Literature DB >> 23756339

A 14-year experience with blunt thoracic aortic injury.

Jennifer Watson1, Jeffrey Slaiby, Manuel Garcia Toca, Edward J Marcaccio, Tze Tec Chong.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study reviewed the natural history of blunt thoracic aortic trauma (BTAT) over a 14-year period at our level 1 trauma center and compared open vs endovascular treatment.
METHODS: All patients with BTAT presenting to a level 1 trauma center from 1998 to 2011 were included in a retrospective analysis. Multiple data points and short-term and midterm outcomes were ascertained through a retrospective record review.
RESULTS: We identified 129 patients with BTAT. Of these, 32 (25%) were dead on arrival, 38 (29%) underwent a resuscitative thoracotomy and died, 33 (26%) underwent open repair, 14 (11%) underwent endovascular repair, 9 (7%) underwent simultaneous procedures, and 3 (2%) were managed nonoperatively. Mean Injury Severity Scores and Revised Trauma Scores were similar (P = .484, P = .551) between the open repair group (n = 36) and the endovascular repair group (n = 14). In the open repair group, there were 14 deaths (42%) ≤ 30 days of injury, 3 strokes (9%), 2 patients (6%) with paralysis, 2 myocardial infarctions (MIs; 6%), and 3 patients (9%) who required hemodialysis. In the endovascular group, there was 1 death (7%) ≤ 30 days of injury, 1 (7%) stroke, and 1 (7%) stent collapse. No paralysis, MI, or renal failure requiring hemodialysis was noted in the endovascular group. The average length of stay was 15 days for patients treated with endovascular repair vs 24 days for those treated with open repair (P = .003).
CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of BTAT is low but the mortality associated with it is significant. During the 14-year period studied, there was a clear change in management preference from open repair to endovascular repair at our level 1 trauma center. Outcomes, including stroke, MI, renal failure, paralysis, length of stay, and death, appear to be reduced in the endovascular group. Published by Mosby, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23756339     DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2013.01.045

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0741-5214            Impact factor:   4.268


  4 in total

1.  Blunt aortic injury: risk factors and impact of surgical approaches.

Authors:  Chien-Chao Lin; Kuo-Sheng Liu; Huan-Wu Chen; Yao-Kuang Huang; Jaw-Ji Chu; Feng-Chun Tsai; Pyng Jing Lin
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 2.549

2.  Observational management of Grade II or higher blunt traumatic thoracic aortic injury: 15 years of experience at a single suburban institution.

Authors:  Jin Bong Ye; Jin Young Lee; Jin Suk Lee; Se Heon Kim; Hanlim Choi; Yook Kim; Soo Young Yoon; Young Hoon Sul; Jung Hee Choi
Journal:  Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci       Date:  2022-06-24

3.  National trends in utilization and outcome of thoracic endovascular aortic repair for traumatic thoracic aortic injuries.

Authors:  Klaas H J Ultee; Peter A Soden; Victor Chien; Rodney P Bensley; Sara L Zettervall; Hence J M Verhagen; Marc L Schermerhorn
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 4.268

4.  Isolated blunt abdominal aortic injury without concomitant abdominal injuries treated with endovascular stent grafting.

Authors:  Monica N Khattak; Eric V Olivero; Michael A Curi; Ajay K Dhadwal; Frank T Padberg; Joe T Huang
Journal:  J Vasc Surg Cases       Date:  2015-11-07
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.