Carlos Pinheiro
Journal:  Case Reports Plast Surg Hand Surg       Date:  2022-03-10
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.