Literature DB >> 23756708

Binary outcomes are not better than continuous variables in randomized controlled trials.

Jan Kottner1, David L Streiner2.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2013        PMID： 23756708     DOI： 10.1038/jid.2013.256

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Invest Dermatol        ISSN： 0022-202X            Impact factor:   8.551


× No keyword cloud information.
  6 in total

1.  Breaking up is hard to do: the heartbreak of dichotomizing continuous data.

Authors:  David L Streiner
Journal:  Can J Psychiatry       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 4.356

Review 2.  Sample sizes for clinical trials with normal data.

Authors:  Steven A Julious
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2004-06-30       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  What's under the ROC? An introduction to receiver operating characteristics curves.

Authors:  David L Streiner; John Cairney
Journal:  Can J Psychiatry       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 4.356

Review 4.  Typology of the primary outcome construction in dermatology: a systematic review of published randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Dany Nassar; Emilie Sbidian; Sylvie Bastuji-Garin; Ludovic Martin; Alain Dupuy
Journal:  J Invest Dermatol       Date:  2012-08-30       Impact factor: 8.551

5.  Translating the science of quality of life into practice: What do dermatology life quality index scores mean?

Authors:  Yan Hongbo; Charles L Thomas; Michael A Harrison; M Sam Salek; Andrew Y Finlay
Journal:  J Invest Dermatol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 8.551

6.  Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI)--a simple practical measure for routine clinical use.

Authors:  A Y Finlay; G K Khan
Journal:  Clin Exp Dermatol       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 3.470
  6 in total
  1 in total

1.  Dichotomization of primary outcomes serves external validity.

Authors:  Alain Dupuy; Dany Nassar
Journal:  J Invest Dermatol       Date:  2013-06-11       Impact factor: 8.551
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.