The lung cytokine gene expression profiles of mice infected with 2 strains of H4N8 viruses isolated from shorebirds and reference H4 viruses from ducks are compared. Major differences between the two H4N8 strains of shorebirds, one of which causes a severe respiratory disease in mice, are in the PB1 and NS1 genes. In mice with H4N8 virus induced pneumonia, overall expression of TNF-α, IL-6 and IL-12 genes was markedly higher than in mice infected with other H4 viruses tested, although gene expression of type I interferon was not increased until day 4 post viral infection. In contrast, in mice infected with a comparison H4N8 strain, gene expression of type I interferon peaked on day 1 post viral infection. Overall, the cytokine response corresponds with the severity of disease caused by shorebird H4N8 virus. The results obtained in this study provide valuable information to understand the immunopathology induced by a low pathogenic avian influenza virus, which may be useful in preparation for outbreaks of novel influenza A virus.
The lung cytokine gene expression profiles of mice infected with 2 strains of H4N8 viruses isolated from shorebirds and reference H4 viruses from ducks are compared. Major differences between the two H4N8 strains of shorebirds, one of which causes a severe respiratory disease in mice, are in the PB1 and NS1 genes. In mice with H4N8 virus induced pneumonia, overall expression of TNF-α, IL-6 and IL-12 genes was markedly higher than in mice infected with other H4 viruses tested, although gene expression of type I interferon was not increased until day 4 post viral infection. In contrast, in mice infected with a comparison H4N8 strain, gene expression of type I interferon peaked on day 1 post viral infection. Overall, the cytokine response corresponds with the severity of disease caused by shorebird H4N8 virus. The results obtained in this study provide valuable information to understand the immunopathology induced by a low pathogenic avian influenza virus, which may be useful in preparation for outbreaks of novel influenza A virus.
Interspecies transmission of Influenza A virus has been a major concern for public health
worldwide, since the first human cases of the H5N1 highly pathogenic avian influenza virus
(HPAIV) were reported in Hong Kong in 1997. Heightened concern was elevated with knowledge
that a direct chicken-to-human transmission of the virus occurred without having an
intermediate host, such as pigs [2]. Concern over direct
transmission of AIV to humans seemed to be further confirmed in the recent human cases of H7N9
AIVinfection, which include many fatal cases [36].
Previous studies have reported that AIVs, including those from wild birds, could naturally
infect and cause disease in a variety of mammalian species [13, 18, 19, 29]. In experimental settings, AIVs
isolated from wild birds have productively infected and induced lesions in the respiratory
tissues of mammalian hosts, such as mice and ferrets without requiring any adaptations to the
host species [1, 6, 10, 15]. Transmission of wild viral strains via direct contact in ferrets was also
reported, suggesting that AIVs carried by aquatic birds can potentially infect and transmit in
humans and other mammals without adaptation [7, 34]. It should be noted that many of these AIV strains
replicated efficiently in mouse lungs even in the absence of any lesions in tissues, although
some strains caused pulmonary lesions [1, 6]. These results suggest that factors, such as the
character of the host immune response, induced by infection, are involved in the extent of
viral pathogenicity.Upon infection with influenza virus, innate immune response promotes the release of
proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines as a part of an inflammatory response in the host.
Although proinflammatory cytokines are necessary for virus clearance, cytokine dysregulation,
sometimes referred to as a “cytokine storm”, contributes to disease severity. Severe cases of
human disease caused by H5N1 virus or pandemic H1N1 2009 virus involved viral pneumonia
associated with just such a cytokine storm [20, 23]. Furthermore, proinflammatory cytokine levels in the
blood stream of humans infected with H5N1 virus were much higher than those of humans infected
with seasonal influenza virus [23]. Similarly, in mouse
studies, H5N1infection resulted in elevated levels of proinflammatory cytokines and
chemokines in mouse lungs [24]. In addition to such
inflammatory responses, innate immune mechanisms in viral infection induce antiviral host
responses. Cytokines, such as type I interferons (IFNs), inhibit viral replication in a
variety of pathways in host cells. On the other hand, to replicate more efficiently in host
cells, viruses have developed mechanisms to abrogate these antiviral host immune responses.
