Literature DB >> 23758191

Application of the Gibbs equation to the adsorption of nonionic surfactants and polymers at the air-water interface: comparison with surface excesses determined directly using neutron reflectivity.

Pei Xun Li1, Zhi Xin Li, Hsin-Hui Shen, Robert K Thomas, Jeffrey Penfold, Jian Ren Lu.   

Abstract

Four recent papers by Menger et al. have questioned methods of analysis of surface tension (ST) data that use the Gibbs equation to obtain the surface excess (Γ) of a surfactant at the air-water interface. There have been two responses which challenge the assertions of Menger et al. and a response from Menger et al. We use directly determined values of Γ from a range of neutron reflectometry (NR) data to examine some of the issues that are relevant to these seven papers. We show that there is excellent agreement between NR measurements and careful ST analyses for a wide range of nonionic adsorbents, including surfactants and polymers. The reason it is possible to obtain good agreement near the critical micelle concentration (CMC) is that nonionic surfactants generally seem to saturate the surface before the CMC is reached and this makes it relatively easy to determine the limiting slope (and hence Γ) of the ST-log(concentration) plot at the CMC. Furthermore, there is also generally good agreement between ST and NR over the whole range of concentrations below the CMC until depletion effects become important. Depletion effects are shown to become important at higher concentrations than expected, which brings them into the range of many experiments, including techniques other than ST and NR. This is illustrated with new measurements on the biosurfactant surfactin. The agreement between ST and NR outside the depletion range can be regarded as a mutual validation of the two methods, especially as it is demonstrated independently of any model adsorption isotherms. In the normal experimental situation NR is less vulnerable to depletion than ST and we show how NR and a single ST measurement can be used to determine the hitherto undetermined CMC of the nonionic surfactant C18E12, which is found to be 1.3 × 10(-6) M.

Entities:  

Year:  2013        PMID: 23758191     DOI: 10.1021/la4018344

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Langmuir        ISSN: 0743-7463            Impact factor:   3.882


  6 in total

Review 1.  Micro-Surface and -Interfacial Tensions Measured Using the Micropipette Technique: Applications in Ultrasound-Microbubbles, Oil-Recovery, Lung-Surfactants, Nanoprecipitation, and Microfluidics.

Authors:  David Needham; Koji Kinoshita; Anders Utoft
Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 2.891

2.  Dynamic surface tension and adsorption mechanism of surfactin biosurfactant at the air-water interface.

Authors:  Sagheer A Onaizi
Journal:  Eur Biophys J       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 1.733

3.  Self-assembly of a surfactin nanolayer at solid-liquid and air-liquid interfaces.

Authors:  Sagheer A Onaizi; M S Nasser; Nasir M A Al-Lagtah
Journal:  Eur Biophys J       Date:  2015-12-09       Impact factor: 1.733

4.  Measuring protein insertion areas in lipid monolayers by fluorescence correlation spectroscopy.

Authors:  Jan Auerswald; Jan Ebenhan; Christian Schwieger; Andrea Scrima; Annette Meister; Kirsten Bacia
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2021-02-18       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Composition of Surface Layer at the Water-Air Interface and Micelles of Triton X-100 + Rhamnolipid Mixtures.

Authors:  Diana Mańko; Anna Zdziennicka; Bronisław Jańczuk
Journal:  J Solution Chem       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 1.677

6.  Benchmarking the Self-Assembly of Surfactin Biosurfactant at the Liquid-Air Interface to those of Synthetic Surfactants.

Authors:  Sagheer A Onaizi; M S Nasser; Nasir M A Al-Lagtah
Journal:  J Surfactants Deterg       Date:  2016-02-27       Impact factor: 1.902

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.