Literature DB >> 23754917

Percutaneous vertebral augmentation for painful osteolytic vertebral metastasis: a case report.

Giovanni C Anselmetti1, Sean M Tutton, Francis R Facchini, Larry E Miller, Jon E Block.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Vertebral metastases are associated with significant pain, disability, and morbidity. Open surgery for fracture stabilization is often inappropriate in this population due to a poor risk-benefit profile, particularly if life expectancy is short. Percutaneous vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty are appealing adjunctive procedures in patients with malignancy for alleviation of intractable pain. However, these patients have higher risk of serious complications, notably cement extravasation. Described in this report is a case of a painful osteolytic vertebral metastasis that was successfully treated by a novel percutaneous vertebral augmentation system. CASE
PRESENTATION: A 42-year-old Caucasian female presented with a history of metastatic lung cancer unresponsive to radiation and chemotherapy with symptoms inadequately controlled by opiates over the previous 6 months. Magnetic resonance imaging and spiral computed tomography with two-dimensional reconstruction showed an osteolytic vertebral metastasis with complete involvement of the T10 vertebral body, extending to the cortical vertebral wall anteriorly and posteriorly. The patient was treated with percutaneous vertebral augmentation (Kiva® VCF Treatment System, Benvenue Medical, Inc, Santa Clara, CA) utilizing a novel coil-shaped polyetheretherketone implant designed to minimize the risk of cement extravasation. After the minimally invasive procedure, bone cement distribution within the vertebral body was ideal, with no observed cement extravasation. No complications were reported, pain completely resolved within 24 hours, and use of intravenous narcotics was progressively diminished within 1 week. Complete pain relief was maintained throughout 4 months of follow-up.
CONCLUSION: The Kiva System represents a novel and effective minimally invasive treatment option for patients suffering from severe pain due to osteolytic vertebral metastasis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Kiva; minimally invasive; pain

Year:  2012        PMID: 23754917      PMCID: PMC3658248          DOI: 10.2147/IMCRJ.S29569

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Med Case Rep J        ISSN: 1179-142X


Introduction

Vertebral metastases are associated with significant pain, disability, and morbidity. If left untreated, progression of these lesions results in painful microfractures with potential for vertebral level collapse and spinal cord compromise. Open surgery for fracture stabilization is often inappropriate in this patient population due to a poor risk-benefit profile. Given that the average life expectancy in patients with vertebral metastasis is 1 year,1 surgery is undesirable since the postoperative recovery consumes much of the remainder of life. Therefore, nonoperative and minimally invasive techniques are the most appropriate treatment options for vertebral metastases. Percutaneous vertebral augmentation is a minimally invasive procedure involving the injection of polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) into a vertebral body that is either partially collapsed or at high risk for collapse due to osteolysis. Vertebral augmentation is appealing as an adjunct to radiotherapy or chemotherapy in patients with malignancy for alleviation of intractable pain, despite comprehensive nonoperative management. Several studies have reported dramatic improvements in pain severity associated with osteolytic vertebral metastases following percutaneous vertebral augmentation.2–4 However, percutaneous vertebral augmentation is associated with higher risk of complications from PMMA extravasation in cancer patients compared with osteoporotic patients due to loss of cortical integrity.5 As such, malignancy is widely considered a relative contraindication for these procedures. Described in this report is the case of a painful osteolytic vertebral metastasis that was successfully treated by percutaneous vertebral augmentation using a novel coil-shaped polyetheretherketone (PEEK-OPTIMA®, Victrex PLC, Lancashire, UK) implant designed to minimize the risk of PMMA extravasation.

Case presentation

A 42-year-old Caucasian female was referred to our institution in June 2011 for evaluation of pain palliation using percutaneous vertebral augmentation. The patient presented with a 4-year history of metastatic lung cancer unresponsive to radiation and chemotherapy, with symptoms inadequately controlled by opiates over the previous 6 months. The patient reported pain severity of 10 on an 11-point visual analogue scale and back disability of 89% on the Oswestry Disability Index. Magnetic resonance imaging and spiral computed tomography (CT) with two-dimensional reconstruction revealed an osteolytic vertebral metastasis with complete involvement of the T10 vertebral body, extending to the cortical vertebral wall anteriorly and posteriorly (Figure 1).
Figure 1

Preoperative imaging demonstrating osteolytic vertebral metastasis with complete involvement of the T10 vertebral body, extending to the cortical vertebral wall anteriorly and posteriorly.

