Literature DB >> 23758582

Breast reconstruction national trends and healthcare implications.

Tina Hernandez-Boussard1, Kamakshi Zeidler, Ario Barzin, Gordon Lee, Catherine Curtin.   

Abstract

Breast reconstruction improves quality-of-life of breast cancer patients. Different reconstructive options exist, yet commentary in the plastic surgery literature suggests that financial constraints are limiting access to autologous reconstruction (AR). This study follows national trends in breast reconstruction and identifies factors associated with reconstructive choices. Data were obtained from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample from 1998 to 2008. Patients were categorized as having either implant or ARs. Bivariate and multivariate regression analysis identified variables associated with receiving implants versus AR. Physician fee schedules were analyzed using national average Medicare physician reimbursement rates. From 1998 to 2008, 324,134 breast reconstructions were performed. Reconstructions increased 4% per year. The proportion of implant reconstructions increased 11% per year, whereasARs decreased 5% per year (p < 0.05). Our model showed that the odds of having implant-based versus AR were significantly associated with age, disease severity, payer type, hospital teaching status, and year of surgery. Year of surgery was the strongest predictor of implant reconstruction; patients receiving breast reconstructive surgery in 2009 were three times more likely to have implant breast reconstructive surgery compared with similar patients in 2002. Medicare reimbursement steadily declined for AR over a similar time frame. From 1998 to 2008, autologous breast reconstruction has significantly declined, parallel to a decrease in physician reimbursement. Our data found no significant change in patient characteristics supporting the lack of choice of AR. Further research is warranted to better understand this shift to implant reconstruction and to ensure future access of these complex reconstructive procedures.
© 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  breast cancer; breast reconstruction; nationwide inpatient sample; reimbursement

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23758582     DOI: 10.1111/tbj.12148

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast J        ISSN: 1075-122X            Impact factor:   2.431


  16 in total

1.  Nipple-sparing mastectomy in patients with BRCA1/2 mutations and variants of uncertain significance.

Authors:  A T Manning; C Wood; A Eaton; M Stempel; D Capko; A Pusic; M Morrow; V Sacchini
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  Health insurance coverage and racial disparities in breast reconstruction after mastectomy.

Authors:  Tetyana P Shippee; Katy B Kozhimannil; Kathleen Rowan; Beth A Virnig
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2014 May-Jun

3.  Association of Medicaid Expansion with Post-mastectomy Reconstruction Rates.

Authors:  Justin Le Blanc; Mehra Golshan; Donald Lannin; Rachel Greenup; Elizabeth R Berger; Angeleke Saridakis; Nina Horowitz; Gregory Zanieski; Tomer Avraham; Melissa Mastrioanni; Tristen Park
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-02-06       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  Influencers of Immediate Postmastectomy Reconstruction: A National Cancer Database Analysis.

Authors:  Dora Danko; Yuan Liu; Feifei Geng; Theresa W Gillespie
Journal:  Aesthet Surg J       Date:  2022-04-12       Impact factor: 4.283

5.  Toward Drainless Breast Reconstruction: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Harsh Patel; David Kulber; Edward Ray
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2022-10-17

Review 6.  The role of the physiotherapy in the plastic surgery patients after oncological breast surgery.

Authors:  Luiz Felipe Nevola Teixeira; Fabio Sandrin
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2014-02

7.  Temporal Trends in Postmastectomy Radiation Therapy and Breast Reconstruction Associated With Changes in National Comprehensive Cancer Network Guidelines.

Authors:  Lane L Frasier; Sara Holden; Timothy Holden; Jessica R Schumacher; Glen Leverson; Bethany Anderson; Caprice C Greenberg; Heather B Neuman
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 31.777

8.  Impact of Physician Payments on Microvascular Breast Reconstruction: An All-Payer Claim Database Analysis.

Authors:  Hina Panchal; Meghana G Shamsunder; Avraham Sheinin; Clifford C Sheckter; Nicholas L Berlin; Jonas A Nelson; Robert Allen; David Rubin; Jeffrey H Kozlow; Evan Matros
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 5.169

9.  Trends in Immediate Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  Daniel R Leff; Alex Bottle; Erik Mayer; Darren K Patten; Christopher Rao; Paul Aylin; Dimitri J Hadjiminas; Thanos Athanasiou; Ara Darzi; Gerald Gui
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2015-09-04

10.  A comparative analysis of 2 national breast reconstruction surveys: concerns regarding autologous and microsurgical breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Raffi Gurunluoglu; Michael Bronsert
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2014-06-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.