Literature DB >> 23759009

'Trifecta' after radical prostatectomy: is there a standard definition?

Leonardo D Borregales1, William T Berg, Oded Tal, Chris Wambi, Sarah Kaufman, Jose M Gaya, Cristian Urzúa, Ketan K Badani.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine the extent of variability in the definitions of the 'trifecta' after radical prostatectomy (undetectable PSA, urinary continence and potency) to be found in the literature. To establish a consensus definition of the trifecta in an effort to standardize criteria and reporting.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic review of published articles found in the PubMed database for the period from January 2003 to March 2012 was performed. The search queries included the keywords 'radical prostatectomy,' 'prostatectomy outcome,' and 'trifecta'.
RESULTS: A total of 86 publications were identified of which 14 were used for analysis. Eight different definitions of biochemical recurrence were reported, the most common definition being PSA ≥0.2 ng/mL. The definition of potency was the most variable. Ten different definitions of potency were found, with the most common being 'having erections sufficient for intercourse with or without a phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor'. Nine different definitions of continence were found. The most common definition of continence was 'wearing no pads'. Only six of the 14 articles used validated questionnaires in their outcome measures.
CONCLUSIONS: The definitions of trifecta reported in the literature are highly variable. We propose the following consensus definition based on our analysis: (1) PSA >0.2 ng/mL with confirmatory value; (2) attainment of erections sufficient for intercourse with or without oral pharmacological agents; (3) wearing zero pads. This consensus definition should be considered when designing studies and reporting outcomes of radical prostatectomy.
© 2013 BJU International.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23759009     DOI: 10.1111/bju.12002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  9 in total

1.  Healthcare utilization in men with poorer sexual and urinary function recovery following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Peter A Elliott; George A Abdelsayed; Patrick S Kilday; Brian J Kim; Jeff M Slezak; Gary W Chien
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2017-10-30       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 2.  Robotic Surgical System for Radical Prostatectomy: A Health Technology Assessment.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2017-07-07

Review 3.  Prevalence of post-prostatectomy erectile dysfunction and a review of the recommended therapeutic modalities.

Authors:  Thiago Fernandes Negris Lima; Joshua Bitran; Fabio Stefano Frech; Ranjith Ramasamy
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2020-11-17       Impact factor: 2.896

4.  Effects of Progressive Resistance Training on Post-Surgery Incontinence in Men with Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Juhyun Park; Dong Hyun Yoon; Sangjun Yoo; Sung Yong Cho; Min Chul Cho; Ga-Young Han; Wook Song; Hyeon Jeong
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 4.241

5.  Validated Prospective Assessment of Quality of Life After Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy: Beyond Continence and Erections.

Authors:  Simone Albisinni; Fouad Aoun; Thierry Quackels; Grégoire Assenmacher; Alexandre Peltier; Roland van Velthoven; Thierry Roumeguère
Journal:  Am J Mens Health       Date:  2019 May-Jun

6.  Radical Nephroureterectomy Tetrafecta: A Proposal Reporting Surgical Strategy Quality at Surgery.

Authors:  Francesco Soria; B Pradere; R Hurle; D D'Andrea; S Albisinni; R Diamand; E Laukhtina; E Di Trapani; A Aziz; W Krajewski; J Y Teoh; A Mari; M Moschini; F Chiancone; R Autorino; A Porreca; M Marchioni; G Liguori; G Lucarelli; G M Busetto; N Foschi; A Antonelli; P Bove; G I Russo; N Crisan; M Borghesi; L Boeri; A Veccia; F Greco; N Longo; O De Cobelli; S F Shariat; P Gontero; M Ferro
Journal:  Eur Urol Open Sci       Date:  2022-06-13

7.  Development and internal validation of preoperative and postoperative nomograms predicting quadrifecta outcomes following robotic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Gopal Sharma; Danny Darlington; Puneet Ahluwalia; Gagan Gautam
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2022-07-01

8.  Laparoscopic versus open radical prostatectomy in high prostate volume cases: impact on oncological and functional results.

Authors:  Sciarra Alessandro; Gentilucci Alessandro; Cattarino Susanna; Innocenzi Michele; Di Quilio Francesca; Fasulo Andrea; Magnus Von Heland; Gentile Vincenzo; Salciccia Stefano
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.541

9.  Prospective evaluation of urinary continence after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy using a validated questionnaire and daily pad use assessment: which definition is more relevant to the patient's perception of recovery?

Authors:  Akram Assem; Seif M Hamdy; Ahmad M Beltagy; Ali Serdar Gӧzen; Tamer Abou Youssif
Journal:  Cent European J Urol       Date:  2021-04-21
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.