Notes: T2-weighted short T1 inversion recovery magnetic resonance imaging (top row). Computed tomography (bottom row). Arrow shows the boundary of the bulging metastasis through the cortical wall.

Abbreviation: T1, time to inversion.

Immediately prior to the procedure, the patient was premedicated with intravenous antibiotics (vancomycin hydrochloride 1 g and gentamycin 100 mg). The patient was placed in the prone position on the table of the angiographic suite, and the procedure was carried out with digital hybrid fluoroscopic and CT guidance. The entire procedure was performed under local anesthesia (3 mL of 2% lidocaine hydrochloride at the skin level and deep to include the periosteum) along with continuous monitoring of vital parameters. The PEEK implant is part of the Kiva® VCF Treatment System (Benvenue Medical, Inc, Santa Clara, CA) and is offered in a kit containing an access needle, Kirschner guide-wire, dilator with working cannula, delivery system with nitinol coil guide-wire, and the implant bone cement and its manual screw injection system. The Kiva System received CE Mark approval in December 2008. After a percutaneous approach was accomplished with an 11-gauge needle manually inserted through the costotransversal (extra-pedicular) route to reach the midline and close to the upper endplate of the T10 vertebral body (Figure 2A), a Kirschner guide-wire was inserted to allow the placement of a 6-gauge working cannula (Figure 2B). Through the 6-gauge introducer, the delivery system was inserted to allow the deployment of a nitinol coil-shaped guide-wire into the vertebral body (Figure 2C). The Kiva implant was then delivered over the nitinol guide-wire (Figure 2D) inside the osteolytic lesion of the vertebra (Figure 2E) to form a nesting, cylindrical column. Up to four loops of the implant may be inserted into the vertebral body for a maximum coil stack of 12 mm, which re-elevates the endplate. After the coil was retracted, a total of 6 mL of radiopaque bone cement was gradually injected using a manual screw injector through the Kiva implant and its inner holes under fluoroscopic monitoring (Figure 2F). Post-procedural CT scan with multi-planar reformatting demonstrated a satisfactory bone cement distribution within the vertebral body and the complete absence of extravasation either anteriorly or posteriorly (Figure 3). The minimally invasive procedure was successfully concluded without clinical complication. Pain severity decreased from 10 to 0 within 48 hours, and analgesic opiate use was suspended. Back disability improved from 89% to 2%. The patient was followed at 15 days, 1 month, 6 weeks, and 4 months post-treatment. Complete pain relief was maintained throughout 4 months of follow-up with no further need of analgesia.
Figure 2

Intraoperative images demonstrating: (A) access with 11-gauge needle; (B) introduction of the dilator; (C) placement of working cannula in lateral view with Kiva® Coil showing; (D) deployed Kiva implant in lateral view; (E) deployed Kiva implant in anteroposterior view; and (F) completed procedure with cement fill.

Figure 3

Reformatted postoperative computed tomography scan demonstrating satisfactory bone cement distribution within the T10 vertebral body and the complete absence of extravasation either anteriorly or posteriorly.

Note: Arrows show coil implant boundaries.

