PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: This study set out to examine the sensitivity of verbal fluency component scores in severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). RESEARCH DESIGN: A retrospective cross-sectional design was used, with control participants chosen at random from the community and TBI patients from litigation cases. METHODS AND PROCEDURES: Fifty-four healthy controls and 28 patients who had incurred a severe TBI were included in the study. The Controlled Oral Word Association test was rescored to include clustering and switching scores for phonemic and semantic fluency separately. The scores were compared between controls and TBI patients using independent samples t-tests. MAIN OUTCOMES AND RESULTS: The findings demonstrate that component scores for semantic fluency yielded the largest effect sizes overall (d = 1.32 and d = 1.53), but not phonemic fluency. Total words generated in phonemic fluency yielded the largest effect size, although still modest (d = 0.62). CONCLUSIONS: While verbal fluency may be a useful test tool to elicit evidence of neuropsychological impairment after TBI, these findings are consistent with previous research demonstrating that component scores are more sensitive indices. There is potential clinical utility in using component scores for examining the specific severity of verbal fluency impairment in TBI and guiding rehabilitation efforts.
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: This study set out to examine the sensitivity of verbal fluency component scores in severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). RESEARCH DESIGN: A retrospective cross-sectional design was used, with control participants chosen at random from the community and TBIpatients from litigation cases. METHODS AND PROCEDURES: Fifty-four healthy controls and 28 patients who had incurred a severe TBI were included in the study. The Controlled Oral Word Association test was rescored to include clustering and switching scores for phonemic and semantic fluency separately. The scores were compared between controls and TBIpatients using independent samples t-tests. MAIN OUTCOMES AND RESULTS: The findings demonstrate that component scores for semantic fluency yielded the largest effect sizes overall (d = 1.32 and d = 1.53), but not phonemic fluency. Total words generated in phonemic fluency yielded the largest effect size, although still modest (d = 0.62). CONCLUSIONS: While verbal fluency may be a useful test tool to elicit evidence of neuropsychological impairment after TBI, these findings are consistent with previous research demonstrating that component scores are more sensitive indices. There is potential clinical utility in using component scores for examining the specific severity of verbal fluency impairment in TBI and guiding rehabilitation efforts.