Literature DB >> 23755955

Genotoxicity assessment of mouse oocytes by comet assay before vitrification and after warming with three vitrification protocols.

Anais Berthelot-Ricou1, Jeanne Perrin, Carole di Giorgio, Michel de Meo, Alain Botta, Blandine Courbiere.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the genotoxicity of three oocyte vitrification protocols.
DESIGN: Murine assay.
SETTING: Biogenotoxicology research laboratory. ANIMAL(S): CD1 female mice. INTERVENTION(S): Three mouse oocyte groups were exposed to three commercialized human oocyte vitrification protocols. Protocols 1 and 2 contained dimethyl sulfoxide and ethylene glycol (EG), and protocol 3 contained EG and 1,2-propanediol (PrOH). DNA damage was first evaluated by comet assay after oocyte exposure to the three different equilibration and vitrification solutions. Comet assay was also performed after full vitrification and warming procedure and compared with a negative control group (oocytes stored in medium culture only) and a positive control group (oocytes exposed to hydrogen peroxide just before comet assay). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): DNA damage was quantified as Olive tail moment (OTM). Statistical analysis consisted of a Shapiro-Wilk test. Then, median protocol OTM was compared with the negative control group with the Mann-Whitney U test. The difference was considered to be statistically significant if the P value was <.05. RESULT(S): In both parts of our study, protocols 1 and 2 did not induce significant DNA damage, whereas protocol 3 induced statistically higher DNA damage compared with the negative control group. CONCLUSION(S): Vitrification protocols containing PrOH induced significant DNA damage on mouse oocytes, both before cooling and after warming. Therefore, for the moment, we prefer vitrification techniques without PrOH while we await more studies on PrOH toxicity and long-term evaluation.
Copyright © 2013 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DNA damage; Oocyte vitrification; comet assay; cryoprotectants; genotoxicity

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23755955     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.05.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  3 in total

Review 1.  Cryoprotectant Toxicity: Facts, Issues, and Questions.

Authors:  Benjamin P Best
Journal:  Rejuvenation Res       Date:  2015-09-22       Impact factor: 4.663

2.  Effect of mouse oocyte vitrification on mitochondrial membrane potential and distribution.

Authors:  Tao Lei; Na Guo; Mei-Hua Tan; Yu-Feng Li
Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci       Date:  2014-02-06

3.  Slow freezing versus vitrification for the cryopreservation of zebrafish (Danio rerio) ovarian tissue.

Authors:  Lis S Marques; Ana A N Fossati; Rômulo B Rodrigues; Helen T Da Rosa; Aryele P Izaguirry; Juliana B Ramalho; José C F Moreira; Francielli Weber Santos; Tiantian Zhang; Danilo P Streit
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-10-25       Impact factor: 4.379

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.