| Literature DB >> 23758999 |
Xin Zhan1, Ji Wu, Zhiqiang Chen, Bruce J Hinds.
Abstract
Carbon nanotube (CEntities:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23758999 PMCID: PMC3716546 DOI: 10.1186/1556-276X-8-279
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanoscale Res Lett ISSN: 1556-276X Impact factor: 4.703
Figure 1TEM and SEM images of DWCNT and schematic diagram of functionalized anionic dye. (A) TEM image of DWCNTs (purchased from Sigma-Aldrich). (B) SEM image of as-made DWCNT membrane in the cross-sectional view. (C) Schematic diagram of functionalized anionic dye on the CNT tip playing as gatekeeper (gray, C; red, O; blue, N; yellow, S).
Figure 2Schematic illustration of two-step functionalization. (A) Electrochemical grafting or chemical grafting of 4-carboxyl phenyl diazonium. (B) Carbodiimide coupling of Direct Blue 71 dye.
Figure 3Schematic mechanism and illustration. (A) Schematic mechanism of electrochemical oxidation of primary amine on conductive surface. (B) Schematic illustration of one-step functionalization of Direct Blue 71 dye via electrooxidation of amine.
Figure 4Schematic mechanism of ionic rectification on DWCNT-dye membrane (A, B). Gray, C; blue, N; red, O; yellow, S; light green, Fe(CN)63−; dark green, K+.
Figure 5Nyquist plots of dye-modified membrane in (a) 20 mM KCl (b) 100 mM KCl.
Summary of ionic rectification factor on single-step modified DWCNT-dye membrane
| 10 | 7.2 ± 0.3 | 3.1 ± 0.3 | 2.4 ± 0.2 |
| 50 | 6.4 ± 1 | 2.0 ± 0.1 | 2.0 ± 0.1 |
| 100 | 5.6 ± 1 | 2.3 ± 0.1 | 1.7 ± 0.1 |
Rectification factor was calculated by the ratio of ionic transport current at ±0.6-V bias. Linear scan was from −0.60 to +0.60 V with the scan rate at 50 mV/s.
Figure 6Ionic rectification curves on (A) as-made and (B) modified DWCNT membranes with potassium ferricyanide.
Comparison of ionic current rectification factor in KFe(CN)solution
| 10 | 3.9 ± 0.8 | 14.4 ± 0.6 | 2.9 ± 0.2 | 4.0 ± 0.4 |
| 50 | 4.4 ± 0.9 | 9.8 ± 0.3 | 2.9 ± 0.2 | 3.3 ± 0.07 |
| 100 | 3.4 ± 0.1 | 8.0 ± 0.4 | 3.2 ± 0.3 | 3.6 ± 0.2 |
Rectification factor was calculated by the ratio of ionic transport current at ±0.6-V bias. Linear scan was from −0.60 to + 0.60 V with the scan rate at 50 mV/s.
Summary of ionic rectification factor on DWCNT membrane after water plasma oxidation to remove gatekeepers
| 10 | 3.2 ± 0.3 | 1.7 ± 0.2 | 2.4 ± 0.2 |
| 50 | 2.8 ± 0.3 | 1.5 ± 0.07 | 2.0 ± 0.2 |
| 100 | 2.4 ± 0.2 | 1.4 ± 0.0.02 | 2.0 ± 0.2 |
Figure 7Schematic illustration of dye assay quantification. (A) Quantification of carboxylic density on glassy carbon by pH-dependent adsorption/desorption. (B) Quantification of sulfonate density by ionic screening effect. (assumed charge/dye = 1:1).
Figure 8Quantification of sulfonate density as a function of grafting time using dye assay.
Quantification of carboxyl and sulfonate density using dye assay
| | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Step 1 in two-step functionalization | Electrochemical grafting of 4-carboxyl phenyl diazonium for 8 min | 1.3 × 1015 | 1.3 × 1015 | - |
| Step 2 in two-step functionalization | Carbodiimide coupling of dye | 2.0 × 1015 | 1.07 × 1015 | 0.93 × 1015 |
| One-step functionalization | Electrochemical grafting of dye by amine oxidation for 8 min | 0.9 × 1015 | - | 0.9 × 1015 |