Literature DB >> 23756218

Local landscape predictors of maximum stream temperature and thermal sensitivity in the Columbia River Basin, USA.

Heejun Chang1, Mike Psaris.   

Abstract

Stream temperature regimes are important determinants of the health of lotic ecosystems, and a proper understanding of the landscape factors affecting stream temperatures is needed for water managers to make informed decisions. We analyzed spatial patterns of thermal sensitivity (response of stream temperature to changes in air temperature) and maximum stream temperature for 74 stations in the Columbia River basin, to identify landscape factors affecting these two indices of stream temperature regimes. Thermal sensitivity (TS) is largely controlled by distance to the Pacific Coast, base flow index, and contributing area. Maximum stream temperature (Tmax) is mainly controlled by base flow index, percent forest land cover, and stream order. The analysis of four different spatial scales--relative contributing area (RCA) scale, RCA buffered scale, 1 km upstream RCA scale, and 1 km upstream buffer scale--yield different significant factors, with topographic factors such as slope becoming more important at the buffer scale analysis for TS. Geographically weighted regression (GWR), which takes into account spatial non-stationary processes, better predicts the spatial variations of TS and Tmax with higher R(2) and lower residual values than ordinary least squares (OLS) estimates. With different coefficient values over space, GWR models explain approximately up to 62% of the variation in TS and Tmax. Percent forest land cover coefficients had both positive and negative values, suggesting that the relative importance of forest changes over space. Such spatially varying GWR coefficients are associated with land cover, hydroclimate, and topographic variables. OLS estimated regression residuals are positively autocorrelated over space at the RCA scale, while the GWR residuals exhibit no spatial autocorrelation at all scales. GWR models provide useful additional information on the spatial processes generating the variations of TS and Tmax, potentially serving as a useful tool for managing stream temperature across multiple scales.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  GIS; Geographically weighted regression; Landscape factors; Spatial analysis; Stream temperature; Water quality

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23756218     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.05.033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  6 in total

1.  Land use/land cover water quality nexus: quantifying anthropogenic influences on surface water quality.

Authors:  Cyril O Wilson
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2015-06-12       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Long-term trends and probability distributions of river water quality variables and their relationships with climate elasticity characteristics.

Authors:  Afed U Khan; Peng Wang; Jiping Jiang; Bin Shi
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2018-10-18       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  Variable wildfire impacts on the seasonal water temperatures of western US streams: A retrospective study.

Authors:  Mussie T Beyene; Scott G Leibowitz; Marcia Snyder; Joseph L Ebersole; Vance W Almquist
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-07-20       Impact factor: 3.752

4.  The spatial non-stationary effect of urban landscape pattern on urban waterlogging: a case study of Shenzhen City.

Authors:  Jiansheng Wu; Wei Sha; Puhua Zhang; Zhenyu Wang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-04-30       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Which environmental factors control extreme thermal events in rivers? A multi-scale approach (Wallonia, Belgium).

Authors:  Blandine Georges; Adrien Michez; Hervé Piegay; Leo Huylenbroeck; Philippe Lejeune; Yves Brostaux
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-11-22       Impact factor: 2.984

6.  Assessing the pollution risk of soil Chromium based on loading capacity of paddy soil at a regional scale.

Authors:  Mingkai Qu; Weidong Li; Chuanrong Zhang; Biao Huang; Yongcun Zhao
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-12-17       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.