OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to determine the frequency of adverse perinatal outcome in women with hyperemesis gravidarum and identify prognostic factors. STUDY DESIGN: This is a case-control study in which outcomes of first pregnancies were compared between 254 women with hyperemesis gravidarum treated with intravenous fluids and 308 controls. Prognostic factors were identified by comparing the clinical profile of patients with hyperemesis gravidarum with a normal and an adverse pregnancy outcome. Binary responses were analyzed using either a Chi-square or Fisher exact test and continuous responses were analyzed using a t-test. RESULTS: Women with hyperemesis gravidarum have over a 4-fold increased risk of poor outcome including preterm birth and lower birth weight (p<0.0001). Among maternal characteristics, only gestational hypertension had an influence on outcome (p<0.0001). Treatment as an outpatient and/or by alternative medicine (acupuncture/acupressure/Bowen massage) was associated with a positive outcome (p<0.0089). Poor outcomes were associated with early start of symptoms (p<0.019), and treatment with methylprednisolone (p<0.0217), promethazine (p<0.0386), and other antihistamines [diphenhydramine (Benadryl), dimenhydrinate (Gravol), doxylamine (Unisom), hydroxyzine (Vistaril/Atarax), doxylamine and pyridoxine (Diclectin/Bendectin)] (p<0.0151) independent of effectiveness. Among these medications, only the other antihistamines were prescribed independent of severity: they were effective in less than 20% of cases and were taken by almost 50% of patients with an adverse outcome. CONCLUSION: Poor outcomes are significantly greater in women with HG and are associated with gestational hypertension, early symptoms, and antihistamine use. Given these results, there is an urgent need to address the safety and effectiveness of medications containing antihistamines in women with severe nausea of pregnancy.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to determine the frequency of adverse perinatal outcome in women with hyperemesis gravidarum and identify prognostic factors. STUDY DESIGN: This is a case-control study in which outcomes of first pregnancies were compared between 254 women with hyperemesis gravidarum treated with intravenous fluids and 308 controls. Prognostic factors were identified by comparing the clinical profile of patients with hyperemesis gravidarum with a normal and an adverse pregnancy outcome. Binary responses were analyzed using either a Chi-square or Fisher exact test and continuous responses were analyzed using a t-test. RESULTS:Women with hyperemesis gravidarum have over a 4-fold increased risk of poor outcome including preterm birth and lower birth weight (p<0.0001). Among maternal characteristics, only gestational hypertension had an influence on outcome (p<0.0001). Treatment as an outpatient and/or by alternative medicine (acupuncture/acupressure/Bowen massage) was associated with a positive outcome (p<0.0089). Poor outcomes were associated with early start of symptoms (p<0.019), and treatment with methylprednisolone (p<0.0217), promethazine (p<0.0386), and other antihistamines [diphenhydramine (Benadryl), dimenhydrinate (Gravol), doxylamine (Unisom), hydroxyzine (Vistaril/Atarax), doxylamine and pyridoxine (Diclectin/Bendectin)] (p<0.0151) independent of effectiveness. Among these medications, only the other antihistamines were prescribed independent of severity: they were effective in less than 20% of cases and were taken by almost 50% of patients with an adverse outcome. CONCLUSION: Poor outcomes are significantly greater in women with HG and are associated with gestational hypertension, early symptoms, and antihistamine use. Given these results, there is an urgent need to address the safety and effectiveness of medications containing antihistamines in women with severe nausea of pregnancy.
Authors: N Micali; B De Stavola; I dos-Santos-Silva; J Steenweg-de Graaff; P W Jansen; V W V Jaddoe; A Hofman; F C Verhulst; E A P Steegers; H Tiemeier Journal: BJOG Date: 2012-08-20 Impact factor: 6.531
Authors: R H F van Oppenraaij; E Jauniaux; O B Christiansen; J A Horcajadas; R G Farquharson; N Exalto Journal: Hum Reprod Update Date: 2009-03-07 Impact factor: 15.610
Authors: Juliane Spiegler; G Stichtenoth; J Weichert; I R König; M Schlaud; A V D Wense; D Olbertz; H Gurth; J-H Schiffmann; B Bohnhorst; L Gortner; E Herting; W Göpel Journal: Arch Gynecol Obstet Date: 2013-02-12 Impact factor: 2.344
Authors: Marlena S Fejzo; Borzouyeh Poursharif; Lisa M Korst; Shari Munch; Kimber W MacGibbon; Roberto Romero; T Murphy Goodwin Journal: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Date: 2009-12 Impact factor: 2.681
Authors: T Murphy Goodwin; Borzouyeh Poursharif; Lisa M Korst; Kimber W MacGibbon; Roberto Romero; Marlena S Fejzo Journal: Am J Perinatol Date: 2008-02-07 Impact factor: 1.862
Authors: Marlena S Fejzo; Olga V Sazonova; J Fah Sathirapongsasuti; Ingileif B Hallgrímsdóttir; Vladimir Vacic; Kimber W MacGibbon; Frederic P Schoenberg; Nicholas Mancuso; Dennis J Slamon; Patrick M Mullin Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2018-03-21 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Ho Yeon Kim; Geum Joon Cho; So Yeon Kim; Kyu-Min Lee; Ki Hoon Ahn; Sung Won Han; Soon-Cheol Hong; Hyun Mee Ryu; Min-Jeong Oh; Hai-Joong Kim; Seung Chul Kim Journal: Life (Basel) Date: 2020-12-26
Authors: Marlena Schoenberg Fejzo; Ronny Myhre; Lucía Colodro-Conde; Kimber W MacGibbon; Janet S Sinsheimer; M V Prasad Linga Reddy; Päivi Pajukanta; Dale R Nyholt; Margaret J Wright; Nicholas G Martin; Stephanie M Engel; Sarah E Medland; Per Magnus; Patrick M Mullin Journal: Mol Cell Endocrinol Date: 2016-09-20 Impact factor: 4.369