Literature DB >> 23754203

Women's intentions to receive cervical cancer screening with primary human papillomavirus testing.

Gina S Ogilvie1, Laurie W Smith, Dirk J van Niekerk, Fareeza Khurshed, Mel Krajden, Mona Saraiya, Vivek Goel, Barbara K Rimer, Sandra B Greene, Suzanne Hobbs, Andrew J Coldman, Eduardo L Franco.   

Abstract

We explored the potential impact of human papillomavirus (HPV) testing on women's intentions to be screened for cervical cancer in a cohort of Canadian women. Participants aged 25-65 years from an ongoing trial were sent a questionnaire to assess women's intentions to be screened for cervical cancer with HPV testing instead of Pap smears and to be screened every 4 years or after 25 years of age. We created scales for attitudes about HPV testing, perceived behavioral control, and direct and indirect subjective norms. Demographic data and scales that were significantly different (p < 0.1) between women who intended to be screened with HPV and those who did not intend were included in a stepwise logistic regression model. Of the 2,016 invitations emailed, 1,538 were received, and 981 completed surveys for a response rate of 63% (981/1,538). Eighty-four percent of women (826/981) responded that they intended to attend for HPV-based cervical cancer screening, which decreased to 54.2% when the screening interval was extended, and decreased further to 51.4% when screening start was delayed to age of 25. Predictors of intentions to undergo screening were attitudes (odds ratio [OR]: 1.22; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.15, 1.30), indirect subjective norms (OR: 1.02; 95% CI: 1.01, 1.03) and perceived behavioral control (OR: 1.16; 95% CI: 1.10; 1.22). Intentions to be screened for cervical cancer with HPV testing decreased substantially when the screening interval was extended and screening started at age of 25. Use of primary HPV testing may optimize the screening paradigm, but programs should ensure robust planning and education to mitigate any negative impact on screening attendance rates.
Copyright © 2013 UICC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  HPV; cervical cancer screening; intention; theory of planned behavior

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23754203      PMCID: PMC4515309          DOI: 10.1002/ijc.28324

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cancer        ISSN: 0020-7136            Impact factor:   7.396


  40 in total

1.  The psychosocial burden of HPV: a mixed-method study of knowledge, attitudes and behaviors among HPV+ women.

Authors:  Ellen M Daley; Karen M Kay Perrin; Robert J McDermott; Cheryl A Vamos; Holly L Rayko; Jennifer Lee Packing-Ebuen; Candace Webb; Mary McFarlane
Journal:  J Health Psychol       Date:  2010-03

2.  Age-specific evaluation of primary human papillomavirus screening vs conventional cytology in a randomized setting.

Authors:  Maarit Leinonen; Pekka Nieminen; Laura Kotaniemi-Talonen; Nea Malila; Jussi Tarkkanen; Pekka Laurila; Ahti Anttila
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2009-11-09       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  HPV knowledge, attitudes, and cultural beliefs among Hispanic men and women living on the Texas-Mexico border.

Authors:  Maria E Fernandez; Sheryl A McCurdy; Sarah R Arvey; Sandra K Tyson; Daisy Morales-Campos; Belinda Flores; Bernardo Useche; Lisa Mitchell-Bennett; Maureen Sanderson
Journal:  Ethn Health       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.772

4.  Efficacy of human papillomavirus testing for the detection of invasive cervical cancers and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Guglielmo Ronco; Paolo Giorgi-Rossi; Francesca Carozzi; Massimo Confortini; Paolo Dalla Palma; Annarosa Del Mistro; Bruno Ghiringhello; Salvatore Girlando; Anna Gillio-Tos; Laura De Marco; Carlo Naldoni; Paola Pierotti; Raffaella Rizzolo; Patrizia Schincaglia; Manuel Zorzi; Marco Zappa; Nereo Segnan; Jack Cuzick
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2010-01-18       Impact factor: 41.316

5.  Anticipated shame and worry following an abnormal Pap test result: the impact of information about HPV.

Authors:  Jo Waller; Laura A V Marlow; Jane Wardle
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2008-11-14       Impact factor: 4.018

6.  A randomized controlled trial of Human Papillomavirus (HPV) testing for cervical cancer screening: trial design and preliminary results (HPV FOCAL Trial).

Authors:  Gina S Ogilvie; Dirk J van Niekerk; Mel Krajden; Ruth E Martin; Thomas G Ehlen; Kathy Ceballos; Stuart J Peacock; Laurie W Smith; Lisa Kan; Darrel A Cook; Wendy Mei; Gavin C E Stuart; Eduardo L Franco; Andrew J Coldman
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 4.430

7.  Preferences for human papillomavirus testing with routine cervical cancer screening in diverse older women.

Authors:  Alison J Huang; Eliseo J Pérez-Stable; Sue E Kim; Sabrina T Wong; Celia P Kaplan; Judith M E Walsh; A Yuri Iwaoka-Scott; George F Sawaya
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2008-05-28       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 8.  EUROGIN 2008 roadmap on cervical cancer prevention.

