STUDY QUESTION: What are the attitudes towards different aspects of embryo donation among Swedish infertile couples who have surplus cryopreserved embryos? SUMMARY ANSWER: Nearly three-quarters of infertile couples with surplus embryos were in favour of embryo donation. A majority of respondents were also in favour of embryos being donated for research. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Currently, embryo donation to other infertile couples is prohibited by law in Sweden. Encouraging results have been published from countries allowing embryo donation, although it is a complex procedure associated with many emotional, ethical, legal and psychosocial aspects. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This cross-sectional study included 471 infertile couples (942 patients) treated during the period March 2006 to March 2009. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Infertile couples who had been treated at a Swedish university-based hospital and private IVF clinic and who had cryopreserved embryos were sent questionnaires with questions regarding socio-demographic data and their attitudes towards embryo donation. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: The response rate to the questionnaire was 58%. Of the respondents, 76% supported the donation of surplus embryos to other infertile couples, but there were divided opinions regarding the disclosure of the genetic parents' identities. Close to 60% of the participants indicated that donations of embryos should be allowed for research and about 45% of the participants approved donations of embryos to single women. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The relatively low response rate and the hypothetical nature of the questions may limit the validity of the results. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: The results from the study indicate that cryopreserved embryos may be available for donation to other infertile couples, particularly where restrictions can be set on recipient characteristics.
STUDY QUESTION: What are the attitudes towards different aspects of embryo donation among Swedish infertile couples who have surplus cryopreserved embryos? SUMMARY ANSWER: Nearly three-quarters of infertile couples with surplus embryos were in favour of embryo donation. A majority of respondents were also in favour of embryos being donated for research. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Currently, embryo donation to other infertile couples is prohibited by law in Sweden. Encouraging results have been published from countries allowing embryo donation, although it is a complex procedure associated with many emotional, ethical, legal and psychosocial aspects. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This cross-sectional study included 471 infertile couples (942 patients) treated during the period March 2006 to March 2009. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Infertile couples who had been treated at a Swedish university-based hospital and private IVF clinic and who had cryopreserved embryos were sent questionnaires with questions regarding socio-demographic data and their attitudes towards embryo donation. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: The response rate to the questionnaire was 58%. Of the respondents, 76% supported the donation of surplus embryos to other infertile couples, but there were divided opinions regarding the disclosure of the genetic parents' identities. Close to 60% of the participants indicated that donations of embryos should be allowed for research and about 45% of the participants approved donations of embryos to single women. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The relatively low response rate and the hypothetical nature of the questions may limit the validity of the results. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: The results from the study indicate that cryopreserved embryos may be available for donation to other infertile couples, particularly where restrictions can be set on recipient characteristics.
Entities:
Keywords:
attitudes; cryopreserved embryos; embryo donation; infertile; research
Authors: Alison E Zimon; Donald S Shepard; Jeffrey Prottas; Kristin L Rooney; Jeanie Ungerleider; Yara A Halasa-Rappel; Denny Sakkas; Selwyn P Oskowitz Journal: PLoS One Date: 2019-08-15 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Aviad Raz; Jonia Amer-Alshiek; Mor Goren-Margalit; Gal Jacobi; Alyssa Hochberg; Ami Amit; Foad Azem; Hadar Amir Journal: Isr J Health Policy Res Date: 2016-11-05
Authors: Carlos Wilson Dala Paula Abreu Abreu; Maria Lúcia Andrade Abreu; Maria Mariana Andrade Abreu; João Pedro Andrade Abreu; Luiz Fernando Cal Silva; Ines Katerina Damasceno Cavallo Cruzeiro; Rui Manuel Lopes Nunes Journal: JBRA Assist Reprod Date: 2021-04-27