BACKGROUND:Obese adolescents are at risk for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Obesity interventions delivered through media, such as the web and text messages [short message service (SMS)] may be beneficial when targeting obese adolescents.. METHODS: A randomized controlled trial, Pace-Internet for Diabetes Prevention Intervention (PACEi-DP), compared three forms of an obesity intervention to usual care (UC): (a) website only (W); (b) website, monthly group sessions, and follow-up calls (WG); and (c) website and SMS (WSMS). Participants were overweight or obese adolescents at risk for T2DM (n = 101; age 12-16 years; mean body mass index (BMI) percentile = 97.6; 74.3% Hispanic). In addition to the website, WSMS participants received SMS supporting intervention goals and behavioral strategies and communicated via SMS with a case manager. WG participants had additional group activities related to weight loss and received follow-up calls from a health coach. UC participants were given printed materials and encouraged to attend three initial group sessions. Repeated measures mixed model regression analyses tested treatment effects for anthropometric, behavioral, and behavioral change strategy outcomes. RESULTS: There were no treatment effects for BMI, adiposity, physical activity, or diet at 12 months. Treatment effects were observed for sedentary behavior, with the W arm having a greater decrease in sedentary behavior (4.9 to 2.8 h/day) than the UC arm (p = .006). CONCLUSION: Although not sufficient to produce weight loss, the combination of web intervention and group sessions with telephone follow-up yielded improvements in sedentary behavior and in the use of behavior change strategies expected to lead to behavior change.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND:Obese adolescents are at risk for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Obesity interventions delivered through media, such as the web and text messages [short message service (SMS)] may be beneficial when targeting obese adolescents.. METHODS: A randomized controlled trial, Pace-Internet for Diabetes Prevention Intervention (PACEi-DP), compared three forms of an obesity intervention to usual care (UC): (a) website only (W); (b) website, monthly group sessions, and follow-up calls (WG); and (c) website and SMS (WSMS). Participants were overweight or obese adolescents at risk for T2DM (n = 101; age 12-16 years; mean body mass index (BMI) percentile = 97.6; 74.3% Hispanic). In addition to the website, WSMS participants received SMS supporting intervention goals and behavioral strategies and communicated via SMS with a case manager. WG participants had additional group activities related to weight loss and received follow-up calls from a health coach. UC participants were given printed materials and encouraged to attend three initial group sessions. Repeated measures mixed model regression analyses tested treatment effects for anthropometric, behavioral, and behavioral change strategy outcomes. RESULTS: There were no treatment effects for BMI, adiposity, physical activity, or diet at 12 months. Treatment effects were observed for sedentary behavior, with the W arm having a greater decrease in sedentary behavior (4.9 to 2.8 h/day) than the UC arm (p = .006). CONCLUSION: Although not sufficient to produce weight loss, the combination of web intervention and group sessions with telephone follow-up yielded improvements in sedentary behavior and in the use of behavior change strategies expected to lead to behavior change.
Authors: Binh Nguyen; Vanessa A Shrewsbury; Janice O'Connor; Katharine S Steinbeck; Anthea Lee; Andrew J Hill; Smita Shah; Michael R Kohn; Siranda Torvaldsen; Louise A Baur Journal: Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med Date: 2012-02
Authors: Shelagh A Mulvaney; Shilo Anders; Annie K Smith; Eric J Pittel; Kevin B Johnson Journal: J Telemed Telecare Date: 2012-03 Impact factor: 6.184
Authors: R J Kuczmarski; C L Ogden; L M Grummer-Strawn; K M Flegal; S S Guo; R Wei; Z Mei; L R Curtin; A F Roche; C L Johnson Journal: Adv Data Date: 2000-06-08
Authors: Margaret Grey; Sarah S Jaser; Marita G Holl; Vanessa Jefferson; James Dziura; Veronika Northrup Journal: Prev Med Date: 2009-07-28 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: Dawn K Wilson; Heather Kitzman-Ulrich; Ken Resnicow; M Lee Van Horn; Sara M St George; E Rebekah Siceloff; Kassandra A Alia; Tyler McDaniel; VaShawn Heatley; Lauren Huffman; Sandra Coulon; Ron Prinz Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2015-03-30 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Julia K Kolodziejczyk; Kyle Gutzmer; Shana M Wright; Elva M Arredondo; Linda Hill; Kevin Patrick; Jeannie S Huang; Michael Gottschalk; Gregory J Norman Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2014-07-01 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Sara Belle Donevant; Robin Dawson Estrada; Joan Marie Culley; Brian Habing; Swann Arp Adams Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2018-10-01 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: David A Fedele; Christopher C Cushing; Alyssa Fritz; Christina M Amaro; Adrian Ortega Journal: JAMA Pediatr Date: 2017-05-01 Impact factor: 16.193