Authors:  Silvia Franceschi; Jack Cuzick; Rolando Herrero; Joakim Dillner; Cosette M Wheeler
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2009-11-15       Impact factor: 7.396

9.  Rate of cervical cancer, severe intraepithelial neoplasia, and adenocarcinoma in situ in primary HPV DNA screening with cytology triage: randomised study within organised screening programme.

Authors:  Ahti Anttila; Laura Kotaniemi-Talonen; Maarit Leinonen; Matti Hakama; Pekka Laurila; Jussi Tarkkanen; Nea Malila; Pekka Nieminen
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2010-04-27

10.  Long term predictive values of cytology and human papillomavirus testing in cervical cancer screening: joint European cohort study.

Authors:  Joakim Dillner; Matejka Rebolj; Philippe Birembaut; Karl-Ulrich Petry; Anne Szarewski; Christian Munk; Silvia de Sanjose; Pontus Naucler; Belen Lloveras; Susanne Kjaer; Jack Cuzick; Marjolein van Ballegooijen; Christine Clavel; Thomas Iftner
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2008-10-13
View more
  18 in total

1.  Implementation considerations using HPV self-collection to reach women under-screened for cervical cancer in high-income settings.

Authors:  H N Pedersen; L W Smith; C Sarai Racey; D Cook; M Krajden; D van Niekerk; G S Ogilvie
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2018-02-28       Impact factor: 3.677

2.  The Effect of Peer-Led Navigation Approach as a Form of Task Shifting in Promoting Cervical Cancer Screening Knowledge, Intention, and Practices Among Urban Women in Tanzania: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Joanes Faustine Mboineki; Panpan Wang; Kamala Dhakal; Mikiyas Amare Getu; Changying Chen
Journal:  Cancer Control       Date:  2022 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 2.339

3.  Ensuring a Successful Transition From Cytology to Human Papillomavirus-Based Primary Cervical Cancer Screening in Canada by Investigating the Psychosocial Correlates of Women's Intentions: Protocol for an Observational Study.

Authors:  Gabrielle Griffin-Mathieu; Ben Haward; Ovidiu Tatar; Patricia Zhu; Samara Perez; Gilla K Shapiro; Emily McBride; Erika L Thompson; Laurie W Smith; Aisha K Lofters; Ellen M Daley; Juliet R Guichon; Jo Waller; Marc Steben; Kathleen M Decker; Marie-Helene Mayrand; Julia M L Brotherton; Gina S Ogilvie; Gregory D Zimet; Teresa Norris; Zeev Rosberger
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2022-06-16

4.  Primary HPV testing recommendations of US providers, 2015.

Authors:  Crystale Purvis Cooper; Mona Saraiya
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 4.018

5.  Intention to Screen for Cervical Cancer Among Child Bearing Age Women in Bahir Dar City, North-West Ethiopia: Using Theory of Planned Behavior.

Authors:  Wallelign Alemnew; Getu Debalkie; Telake Azale
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2020-12-17

6.  Intention to receive a COVID-19 vaccine: results from a population-based survey in Canada.

Authors:  Gina S Ogilvie; Shanlea Gordon; Laurie W Smith; Arianne Albert; C Sarai Racey; Amy Booth; Anna Gottschlich; David Goldfarb; Melanie C M Murray; Liisa A M Galea; Angela Kaida; Lori A Brotto; Manish Sadarangani
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2021-05-29       Impact factor: 3.295

7.  'It has saved thousands of lives, so why change it?' Content analysis of objections to cervical screening programme changes in Australia.

Authors:  Helena M Obermair; Rachael H Dodd; Carissa Bonner; Jesse Jansen; Kirsten McCaffery
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Intent to participate in future cervical cancer screenings is lower when satisfaction with the decision to be vaccinated is neutral.

Authors:  Natalie Marya Alexander; Diane Medved Harper; Johanna Claire Comes; Melissa Smith Smith; Melinda Ann Heutinck; Sandra Martin Handley; Debra Ann Ahern
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-10       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Women's intentions to self-collect samples for human papillomavirus testing in an organized cervical cancer screening program.

Authors:  Laurie W Smith; Fareeza Khurshed; Dirk J van Niekerk; Mel Krajden; Sandra B Greene; Suzanne Hobbs; Andrew J Coldman; Eduardo L Franco; Gina S Ogilvie
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2014-10-10       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  Correlates of women's intentions to be screened for human papillomavirus for cervical cancer screening with an extended interval.

Authors:  Gina S Ogilvie; Laurie W Smith; Dirk van Niekerk; Fareeza Khurshed; Heather N Pedersen; Darlene Taylor; Katharine Thomson; Sandra B Greene; Suzanne M Babich; Eduardo L Franco; Andrew J Coldman
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 3.295

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.