Literature DB >> 23758532

Demographic connectivity for ursid populations at wildlife crossing structures in Banff National Park.

Michael A Sawaya1, Anthony P Clevenger, Steven T Kalinowski.   

Abstract

Wildlife crossing structures are one solution to mitigating the fragmentation of wildlife populations caused by roads, but their effectiveness in providing connectivity has only been superficially evaluated. Hundreds of grizzly (Ursus arctos) and black bear (Ursus americanus) passages through under and overpasses have been recorded in Banff National Park, Alberta, Canada. However, the ability of crossing structures to allow individual and population-level movements across road networks remains unknown. In April 2006, we initiated a 3-year investigation into whether crossing structures provide demographic connectivity for grizzly and black bears in Banff National Park. We collected hair with multiple noninvasive methods to obtain genetic samples from grizzly and black bears around the Bow Valley. Our objectives were to determine the number of male and female grizzly and black bears that use crossing structures; examine spatial and temporal patterns of crossings; and estimate the proportions of grizzly and black bear populations in the Bow Valley that use crossing structures. Fifteen grizzly (7 female, 8 male) and 17 black bears (8 female, 9 male) used wildlife crossing structures. The number of individuals detected at wildlife crossing structures was highly correlated with the number of passages in space and time. Grizzly bears used open crossing structures (e.g., overpasses) more often than constricted crossings (e.g., culverts). Peak use of crossing structures for both bear species occurred in July, when high rates of foraging activity coincide with mating season. We compared the number of bears that used crossings with estimates of population abundance from a related study and determined that substantial percentages of grizzly (15.0% in 2006, 19.8% in 2008) and black bear (17.6% in 2006, 11.0% in 2008) populations used crossing structures. On the basis of our results, we concluded wildlife crossing structures provide demographic connectivity for bear populations in Banff National Park.
© 2013 Society for Conservation Biology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ursus americanus; Ursus arctos; caminos; conectividad; connectivity; estructuras para el cruce de vida silvestre; fragmentación; fragmentation; muestreo genético no invasivo; noninvasive genetic sampling; poblaciones; populations; roads; wildlife crossing structures

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23758532     DOI: 10.1111/cobi.12075

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Conserv Biol        ISSN: 0888-8892            Impact factor:   6.560


  4 in total

1.  Genetic connectivity for two bear species at wildlife crossing structures in Banff National Park.

Authors:  Michael A Sawaya; Steven T Kalinowski; Anthony P Clevenger
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Stable isotopes reveal rail-associated behavior in a threatened carnivore.

Authors:  John B Hopkins; Jesse Whittington; Anthony P Clevenger; Michael A Sawaya; Colleen Cassady St Clair
Journal:  Isotopes Environ Health Stud       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 1.675

3.  Modeling connectivity to identify current and future anthropogenic barriers to movement of large carnivores: A case study in the American Southwest.

Authors:  Meredith L McClure; Brett G Dickson; Kerry L Nicholson
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 2.912

4.  A Comparison of Grizzly Bear Demographic Parameters Estimated from Non-Spatial and Spatial Open Population Capture-Recapture Models.

Authors:  Jesse Whittington; Michael A Sawaya
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-31       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.