Literature DB >> 23753242

Accuracy of noninvasive and continuous hemoglobin measurement by pulse co-oximetry during preoperative phlebotomy.

Elisabeth Dewhirst1, Aymen Naguib2, Peter Winch2, Julie Rice1, Mark Galantowicz3, Patrick McConnell3, Joseph D Tobias4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In recent years, the continuous noninvasive hemoglobin measurement has been offered by devices using advanced pulse oximetry technology. Accuracy has been established in healthy adults as well as in surgical and intensive care unit patients but not in the setting of acute hemorrhage. In this study, we evaluated the accuracy of such a device in the clinical setting of preoperative phlebotomy thereby mimicking a scenario of acute blood loss.
METHODS: This prospective study included patients undergoing surgical repair of congenital heart disease (CHD) for whom preoperative phlebotomy was planned. Blood was removed after the induction of anesthesia and prior to the start of the surgical procedure. Replacement with crystalloid was guided by hemodynamic variables and cerebral oxygenation measured by near-infrared spectroscopy. Hemoglobin was measured by bedside whole blood analysis (total hemoglobin [tHb]) before and after phlebotomy, and concurrent measurements from the pulse co-oximeter (noninvasive, continuous, or spot-check testing of total hemoglobin [SpHb]) were recorded.
RESULTS: The study cohort included 45 patients ranging in age from 3 months to 50 years. Preoperative phlebotomy removed an average of 9.2 mL/kg of blood that was replaced with an average of 7.2 mL/kg of crystalloid. The pre- and postphlebotomy tHb values were 13.0 ± 1.9 and 12.4 ± 1.8 g/dL, respectively. The absolute difference between the tHb and SpHb (▵Hb) was 1.2 ± 0.1 g/dL. Bland-Altman analysis revealed a bias of 0.1 g/dL, a precision of 1.5 g/dL, and 95% limits of agreement of -2.8 to 3.1 g/dL. In 52.2% of the sample sets, the SpHb was within 1 g/dL of the actual hemoglobin value (tHb), and in 80% of the sample sets, the SpHb was within 2 g/dL. No variation in the accuracy of the deviation was noted based on the patient's age, weight, or type of CHD (cyanotic versus acyanotic).
CONCLUSION: The current study demonstrates that the accuracy of continuous, noninvasive hemoglobin measurement was not affected by acute blood loss simulated by preoperative phlebotomy. Although the device provided a clinically acceptable correlation with the actual hemoglobin value and offers the value of a continuous trend monitor, given the precision of the device, it does not appear that actual transfusion decisions can be based on the device alone.
© The Author(s) 2013.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acute normovolemic hemodilution; Monitoring and pediatric cardiac surgery; Non invasive hemoglobin monitoring

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23753242     DOI: 10.1177/0885066613485355

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Intensive Care Med        ISSN: 0885-0666            Impact factor:   3.510


  10 in total

1.  Disposable platform provides visual and color-based point-of-care anemia self-testing.

Authors:  Erika A Tyburski; Scott E Gillespie; William A Stoy; Robert G Mannino; Alexander J Weiss; Alexa F Siu; Rayford H Bulloch; Karthik Thota; Anyela Cardenas; Wilena Session; Hanna J Khoury; Siobhán O'Connor; Silvia T Bunting; Jeanne Boudreaux; Craig R Forest; Manila Gaddh; Traci Leong; L Andrew Lyon; Wilbur A Lam
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2014-08-26       Impact factor: 14.808

2.  A noninvasive hemoglobin monitor in the pediatric intensive care unit.

Authors:  Michael R Phillips; Amal L Khoury; Andrey V Bortsov; Amy Marzinsky; Kathy A Short; Bruce A Cairns; Anthony G Charles; Benny L Joyner; Sean E McLean
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2015-01-09       Impact factor: 2.192

3.  Comparison of the accuracy of noninvasive hemoglobin monitoring for preoperative evaluation between adult and pediatric patients: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Yong-Hee Park; Seho Lim; Hyun Kang; Hwa-Yong Shin; Chong Wha Baek; Young Cheol Woo
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 2.502

4.  Comparison of invasive and noninvasive blood hemoglobin measurement in the operating room: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hosein Shabaninejad; Nashmil Ghadimi; Kourosh Sayehmiri; Hossein Hosseinifard; Rasoul Azarfarin; Hasan Abolghasem Gorji
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2019-03-20       Impact factor: 2.078

5.  Validation of noninvasive hemoglobin measurement by pulse co-oximeter in newborn infants.

Authors:  C Nicholas; R George; S Sardesai; M Durand; R Ramanathan; R Cayabyab
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 2.521

6.  Perioperative Management of a Child with Hypoplastic Left Heart Syndrome of the Jehovah's Witness Faith Presenting for Hybrid Comprehensive Stage II Procedure.

Authors:  Sathappan Karuppiah; Christopher Mckee; Ashley Hodge; Mark Galantowicz; Joseph Tobias; Aymen Naguib
Journal:  J Extra Corpor Technol       Date:  2016-09

7.  Accuracy and trending of non-invasive hemoglobin measurement during different volume and perfusion statuses.

Authors:  Abdelmoneim Adel; Wael Awada; Bassant Abdelhamid; Heba Omar; Omnia Abd El Dayem; Ahmed Hasanin; Ashraf Rady
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2018-01-15       Impact factor: 2.502

8.  The Effect of Autologus Blood Priming on Cerebral Oximetry in Congenital Cardiac Surgery Patients.

Authors:  Ashley Hodge; Apryl Cohen; Peter Winch; Dmitry Tumin; Jeffrey Burnside; Todd Ratliff; Mark Galantowicz; Aymen Naguib
Journal:  J Extra Corpor Technol       Date:  2017-09

9.  Meta-analytic estimation of measurement variability and assessment of its impact on decision-making: the case of perioperative haemoglobin concentration monitoring.

Authors:  Emmanuel Charpentier; Vincent Looten; Björn Fahlgren; Alexandre Barna; Loïc Guillevin
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 4.615

10.  Post marketing study of hemodynamic and hematological noninvasive readings in a blood bank.

Authors:  Yosef Joseph Segman; Ella Sheiman
Journal:  SAGE Open Med       Date:  2018-08-27
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.