F Crovetto1, F Crispi, E Scazzocchio, I Mercade, E Meler, F Figueras, E Gratacos. 1. Maternal-Fetal Medicine Department, ICGON, Hospital Clínic, Universitat de Barcelona; Fetal and Perinatal Medicine Research Group, Institut d'Investigacions Biomediques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS); and Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Raras (CIBERER), Barcelona, Spain; Fondazione Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Dipartimento Ostetricia e Ginecologia, Univerisità degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of first-trimester screening for early and late small-for-gestational-age (SGA) neonates using maternal serum biochemistry, blood pressure and uterine artery Doppler. METHODS: This was a prospective study of 4970 women with a singleton pregnancy who underwent routine first-trimester screening between 2009 and 2011. A logistic regression-based predictive model for SGA, defined as birth weight < 10(th) percentile, divided into early- or late-onset based on gestational age at delivery before or after 34 weeks' gestation, was constructed. The model included maternal baseline characteristics: serum levels of pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A and free β-human chorionic gonadotropin at 8-12 weeks and blood pressure and uterine artery Doppler at 11 + 0 to 13 + 6 weeks. RESULTS: The prevalence of early and late SGA was 0.6% and 7.9%, respectively. Association with pre-eclampsia was 67% and 8%, respectively. At a false-positive rate of 15%, the detection rate for early SGA was 73%; however it differed substantially for cases with and without pre-eclampsia (90% vs 40%). For late SGA, at false-positive rates of 15 and 50%, detection rates were 32% and 70%, respectively, and did not substantially differ between cases with and without pre-eclampsia. CONCLUSIONS: First-trimester screening predicts early SGA mainly because of its strong association with pre-eclampsia. Although prediction of late SGA was poorer, at a high false-positive rate it might be considered as part of a first-trimester strategy to select women requiring ultrasound assessment in the third trimester.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of first-trimester screening for early and late small-for-gestational-age (SGA) neonates using maternal serum biochemistry, blood pressure and uterine artery Doppler. METHODS: This was a prospective study of 4970 women with a singleton pregnancy who underwent routine first-trimester screening between 2009 and 2011. A logistic regression-based predictive model for SGA, defined as birth weight < 10(th) percentile, divided into early- or late-onset based on gestational age at delivery before or after 34 weeks' gestation, was constructed. The model included maternal baseline characteristics: serum levels of pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A and free β-human chorionic gonadotropin at 8-12 weeks and blood pressure and uterine artery Doppler at 11 + 0 to 13 + 6 weeks. RESULTS: The prevalence of early and late SGA was 0.6% and 7.9%, respectively. Association with pre-eclampsia was 67% and 8%, respectively. At a false-positive rate of 15%, the detection rate for early SGA was 73%; however it differed substantially for cases with and without pre-eclampsia (90% vs 40%). For late SGA, at false-positive rates of 15 and 50%, detection rates were 32% and 70%, respectively, and did not substantially differ between cases with and without pre-eclampsia. CONCLUSIONS: First-trimester screening predicts early SGA mainly because of its strong association with pre-eclampsia. Although prediction of late SGA was poorer, at a high false-positive rate it might be considered as part of a first-trimester strategy to select women requiring ultrasound assessment in the third trimester.
Authors: Nir Melamed; Ahmet Baschat; Yoav Yinon; Apostolos Athanasiadis; Federico Mecacci; Francesc Figueras; Vincenzo Berghella; Amala Nazareth; Muna Tahlak; H David McIntyre; Fabrício Da Silva Costa; Anne B Kihara; Eran Hadar; Fionnuala McAuliffe; Mark Hanson; Ronald C Ma; Rachel Gooden; Eyal Sheiner; Anil Kapur; Hema Divakar; Diogo Ayres-de-Campos; Liran Hiersch; Liona C Poon; John Kingdom; Roberto Romero; Moshe Hod Journal: Int J Gynaecol Obstet Date: 2021-03 Impact factor: 3.561
Authors: Andrea Dall'Asta; Valentina Brunelli; Federico Prefumo; Tiziana Frusca; Christoph C Lees Journal: Matern Health Neonatol Perinatol Date: 2017-01-18
Authors: Ignacio Herraiz; Elisa Simón; Paula Isabel Gómez-Arriaga; José Manuel Martínez-Moratalla; Antonio García-Burguillo; Elena Ana López Jiménez; Alberto Galindo Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2015-08-13 Impact factor: 5.923
Authors: Lje Meertens; Ljm Smits; Smj van Kuijk; R Aardenburg; Ima van Dooren; J Langenveld; I M Zwaan; Mea Spaanderman; Hcj Scheepers Journal: BJOG Date: 2019-01-17 Impact factor: 6.531