Pathogenicity in influenza infection therefore depends on a combination of virally induced up
or down-regulation of host immune mechanisms, implicating a combination of virus and host
factors in disease severity [17, 21].We recently reported that the H4N8 subtype virus isolated in our AIV surveillance study in
wild birds, A/slaty-backed gull/Japan/6KS0185/2006 (6KS0185), caused severe respiratory
disease in mice [1]. The H4N8 isolate was genetically
highly related to A/red-necked stint/Australia/1/04 (Aus04) [14], except for significant differences in the PB1 and NS gene segments. Both
6KS0185 and Aus04 proliferated in mouse lungs to a similar level, but only 6KS0185 caused
severe respiratory disease in mice [1]. These results
suggested that other factors, in addition to the efficiency of viral replication, such as the
character of the host immune responses, were involved in the pathogenicity of 6KS0185 in
experimentally infected mice. In order to elucidate the role of host immune responses in this
disease severity, we investigated the cytokine profiles in the lungs of mice infected with
6KS0185 in comparison with those with infected with Aus04, A/duck/Osaka/1/05 (H4N8) (Osaka05),
A/duck/Shiga/8/04 (H4N6) (Shiga04) and A/duck/Czechoslovakia/56 (H4N6) (Czech56), all of which
do not cause any clinical symptoms in infected mice.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Viruses: 6KS0185 (H4N8), which was isolated from a gull fecal sample in
our surveillance study [1], was used in this study.
Aus04 (H4N8) was kindly provided by Dr. Aeron Hurt at the WHO Collaborating Centre for
Reference and Research on Influenza and the Victorian Infectious Diseases Reference
Laboratory. Osaka05 (H4N8) and Shiga04 (H4N6) were kindly provided by the National Institute
of Animal Health, Japan. Czech56 (H4N6) was supplied by Dr. H. Kida at the OIE Reference
Laboratory for HPAI at Hokkaido University, Japan. The seed viruses were propagated in the
allantoic cavity of 10-day-old embryonated chicken eggs for only one passage, and aliquots
of the allantoic fluids containing the viruses were stored at −80°C until use.Mouse lung samples obtained in the infection study: The lung homogenate
samples obtained in the mouseinfection study, which was described in our previous paper
[1], were used in this study. In the study, 8- to
10-week-old female BALB/c mice were intranasally infected with 6KS0185, Aus04, Osaka05,
Shiga04 or Czech56 at a dose of 103 TCID50 (n=15 in each group) in 50
µl of allantoic fluid. One group of mice, which received phosphate
buffered saline, served as a control group. On 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 7 days post infection
(dpi), mice were sacrificed, and lungs were obtained from the mice and processed as a 10%
homogenate preparation [1]. Total RNA was isolated
from the lung homogenate samples by using ISOGEN-LS (Nippon Gene, Tokyo, Japan) and
subjected to a real-time reverse transcription-PCR (RRT-PCR) for the quantification of lung
cytokine levels. All mouse studies were conducted in compliance with the institutional rules
for the care and use of laboratory animals and using protocols approved by the relevant
committee at the University.cDNA synthesis and RRT-PCR: Isolated RNA was converted to cDNA using
random primers (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, U.S.A.), and M-MLV reverse transcriptase
(Invitrogen). Reverse transcription reactions were carried out under the following
conditions: 25°C for 10 min, 37°C for 60 min and 60°C for 10 min. The RRT-PCR was performed
in an ABI PRISM 7900HT Sequence Detection System (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA,
U.S.A.) by TaqMan probe assay using the synthesized cDNA and EagleTaq Master Mix With ROX
(Roche Applied Science, Penzberg, Germany). To measure cytokine mRNA levels in the samples,
Taqman MGB probe and primer sets (Applied Biosystems) listed in Table 1 were used. A PCR cycle used was as follows: 95°C for 15 sec, 45 cycles of 95°C
for 15 sec and 60°C for 1 min. The threshold cycle (Ct) was defined as the number of cycles
required for the fluorescent signal to cross the threshold. The Ct values were normalized to
18S rRNA and calculated as fold changes in relation to the RNA sample obtained from
uninfected mice. The results were expressed as fold induction of gene expression (relative
quantity of template) using the comparative C(T) method [25].
Table 1.
