Literature DB >> 23756541

Towards physiological ankle movements with the ActiGait implantable drop foot stimulator in chronic stroke.

Jennifer Ernst1, Jessica Grundey, Manuel Hewitt, Friederike von Lewinski, Jürgen Kaus, Thomas Schmalz, Veit Rohde, David Liebetanz.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Functional electrical stimulation represents an alternative to conventional and passive ankle foot orthosis (AFO) for the treatment of stroke-related drop foot. We evaluated the implantable 4-channel stimulator ActiGait, which selectively and directly stimulates the peroneal nerve. In addition, it bypasses the need for surface electrodes and cables.
METHODS: Walking speed (10-meter gait test, [m/s]) and walking endurance (6-minute gait test [m/6min]) of 5 patients were tested prior to, as well as 6 and 12 weeks after, the implantation of the ActiGait implantable drop foot stimulator system. In addition, ankle joint angles were assessed during specific phases of the gait cycle, i.e. initiation angle (IA) at the first contact of the foot to the floor, initial plantar flexion (IPF), dorsiflexion (DF) and final plantar flexion (FPF) in [°] during stance phase. The ankle joint angles were measured at baseline and 12 weeks after ActiGait implantation.
RESULTS: At the first follow-up, patients' gait speed was found to have increased (0.55; 0.77 m/s) as had walking endurance (211; 260 m). Improvement in gait speed (0.55; 0.77 m/s) and endurance (214; 248 m) was still present after 12 weeks. In addition, gait analysis after 12 weeks revealed a nearly normal physiological initiation angle (113° vs 122°) and an increase in the initial plantar flexion (7° vs. 0°). The initiation angle (IA) represents a well-suited parameter for adequate pre-positioning of the foot at the beginning of the stance phase and is necessary to prevent stumbling and falling. Furthermore, IA is identical to the maximum achieved dorsiflexion during the swing phase of gait. Thus, analysis of the IA of subjects walking with the implantable drop foot stimulator systems ActiGait is particularly useful in showing that the implantable system restores the IA towards physiological ankle movements.
CONCLUSION: The ActiGait system increased gait speed, walking endurance and the physiology of important ankle joint kinematics. This is most likely a result of ankle dorsiflexion by active peroneal stimulation during the swing phase of gait and optimized prepositioning (IA) of the foot at the beginning of stance phase. The ActiGait system represents a therapeutic option for the treatment of patients suffering drop foot due to a cerebrovascular insult.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23756541     DOI: 10.3233/RNN-120283

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci        ISSN: 0922-6028            Impact factor:   2.406


  10 in total

1.  [Functional electrostimulation for drop foot treatment : Clinical outcome].

Authors:  D Yao; E Jakubowitz; S Ettinger; L Claassen; C Plaass; C Stukenborg-Colsman; K Daniilidis
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  [Foot drop treatment by implantation of a neuroprosthesis (ActiGait®)].

Authors:  D Yao; E Jakubowitz; S Ettinger; C Plaass; C Stukenborg-Colsman; K Daniilidis
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2017-05-04       Impact factor: 1.154

3.  Motor neuroprosthesis for promoting recovery of function after stroke.

Authors:  Luciana A Mendes; Illia Ndf Lima; Tulio Souza; George C do Nascimento; Vanessa R Resqueti; Guilherme Af Fregonezi
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-01-14

4.  Chronic traumatic ankle and foot osteomyelitis: a nationwide case-control study.

Authors:  Maryam Hosseini; Mostafa Allami; Mohammadreza Soroush; Fateme Babaha; Javad Minooeefar; Davood Rahimpoor
Journal:  Mil Med Res       Date:  2018-05-15

5.  Long-term outcomes of semi-implantable functional electrical stimulation for central drop foot.

Authors:  Lars Buentjen; Andreas Kupsch; Imke Galazky; Roman Frantsev; Hans-Jochen Heinze; Jürgen Voges; Janet Hausmann; Catherine M Sweeney-Reed
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2019-06-11       Impact factor: 4.262

6.  The long-term effects of an implantable drop foot stimulator on gait in hemiparetic patients.

Authors:  Agnes Sturma; Othmar Schuhfried; Timothy Hasenoehrl; Clemens Ambrozy; Stefan Salminger; Laura A Hruby; Johannes A Mayer; Kirsten Götz-Neumann; Richard Crevenna; Michaela M Pinter; Oskar C Aszmann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-04-17       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Long-term use of implanted peroneal functional electrical stimulation for stroke-affected gait: the effects on muscle and motor nerve.

Authors:  Frank Berenpas; Vivian Weerdesteyn; Alexander C Geurts; Nens van Alfen
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2019-07-10       Impact factor: 4.262

Review 8.  The Effect of Implanted Functional Electrical Stimulation on Gait Performance in Stroke Survivors: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Gu Eon Kang; Rebecca Frederick; Brandon Nunley; Lawrence Lavery; Yasin Dhaher; Bijan Najafi; Stuart Cogan
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-13       Impact factor: 3.576

9.  Implanted Peroneal Nerve Stimulator Treatment for Drop Foot Caused by Central Nervous System Lesion: A Twelve-Month Follow-up of 21 Patients.

Authors:  Kaare Severinsen; Kurt Grey; Anne Haase Juhl; Preben Soerensen; Lorenz Oppel; Ib Magnussen; Birgit Tine Larsen
Journal:  J Rehabil Med       Date:  2022-06-20       Impact factor: 3.959

10.  Functional electrical stimulation through direct 4-channel nerve stimulation to improve gait in multiple sclerosis: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Janet Hausmann; Catherine M Sweeney-Reed; Uwe Sobieray; Mike Matzke; Hans-Jochen Heinze; Jürgen Voges; Lars Buentjen
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2015-11-14       Impact factor: 4.262

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.