Literature DB >> 23759814

Change in classification grade by the SRS-Schwab Adult Spinal Deformity Classification predicts impact on health-related quality of life measures: prospective analysis of operative and nonoperative treatment.

Justin S Smith1, Eric Klineberg, Frank Schwab, Christopher I Shaffrey, Bertrand Moal, Christopher P Ames, Richard Hostin, Kai-Ming G Fu, Douglas Burton, Behrooz Akbarnia, Munish Gupta, Robert Hart, Shay Bess, Virginie Lafage.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Multicenter, prospective, consecutive series.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate responsiveness of the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS)-Schwab adult spinal deformity (ASD) classification to changes in health-related quality of life (HRQOL) after treatment for ASD. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Ideally, a classification system should describe and be responsive to changes in a disease state. We hypothesized that the SRS-Schwab classification is responsive to changes in HRQOL measures after treatment for ASD.
METHODS: A multicenter, prospective, consecutive series from the International Spine Study Group. INCLUSION CRITERIA: ASD, age more than 18, operative or nonoperative treatment, baseline and 1-year radiographs, and HRQOL measures (Oswestry Disability Index [ODI], SRS-22, Short Form [SF]-36). The SRS-Schwab classification includes a curve descriptor and 3 sagittal spinopelvic modifiers (sagittal vertical axis [SVA], pelvic tilt, pelvic incidence/lumbar lordosis [PI-LL] mismatch). Changes in modifiers at 1 year were assessed for impact on HRQOL from pretreatment values based on minimal clinically important differences.
RESULTS: Three hundred forty-one patients met criteria (mean age = 54; 85% females; 177 operative and 164 nonoperative). Change in pelvic tilt modifier at 1-year follow-up was associated with changes in ODI and SRS-22 (total and appearance scores) (P ≤ 0.034). Change in SVA modifier at 1 year was associated with changes in ODI, SF-36 physical component score, and SRS-22 (total, activity, and appearance scores) (P ≤ 0.037). Change in PI-LL modifier at 1 year was associated with changes in SF-36 physical component score and SRS-22 (total, activity, and appearance scores) (P ≤ 0.03). Patients with improvement of pelvic tilt, SVA, or PI-LL modifiers were significantly more likely to achieve minimal clinically important difference for ODI, SF-36 physical component score (SVA and PI-LL only), SRS activity, and SRS pain (PI-LL only).
CONCLUSION: The SRS-Schwab classification provides a validated system to evaluate ASD, and the classification components correlate with HRQOL measures. This study demonstrates that the classification modifiers are responsive to changes in disease state and reflect significant changes in patient-reported outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23759814     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31829ec563

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  57 in total

1.  Volume and fat infiltration of spino-pelvic musculature in adults with spinal deformity.

Authors:  Bertrand Moal; Nicolas Bronsard; José G Raya; Jean Marc Vital; Frank Schwab; Wafa Skalli; Virginie Lafage
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2015-10-18

2.  Likelihood of reaching minimal clinically important difference in adult spinal deformity: a comparison of operative and nonoperative treatment.

Authors:  Shian Liu; Frank Schwab; Justin S Smith; Eric Klineberg; Christopher P Ames; Gregory Mundis; Richard Hostin; Khaled Kebaish; Vedat Deviren; Munish Gupta; Oheneba Boachie-Adjei; Robert A Hart; Shay Bess; Virginie Lafage
Journal:  Ochsner J       Date:  2014

3.  Classification of sagittal imbalance based on spinal alignment and compensatory mechanisms.

Authors:  Claudio Lamartina; Pedro Berjano
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Segmental Contributions to Lumbar Lordosis: A Computed Tomography Study.

Authors:  Joseph F Baker; Peter A Robertson
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-12-29

5.  Pelvic retroversion is the key protective mechanism of L4-5 degenerative spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  Hui Liu; Sibei Li; Zhaomin Zheng; Jiranru Wang; Huafeng Wang; Xiang Li
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-06-05       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Radiographic outcomes of anterior column realignment for adult sagittal plane deformity: a multicenter analysis.

Authors:  Jay D Turner; Behrooz A Akbarnia; Robert K Eastlack; Ramin Bagheri; Stacie Nguyen; Luiz Pimenta; Rex Marco; Vedat Deviren; Juan Uribe; Gregory M Mundis
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-03-28       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 7.  Role of minimally invasive surgery for adult spinal deformity in preventing complications.

Authors:  Chun-Po Yen; Yusef I Mosley; Juan S Uribe
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2016-09

8.  Do position and size matter? An analysis of cage and placement variables for optimum lordosis in PLIF reconstruction.

Authors:  Priyan R Landham; Angus S Don; Peter A Robertson
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 9.  Osteotomies in the treatment of spinal deformities: indications, classification, and surgical planning.

Authors:  Bassel Diebo; Shian Liu; Virginie Lafage; Frank Schwab
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2014-05-11

10.  Factors influencing radiographic and clinical outcomes in adult scoliosis surgery: a study of 448 European patients.

Authors:  Heiko Koller; Conny Pfanz; Oliver Meier; Wolfgang Hitzl; Michael Mayer; Viola Bullmann; Tobias L Schulte
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.