Probe and primer sets (Taqman MGB, Applied Biosystems) used in real-time
RT-PCR
Gene name
Product number
TNF-α (Tumor necrosis factor alpha)
Mm00443528_m1
IL-6 (Interleukin 6)
Mm00446190_m1
IL-12 (Interleukin 12 alpha)
Mm00434165_m1
IFN-α11, 2 (Interferon alpha11, 2)
Mm04207507_Gh
IFN-β1 (Interferon beta1)
Mm00439546_sl
IFN-γ (Interferon gamma)
Mm01168134_ml
Eukaryotic 18S rRNA (Internal control)
ABI433860F
RESULTS
Proinflammatory cytokine expression was elevated in 6KS0185 infected mice:
In lungs of the mice infected with 6KS0185, TNF-α gene expression was elevated to the
highest level among all the samples tested in this study at 1 dpi. The TNF-α gene expression
decreased gradually to nearly normal levels at 4 dpi, but again increased dramatically on 5
to 7dpi when it again decreased, thus showing a biphasic pattern of expression change in
the 6KS0185-infected mouse lungs. Similarly, in lungs of the mice infected with Aus04 and
Czech56, TNF-α gene expression was elevated on 1 dpi, albeit not to as high a level as in
the 6KS0185-infected mice. The TNF-α gene expression level decreased gradually until 3 dpi
in these mice, and only slightly increased on 5 or 7 dpi. In contrast, changes in TNF-α gene
expression were marginal in lungs of the mice infected with Shiga04 and Osaka05 during 1–7
dpi (Fig. 1). Similarly to TNF-α, gene expression of IL-6 was markedly elevated at 1 dpi in lungs
of the mice infected with 6KS0185 and Aus04. In the 6KS0185-infected mice, the IL-6 gene
expression further increased on 2 dpi and then decreased gradually to the normal level by 7
dpi, whereas in lungs of the mice infected with Aus04, the elevated level of IL-6 gene
expression decreased to the normal level on 3 dpi. Elevation of IL-6 gene expression was
observed in lungs of the mice infected with Czech56 at lesser levels compared to those in
the mice infected with 6KS0185 and Aus04 and only slightly elevated in the mice infected
with the other 2 viruses (Fig. 2). In the 6KS0185-infected mice, IL-12 gene expression levels increased on 1 dpi and
remained elevated until 7 dpi, during which the highest level was observed on 2 dpi.
Moderate changes were observed in the IL-12 gene expression of Czech56-infected mice, but
only minor changes were observed in other groups including the Aus04-infected mice (Fig. 3).
Fig. 1.
TNF-α gene expression profiles in lungs of the mice infected with H4 subtype viruses.
(A) A/slaty-backed gull/Japan/6KS0185/2006 (H4N8), (B) A/red-necked
stint/Australia/1/04 (H4N8), (C) A/duck/Czechoslovakia/56 (H4N6), (D)
A/duck/Shiga/8/04 (H4N6), (E) A/duck/Osaka/1/05 (H4N8). RRT-PCR was
performed to measure TNF-α mRNA levels. The Ct values were normalized to 18S rRNA and
calculated as fold changes in relation to the mRNA obtained from uninfected normal
mice by the comparative C(T) method. The mean fold changes (closed circles) were
calculated from the results of two mice (striped bar and gray bar).
Fig. 2.
IL-6 gene expression profiles in lungs of the mice infected with H4 subtype viruses.
(A) A/slaty-backed gull/Japan/6KS0185/2006 (H4N8), (B) A/red-necked
stint/Australia/1/04 (H4N8), (C) A/duck/Czechoslovakia/56 (H4N6), (D)
A/duck/Shiga/8/04 (H4N6), (E) A/duck/Osaka/1/05 (H4N8). RRT-PCR was
performed to measure IL-6 mRNA levels. The Ct values were normalized to 18S rRNA and
calculated as fold changes in relation to the mRNA obtained from uninfected normal
mice by the comparative C(T) method. The mean fold changes (closed circles) were
calculated from the results of two mice (striped bar and gray bar).
Fig. 3.
IL-12 gene expression profiles in lungs of the mice infected with H4 subtype viruses.
(A) A/slaty-backed gull/Japan/6KS0185/2006 (H4N8), (B) A/red-necked
stint/Australia/1/04 (H4N8), (C) A/duck/Czechoslovakia/56 (H4N6), (D)
A/duck/Shiga/8/04 (H4N6), (E) A/duck/Osaka/1/05 (H4N8). RRT-PCR was
performed to measure IL-12 mRNA levels. The Ct values were normalized to 18S rRNA and
calculated as fold changes in relation to the mRNA obtained from uninfected normal
mice by the comparative C(T) method. The mean fold changes (closed circles) were
calculated from the results of two mice (striped bar and gray bar).
TNF-α gene expression profiles in lungs of the mice infected with H4 subtype viruses.