Discussion

The treatment of painful vertebral metastases is a major therapeutic challenge. Radiation therapy is only marginally effective with mediocre pain relief durability. Further, previously radiated vertebral levels are at elevated risk for collapse, with potentially devastating neurologic consequences. This case report shows that percutaneous vertebral augmentation using the novel coil-shaped PEEK Kiva implant is feasible, effective, and may reduce the risk of PMMA extravasation in the treatment of painful osteolytic vertebral metastases with diffuse cortical bone involvement. The results of this report are novel in that the Kiva implant represents a new therapeutic option for the treatment of painful vertebral metastasis where radiation therapy, traditional surgical stabilization, or balloon-based vertebral augmentation procedures may be contraindicated. Chew et al3 conducted a systematic review on the safety and efficacy of percutaneous vertebral augmentation for spinal metastases and myeloma. Although vertebral augmentation reduced pain severity by 47%–87%, serious complications were reported in up to 12% of patients. The risk of cement extravasation is also notably higher in malignancies due to high vascularization and osseous destruction.5 Resulting complications may include intercostal neuralgia, radiculopathy, myelopathy, or spinal infections.6 The Kiva System was designed to reduce and stabilize vertebral fractures by deploying a coiled PEEK implant, which is then augmented with cement. PMMA bone cement is injected through the lumen of the Kiva implant, which helps to contain and control the distribution of the cement. Once cured, the cement interlocks the implant to the cancellous bone. With traditional kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty procedures, PMMA is injected into cancellous bone, but there is no mechanism for cement containment. Consequently, PMMA cement may leak laterally to the soft tissues, superiorly or inferiorly into the adjacent disc space, or posteriorly, where it may involve the exiting nerve root or the spinal canal.6 A recent clinical study was conducted with the Kiva System in 26 patients (42 fractures) for treatment of vertebral compression fractures.7 Anterior cement extravasation was identified at 4.8% of levels with no reported intracanal extravasation or adverse clinical sequelae. These results compare favorably to cement extravasation rates of 7%–72% reported in previous studies.8–12 The mechanism of pain amelioration with percutaneous vertebral augmentation is currently unknown, although two main hypotheses prevail. Polymethyl methacrylate cement stabilizes vertebral microfractures, which eliminates painful vertebral body and periosteal micromovements.13 In addition, the thermal polymerization of PMMA following injection ablates pain receptors in trabecular bone, in vertebral periosteum, and in vascular structures.14 The combination of these two proposed factors leads to immediate postoperative anterior column stability and pain relief.4

Conclusion

The Kiva System represents a novel and effective minimally invasive treatment option for patients suffering from severe pain due to osteolytic vertebral metastasis. The novel design of the Kiva implant may reduce the risk for PMMA extravasation versus traditional vertebral augmentation procedures. Prospective studies are needed to validate the safety and effectiveness of this device in patients with vertebral metastasis.

Consent

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and accompanying images.
  14 in total

Review 1.  Efficacy and safety of balloon kyphoplasty in the treatment of vertebral compression fractures: a systematic review.

Authors:  Carmen Bouza; Teresa López; Angeles Magro; Lourdes Navalpotro; José María Amate
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-01-21       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  Balloon kyphoplasty in the management of vertebral compression fractures: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Rod S Taylor; Peter Fritzell; Rebecca J Taylor
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-02-03       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Intradiscal cement leak following percutaneous vertebroplasty.

Authors:  Yigal Mirovsky; Yoram Anekstein; Ehud Shalmon; Alexander Blankstein; Amir Peer
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2006-05-01       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 4.  Safety and efficacy of percutaneous vertebroplasty in malignancy: a systematic review.

Authors:  C Chew; L Craig; R Edwards; J Moss; P J O'Dwyer
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2010-11-16       Impact factor: 2.350

Review 5.  Percutaneous vertebral augmentation in metastatic disease: state of the art.

Authors:  Flavio Tancioni; Martin A Lorenzetti; Pierina Navarria; Federico Pessina; Riccardo Draghi; Paolo Pedrazzoli; Marta Scorsetti; Marco Alloisio; Armando Santoro; Riccardo Rodriguez y Baena
Journal:  J Support Oncol       Date:  2011 Jan-Feb

6.  An evidence-based evaluation of percutaneous vertebroplasty.

Authors:  S A Levine; L A Perin; D Hayes; W S Hayes
Journal:  Manag Care       Date:  2000-03

Review 7.  Spinal metastasis in the elderly.

Authors:  Max Aebi
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2003-09-23       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Percutaneous vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty for painful vertebral body fractures in cancer patients.

Authors:  Daryl R Fourney; Donald F Schomer; Remi Nader; Jennifer Chlan-Fourney; Dima Suki; Kamran Ahrar; Laurence D Rhines; Ziya L Gokaslan
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 5.115

9.  Comparison of vertebroplasty and balloon kyphoplasty for treatment of vertebral compression fractures: a meta-analysis of the literature.

Authors:  Jason C Eck; Dean Nachtigall; S Craig Humphreys; Scott D Hodges
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2007-05-29       Impact factor: 4.166

10.  Initial clinical experience with a novel vertebral augmentation system for treatment of symptomatic vertebral compression fractures: a case series of 26 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Panagiotis Korovessis; Thomas Repantis; Larry E Miller; Jon E Block
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.