INTRODUCTION: The ankle brachial index (ABI) is a valid and reliable measurement of lower extremity circulation and can be used as a screening tool for peripheral arterial disease (PAD), but the usage pattern in physical therapy practice is virtually unknown. PURPOSE: This study was performed to describe the phenomenon of using the ABI in outpatient physical therapy practice. METHODS: Nine participants from 3 different outpatient physical therapy clinics were provided with a hand held Doppler and education on how to accurately perform an ABI. Over a 3-month period, participants performed the ABI on any patient presenting with age > 50 with at least two risk factors for PAD. Immediately following the 3-month data collection period, two focus group interviews were performed to examine the therapist's experience using the ABI. Transcripts were analyzed to identify facilitators and barriers to implementation. RESULTS: Facilitators identified include familiarity, ease of use, accuracy, and confidence with results. Barriers included flow and routine disruption, patient did not want/refused, and issues related to direct access. CONCLUSION: Although some barriers to use of the ABI in an outpatient clinical setting need to be considered, most participants found the experience of using the ABI positive and feasible.
INTRODUCTION: The ankle brachial index (ABI) is a valid and reliable measurement of lower extremity circulation and can be used as a screening tool for peripheral arterial disease (PAD), but the usage pattern in physical therapy practice is virtually unknown. PURPOSE: This study was performed to describe the phenomenon of using the ABI in outpatient physical therapy practice. METHODS: Nine participants from 3 different outpatient physical therapy clinics were provided with a hand held Doppler and education on how to accurately perform an ABI. Over a 3-month period, participants performed the ABI on any patient presenting with age > 50 with at least two risk factors for PAD. Immediately following the 3-month data collection period, two focus group interviews were performed to examine the therapist's experience using the ABI. Transcripts were analyzed to identify facilitators and barriers to implementation. RESULTS: Facilitators identified include familiarity, ease of use, accuracy, and confidence with results. Barriers included flow and routine disruption, patient did not want/refused, and issues related to direct access. CONCLUSION: Although some barriers to use of the ABI in an outpatient clinical setting need to be considered, most participants found the experience of using the ABI positive and feasible.
Authors: David Sacks; Curtis W Bakal; Peter T Beatty; Gary J Becker; John F Cardella; Rodney D Raabe; Harvey M Wiener; Curtis A Lewis Journal: J Vasc Interv Radiol Date: 2003-09 Impact factor: 3.464
Authors: Cheryl Rucker-Whitaker; Philip Greenland; Kiang Liu; Cheeling Chan; Jack M Guralnik; Michael H Criqui; Lloyd Taylor; William H Pearce; Mary McGraeMcDermott Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2004-06 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: A T Hirsch; M H Criqui; D Treat-Jacobson; J G Regensteiner; M A Creager; J W Olin; S H Krook; D B Hunninghake; A J Comerota; M E Walsh; M M McDermott; W R Hiatt Journal: JAMA Date: 2001-09-19 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Mary M McDermott; Philip Ades; Jack M Guralnik; Alan Dyer; Luigi Ferrucci; Kiang Liu; Miriam Nelson; Donald Lloyd-Jones; Linda Van Horn; Daniel Garside; Melina Kibbe; Kathryn Domanchuk; James H Stein; Yihua Liao; Huimin Tao; David Green; William H Pearce; Joseph R Schneider; David McPherson; Susan T Laing; Walter J McCarthy; Adhir Shroff; Michael H Criqui Journal: JAMA Date: 2009-01-14 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Julie R Menard; Hadley E Smith; Deborah Riebe; Christina M Braun; Bryan Blissmer; Robert B Patterson Journal: J Vasc Surg Date: 2004-06 Impact factor: 4.268