(A) A/slaty-backed gull/Japan/6KS0185/2006 (H4N8), (B) A/red-necked
stint/Australia/1/04 (H4N8), (C) A/duck/Czechoslovakia/56 (H4N6), (D)
A/duck/Shiga/8/04 (H4N6), (E) A/duck/Osaka/1/05 (H4N8). RRT-PCR was
performed to measure TNF-α mRNA levels. The Ct values were normalized to 18S rRNA and
calculated as fold changes in relation to the mRNA obtained from uninfected normal
mice by the comparative C(T) method. The mean fold changes (closed circles) were
calculated from the results of two mice (striped bar and gray bar).IL-6 gene expression profiles in lungs of the mice infected with H4 subtype viruses.
(A) A/slaty-backed gull/Japan/6KS0185/2006 (H4N8), (B) A/red-necked
stint/Australia/1/04 (H4N8), (C) A/duck/Czechoslovakia/56 (H4N6), (D)
A/duck/Shiga/8/04 (H4N6), (E) A/duck/Osaka/1/05 (H4N8). RRT-PCR was
performed to measure IL-6 mRNA levels. The Ct values were normalized to 18S rRNA and
calculated as fold changes in relation to the mRNA obtained from uninfected normal
mice by the comparative C(T) method. The mean fold changes (closed circles) were
calculated from the results of two mice (striped bar and gray bar).IL-12 gene expression profiles in lungs of the mice infected with H4 subtype viruses.
(A) A/slaty-backed gull/Japan/6KS0185/2006 (H4N8), (B) A/red-necked
stint/Australia/1/04 (H4N8), (C) A/duck/Czechoslovakia/56 (H4N6), (D)
A/duck/Shiga/8/04 (H4N6), (E) A/duck/Osaka/1/05 (H4N8). RRT-PCR was
performed to measure IL-12 mRNA levels. The Ct values were normalized to 18S rRNA and
calculated as fold changes in relation to the mRNA obtained from uninfected normal
mice by the comparative C(T) method. The mean fold changes (closed circles) were
calculated from the results of two mice (striped bar and gray bar).Antiviral cytokine expression was elevated slowly in 6KS0185-infected
mice: In the 6KS0185-infected mice, IFN-α gene expression did not markedly change
until 3 dpi, but drastically increased on 4 dpi. In contrast, the expression level of IFN-α
in the mice infected with Aus04 peaked on 1 dpi and dropped to the normal level on 3 dpi.
IFN-α gene expression was not detected in the mice infected with Osaka05, Shiga04 and
Czech56 throughout the period tested (Fig. 4). The kinetics of IFN-β gene expression were quite similar to those of IFN-α gene
expression in all the groups tested (Fig. 5). IFN-γ gene expression level clearly increased only in the 6KS0185- and
Czech56-infected mice on 5 and 7 dpi, respectively (Fig.
6).
Fig. 4.
IFN-α gene expression profiles in lungs of the mice infected with H4 subtype viruses.
(A) A/slaty-backed gull/Japan/6KS0185/2006 (H4N8), (B) A/red-necked
stint/Australia/1/04 (H4N8), (C) A/duck/Czechoslovakia/56 (H4N6), (D)
A/duck/Shiga/8/04 (H4N6), (E) A/duck/Osaka/1/05 (H4N8). RRT-PCR was
performed to measure IFN-α mRNA levels. The Ct values were normalized to 18S rRNA and
calculated as fold changes in relation to the mRNA obtained from uninfected normal
mice by the comparative C(T) method. The mean fold changes (closed circles) were
calculated from the results of two mice (striped bar and gray bar).
Fig. 5.
IFN-β gene expression profiles in lungs of the mice infected with H4 subtype viruses.
(A) A/slaty-backed gull/Japan/6KS0185/2006 (H4N8), (B) A/red-necked
stint/Australia/1/04 (H4N8), (C) A/duck/Czechoslovakia/56 (H4N6), (D)
A/duck/Shiga/8/04 (H4N6), (E) A/duck/Osaka/1/05 (H4N8). RRT-PCR was
performed to measure IFN-β mRNA levels. The Ct values were normalized to 18S rRNA and
calculated as fold changes in relation to the mRNA obtained from uninfected normal
mice by the comparative C(T) method. The mean fold changes (closed circles) were
calculated from the results of two mice (striped bar and gray bar).
Fig. 6.
