Literature DB >> 23754452

Suction test to demonstrate the peritoneal edge during laparoscopic extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair.

Christopher Nahm1, Jason Free, Sivakumar Gananadha, Thomas J Hugh, Jaswinder S Samra.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Inadequate peritoneal dissection from retroperitoneal structures may account for a large number of hernia recurrences amongst surgeons and trainees who are new to totally extraperitoneal (TEP) laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. In this paper, we describe a simple dynamic test that allows surgeons to better appreciate the peritoneal edge during the initial dissection phase of TEP inguinal hernia repair, allowing for more adequate dissection of the peritoneum from retroperitoneal structures before placement of mesh.
METHODS: Data from a single surgeon was collected on 113 consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic TEP inguinal hernia repair at the Royal North Shore Hospital in Sydney. The data was retrospectively reviewed to determine the number of cases in which the suction test led to further peritoneal dissection prior to mesh placement. OPERATIVE TECHNIQUE: After balloon dissection of the pre-peritoneal space and initial dissection of peritoneum and sac from retroperitoneal structures, a laparoscopic suction device is used to aspirate the insufflated gas from the pre-peritoneal space to cause the peritoneum to bulge anteriorly, thus demonstrating the edge of the peritoneal reflection. Further dissection is performed if deemed necessary at this point, and the mesh is placed over the hernia defect.
RESULTS: 136 TEP hernia repairs were performed in 113 patients. In 26 (23 %) of patients, the abovementioned technique was of particular value resulting in further dissection of peritoneum prior to mesh placement. There were no complications as a direct result of the test.
CONCLUSION: This dynamic suction test is a risk-free and useful operative tool for surgeons and trainees who are new to TEP inguinal hernia repair, and provides a definitive way of identifying the peritoneal reflection to ensure the peritoneum has been dissected adequately prior to mesh placement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23754452     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-013-3031-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  15 in total

1.  Guidelines for laparoscopic (TAPP) and endoscopic (TEP) treatment of inguinal hernia [International Endohernia Society (IEHS)].

Authors:  R Bittner; M E Arregui; T Bisgaard; M Dudai; G S Ferzli; R J Fitzgibbons; R H Fortelny; U Klinge; F Kockerling; E Kuhry; J Kukleta; D Lomanto; M C Misra; A Montgomery; S Morales-Conde; W Reinpold; J Rosenberg; S Sauerland; C Schug-Pass; K Singh; M Timoney; D Weyhe; P Chowbey
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-07-13       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  A meta-analysis of surgical morbidity and recurrence after laparoscopic and open repair of primary unilateral inguinal hernia.

Authors:  Elma A O'Reilly; John P Burke; P Ronan O'Connell
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Randomized clinical trial of total extraperitoneal inguinal hernioplasty vs Lichtenstein repair: a long-term follow-up study.

Authors:  Hasan H Eker; Hester R Langeveld; Pieter J Klitsie; Martijne van't Riet; Laurents P S Stassen; Wibo F Weidema; Ewout W Steyerberg; Johan F Lange; Hendrik J Bonjer; Johannes Jeekel
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2012-03

4.  The Endoloop technique for the primary closure of direct inguinal hernia defect during the endoscopic totally extraperitoneal approach.

Authors:  C R Berney
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2011-11-27       Impact factor: 4.739

5.  Chronic pain 5 years after randomized comparison of laparoscopic and Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair.

Authors:  A Eklund; A Montgomery; L Bergkvist; C Rudberg
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 6.  Laparoscopic surgery for inguinal hernia repair: systematic review of effectiveness and economic evaluation.

Authors:  K McCormack; B Wake; J Perez; C Fraser; J Cook; E McIntosh; L Vale; A Grant
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 4.014

7.  Open mesh versus laparoscopic mesh repair of inguinal hernia.

Authors:  Leigh Neumayer; Anita Giobbie-Hurder; Olga Jonasson; Robert Fitzgibbons; Dorothy Dunlop; James Gibbs; Domenic Reda; William Henderson
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-04-25       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Comparison of recurrence with lightweight composite polypropylene mesh and heavyweight mesh in laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: an audit of 1,232 repairs.

Authors:  D Akolekar; S Kumar; L R Khan; A C de Beaux; S J Nixon
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2007-09-13       Impact factor: 4.739

9.  A prospective comparative study of needlescopic and conventional endoscopic extraperitoneal inguinal hernioplasty.

Authors:  H Lau; F Lee
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2002-06-27       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 10.  Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair using an anatomically contoured three-dimensional mesh.

Authors:  R C W Bell; J G Price
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-09-10       Impact factor: 4.584

View more
  1 in total

1.  Minimizing complications following transinguinal preperitoneal modified Kugel mesh herniorrhaphy: a double blind prospective randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Heng-Chieh Chiang; Jesun Lin; Jian-Ting Chen; Yu-Chi Hsu; Pao-Hwa Chen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-09-30       Impact factor: 4.996

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.