Comparison of IFN-γ gene expression profiles in lungs of the mice infected with H4
subtype viruses. (A) A/slaty-backed gull/Japan/6KS0185/2006 (H4N8), (B) A/red-necked
stint/Australia/1/04 (H4N8), (C) A/duck/Czechoslovakia/56 (H4N6), (D)
A/duck/Shiga/8/04 (H4N6), (E) A/duck/Osaka/1/05 (H4N8). RRT-PCR was
performed to measure IFN-γ mRNA levels. The Ct values were normalized to 18S rRNA and
calculated as fold changes in relation to the mRNA obtained from uninfected normal
mice by the comparative C(T) method. The mean fold changes (closed circles) were
calculated from the results of two mice (striped bar and gray bar).
IFN-α gene expression profiles in lungs of the mice infected with H4 subtype viruses.
(A) A/slaty-backed gull/Japan/6KS0185/2006 (H4N8), (B) A/red-necked
stint/Australia/1/04 (H4N8), (C) A/duck/Czechoslovakia/56 (H4N6), (D)
A/duck/Shiga/8/04 (H4N6), (E) A/duck/Osaka/1/05 (H4N8). RRT-PCR was
performed to measure IFN-α mRNA levels. The Ct values were normalized to 18S rRNA and
calculated as fold changes in relation to the mRNA obtained from uninfected normal
mice by the comparative C(T) method. The mean fold changes (closed circles) were
calculated from the results of two mice (striped bar and gray bar).IFN-β gene expression profiles in lungs of the mice infected with H4 subtype viruses.
(A) A/slaty-backed gull/Japan/6KS0185/2006 (H4N8), (B) A/red-necked
stint/Australia/1/04 (H4N8), (C) A/duck/Czechoslovakia/56 (H4N6), (D)
A/duck/Shiga/8/04 (H4N6), (E) A/duck/Osaka/1/05 (H4N8). RRT-PCR was
performed to measure IFN-β mRNA levels. The Ct values were normalized to 18S rRNA and
calculated as fold changes in relation to the mRNA obtained from uninfected normal
mice by the comparative C(T) method. The mean fold changes (closed circles) were
calculated from the results of two mice (striped bar and gray bar).Comparison of IFN-γ gene expression profiles in lungs of the mice infected with H4
subtype viruses. (A) A/slaty-backed gull/Japan/6KS0185/2006 (H4N8), (B) A/red-necked
stint/Australia/1/04 (H4N8), (C) A/duck/Czechoslovakia/56 (H4N6), (D)
A/duck/Shiga/8/04 (H4N6), (E) A/duck/Osaka/1/05 (H4N8). RRT-PCR was
performed to measure IFN-γ mRNA levels. The Ct values were normalized to 18S rRNA and
calculated as fold changes in relation to the mRNA obtained from uninfected normal
mice by the comparative C(T) method. The mean fold changes (closed circles) were
calculated from the results of two mice (striped bar and gray bar).
DISCUSSION
In this study, lung cytokine gene expression profiles were compared between the mice
infected with 6KS0185 and those infected with Aus04 and other H4 subtype viruses. Among the
viruses, only 6KS0185 caused respiratory disease in the infected mice, although all the
viruses proliferated in the lungs of infected mice to a similar level [1].In the lungs of 6KS0185-infected mice, gene expression levels of the proinflammatory
cytokines, TNF-α and IL-6, were higher than those of the mice infected with Aus04 and other
H4 subtype viruses at most time points measured (Figs.
1 and 2). IL-6 is reportedly elevated in
patients with severe clinical symptoms of influenza and correlates with disease severity in
early stages of infection [16], suggesting that the
successive high level of IL-6 production in the lungs (Fig. 2A) of mice infected with 6KS0185 is related to the severity of respiratory
disease in these mice. Interestingly, TNF-α gene expression showed a biphasic pattern in the
mice infected with 6KS0185 (Fig. 1A). TNF-α is
known to induce cell death and further promotes other cytokine production and immune cell
migration [26]. Studies using cytokine receptor
deficient mice suggested that TNF-α contributed to morbidity during H5N1virus infection
[31]. On the other hand, TNF-α is also critical for
negative regulation of lung immunopathology during acute influenza infection [5]. The biphasic pattern of TNF-α gene expression that was
observed in this study could correlate with the accelerated inflammatory reactions in the
lungs, which in turn, proves beneficial for eventual recovery. In fact, the mice infected
with 6KS0185 developed marked body weight reduction and severe symptoms of dyspnea, but most
of these mice recovered successfully within 2 weeks post infection [1].IL-12 is primarily produced by macrophages and dendritic cells and enhances cytotoxic
activity of NK cells and T cells including CD8+ cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs). In addition,
IL-12 is an initial inducer of IFN-γ production in NK cells and T cells in response to
influenza infection [22, 35]. NK cells and CTLs activated by IL-12 are necessary to control virus
spread via direct lysis of the infected cells or by the production of cytokines, such as
IFN-γ and TNF-α, but these mechanisms may also contribute to pulmonary damage [33]. Thus, the high levels of IL-12 production may also
contribute to the severe pneumonia of mice infected with 6KS0185. On the other hand, direct
correlations between the gene expression levels of IL-12 and those of IFN-γ and TNF-α could
not be confirmed in the current study (Figs.
1, 3 and 6), suggesting a need for additional studies to clarify the
relationship between the IL-12 production and disease development in the mice infected with
6KS0185.Type I IFNs are known to inhibit viral replication [17], and numerous in vivo studies have demonstrated that
influenza virus replication is affected by type I IFNs [8]. In the mice infected with 6KS0185, virus titers in the lungs showed a biphasic
pattern, which peaked on 1 dpi and 4 or 5 dpi [1]. It
is unclear, given our data showing type I IFN production suppressed until 4 dpi in the
6KS0185-infected mice (Figs. 4A and 5A) why virus titers decline during 2 to 3 dpi, and
it deserves further investigation. On the other hand, it has been reported that TNF-α can
exert strong antiviral activity against influenza virus, and the antiviral effect could be
greater than that of type I IFNs [27]. The high
levels of IL-12 production in the 6KS0185-infected mice (Fig. 3A) might be activating NK cells and promoting the death of virus-infected
cells for viral clearance as described above, particularly at early time points. Thus, the
kinetics of virus titers in the mice infected with 6KS0185 could be affected not only by the
production of type I IFNs, but also by other host immune factors including the production of
other critical cytokines. Additional studies would further clarify the mechanism underlying
the disease development in the mice infected with 6KS0185. Nevertheless, the results
obtained in the current study suggested production of proinflammatory cytokines and
suppressed levels of type I IFN in the 6KS-0185 infected mice: thus, a correlation between
the lung cytokine production and the severity of disease in the mice infected with a low
pathogenic AIV of H4N8 subtype.6KS0185 was genetically different from Aus04 only in the PB1 and NS gene segments [1]. The differences in the PB1 and NS genes might
contribute to the differences observed in the cytokine responses induced by 6KS0185 and
Aus04. The PB1 and NS segments encode the PB1 and PB1-F2 proteins and the NS1 and NS2
proteins, respectively. It is known that a major function of NS1 is to inhibit innate
immunity by preventing type I IFN release [11, 12]. In human lung epithelial cells, the NS1 of the 1918
pandemic virus efficiently suppressed the expression of IFN-regulated genes, which was
likely to contribute to pathogenesis of the virus by controlling antiviral innate immune
responses [9]. It is also known that PB1-F2 induces
apoptosis in cells through the mitochondrial pathway [3] and inhibits the induction of type I IFNs in a different signaling cascade from
that of NS1 [32]. Although several genetic mutations
for these viral proteins that influence viral pathogenicity in the host have been reported
[4, 28, 30], these mutations could not be found in the genes of
the 6KS0185 virus [1]. The results would suggest that
other genetic mutations involved in the PB1 and NS genes of 6KS0185 might relate to the
pathogenicity of the virus. A further study using a reverse genetics system would be useful
to elucidate the actual role of viral factors involved in the pathogenesis of 6KS0185. In
addition, characterization of the types of immune cells playing a role in host immune
response by investigating bronchoalveolar lavage fluid in mice may help explain the cytokine
profiles observed in this study. Although additional studies are needed, the results
obtained in this study provide valuable information to understand the immunopathology
induced by a low pathogenic AIV, which may be useful in preparation for outbreaks of novel
influenza A virus.
Authors: J E Durbin; A Fernandez-Sesma; C K Lee; T D Rao; A B Frey; T M Moran; S Vukmanovic; A García-Sastre; D E Levy Journal: J Immunol Date: 2000-04-15 Impact factor: 5.422
Authors: W Chen; P A Calvo; D Malide; J Gibbs; U Schubert; I Bacik; S Basta; R O'Neill; J Schickli; P Palese; P Henklein; J R Bennink; J W Yewdell Journal: Nat Med Date: 2001-12 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Gary K Geiss; Mirella Salvatore; Terrence M Tumpey; Victoria S Carter; Xiuyan Wang; Christopher F Basler; Jeffery K Taubenberger; Roger E Bumgarner; Peter Palese; Michael G Katze; Adolfo García-Sastre Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2002-07-29 Impact factor: 11.205